Author Topic: Starting Point Of Israel/Palestine Conflict?  (Read 46603 times)

Online JMHO

  • Dansdeals Lifetime Platinum Elite
  • *******
  • Join Date: Apr 2020
  • Posts: 1719
  • Total likes: 1471
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 0
    • View Profile
  • Location: NYC
Re: Starting Point Of Israel/Palestine Conflict?
« Reply #80 on: October 30, 2023, 02:45:11 PM »
You want a discussion about our religions? Is that what you want?
Nope

Offline yungermanchik

  • Dansdeals Presidential Platinum Elite
  • ********
  • Join Date: Nov 2018
  • Posts: 3055
  • Total likes: 2550
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 2
    • View Profile
  • Location: Previous Signatures: If you chapped hana'ah from a post, like it; You think you know the answers and things are the way they seem.. it just ain't so -The Rebbe from Lublin-
Re: Re: Random questions.
« Reply #81 on: October 30, 2023, 03:18:08 PM »
(The word Hamas is based on sn acronyms which translates to "ISLAMIC resistance organization").

Really? it's not based on Tehillim 140:4?
Small people talk about other people.
Average people talk about things
BIG PEOPLE TALK ABOUT IDEAS.

Online EliJelly

  • Dansdeals Presidential Platinum Elite
  • ********
  • Join Date: Jan 2019
  • Posts: 3763
  • Total likes: 4494
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 1
    • View Profile
Re: Re: Random questions.
« Reply #82 on: October 30, 2023, 03:26:13 PM »
If your argument for the conflict is a religious one then you have lost before you have begun.

So here is a different perspective. The "true" one :)

The argument is NOT a religious one. Nowhere in our religion do we see the slightest merit or claim to have a sovereign state of our own in Israel anytime before God himself will return it to us as he promised, with the arrival of Moshiach. In fact, the establishment and existence of a state is a rebellion against God and his decree of exile and redemption for the Jewish nation. That's the only religious argument about Israel today.

But...
That's between the Zionists and God.. The Palestinian's fight with Israel isn't because they stand up to Jewish violation of the Torah, they couldn't care less about our religion. So when you absent the religious aspect of it, of course the Jewish people have a claim to the Land of Israel, an historic one. It was their homeland for millenniums, the land where David and Solomon ruled, the land where the two Temples stood, the land where our Talmudic sages lived and were buried. There is probably no other nation in the world who has such a strong connection to their homeland as Jews have with the Land of Israel. Even in exile we live and breath with our beloved Land we have been expelled of. (The very feelings the Zionists exploited to garner support for their endeavors. Theodore Herzl, with his love for Christianity, who knew zero about Judaism, was okay to establish a nation for the Jews in Uganda, until he was explained that he would get no support from Jews unless it would be in Israel)

So when Palestinians claim there is no Jewish claim to Israel, that the Jews are colonizers, that the Jews stole the country which belonged to them, it's all based on lies without looking to the very basic historic facts on the matter. What else would you expect from an animalistic nation with Jewish blood lust, of course not to look at the facts.

(There is more to say on the religious aspects of this conflict, but we'll leave that for the "Torah & Hashkafa Questions (PC Free For All)" thread, you wanted a non religious explanation, and that's anyways all "you" need to know.)


Offline Yehuda57

  • Dansdeals Lifetime Presidential Platinum Elite
  • *********
  • Join Date: Jan 2014
  • Posts: 5612
  • Total likes: 16224
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 6
    • View Profile
    • Squilled
  • Location: Brooklyn
  • Programs: Official Dansdeals salad correspondent
Re: Re: Random questions.
« Reply #83 on: October 30, 2023, 03:34:15 PM »
So Theodore Herzl, with his love for Christianity, who knew zero about Judaism, was okay to establish a nation for the Jews in Uganda, until he was explained that he would get no support from Jews unless it would be in Israel)


The Uganda proposal was for a *temporary* settlement for Jews who were in immediate danger, with no compromise on the ultimate Zionist ideal of a homeland in what was then Palestine.

Online EliJelly

  • Dansdeals Presidential Platinum Elite
  • ********
  • Join Date: Jan 2019
  • Posts: 3763
  • Total likes: 4494
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 1
    • View Profile
Re: Re: Random questions.
« Reply #84 on: October 30, 2023, 03:49:36 PM »
The Uganda proposal was for a *temporary* settlement for Jews who were in immediate danger, with no compromise on the ultimate Zionist ideal of a homeland in what was then Palestine.

Was based on my Lubavitch source of course.

https://beta.hebrewbooks.org/reader/reader.aspx?sfid=31622#p=347&fitMode=fitwidth&hlts=&ocr=


Offline AsherO

  • Global Moderator
  • Dansdeals Lifetime 25K Presidential Platinum Elite
  • **********
  • Join Date: May 2008
  • Posts: 32078
  • Total likes: 8934
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 79
    • View Profile
  • Location: NYC
Re: Starting Point Of Israel/Palestine Conflict?
« Reply #85 on: October 30, 2023, 03:54:24 PM »
The Uganda proposal was for a *temporary* settlement for Jews who were in immediate danger, with no compromise on the ultimate Zionist ideal of a homeland in what was then Palestine.

So kinda temporary like UNWRA?
DDF FFB (Forum From Birth)

Offline Yehuda57

  • Dansdeals Lifetime Presidential Platinum Elite
  • *********
  • Join Date: Jan 2014
  • Posts: 5612
  • Total likes: 16224
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 6
    • View Profile
    • Squilled
  • Location: Brooklyn
  • Programs: Official Dansdeals salad correspondent
Re: Starting Point Of Israel/Palestine Conflict?
« Reply #86 on: October 30, 2023, 03:55:07 PM »
Was based on my Lubavitch source of course.

https://beta.hebrewbooks.org/reader/reader.aspx?sfid=31622#p=347&fitMode=fitwidth&hlts=&ocr=

I'd go with your contemporaneous source over my modern-day google search  :)

Offline Yehuda57

  • Dansdeals Lifetime Presidential Platinum Elite
  • *********
  • Join Date: Jan 2014
  • Posts: 5612
  • Total likes: 16224
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 6
    • View Profile
    • Squilled
  • Location: Brooklyn
  • Programs: Official Dansdeals salad correspondent
Re: Starting Point Of Israel/Palestine Conflict?
« Reply #87 on: October 30, 2023, 03:57:15 PM »
So kinda temporary like UNWRA?

Perhaps. IINM the Zionists at other times did use the strategy of getting something implemented temporarily with the goal of it remaining permanent.

Offline AsherO

  • Global Moderator
  • Dansdeals Lifetime 25K Presidential Platinum Elite
  • **********
  • Join Date: May 2008
  • Posts: 32078
  • Total likes: 8934
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 79
    • View Profile
  • Location: NYC
Re: Starting Point Of Israel/Palestine Conflict?
« Reply #88 on: October 30, 2023, 03:59:49 PM »
Perhaps. IINM the Zionists at other times did use the strategy of getting something implemented temporarily with the goal of it remaining permanent.

If the past 75-150 years would’ve looked like that (a “temporary” Jewish settlement in Uganda), the world would be such a different place today. I wonder what would look more different, Uganda in 2023, or what is now Israel in 2023.
DDF FFB (Forum From Birth)

Offline Yehuda57

  • Dansdeals Lifetime Presidential Platinum Elite
  • *********
  • Join Date: Jan 2014
  • Posts: 5612
  • Total likes: 16224
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 6
    • View Profile
    • Squilled
  • Location: Brooklyn
  • Programs: Official Dansdeals salad correspondent
Re: Starting Point Of Israel/Palestine Conflict?
« Reply #89 on: October 30, 2023, 04:02:15 PM »
If the past 75-150 years would’ve looked like that (a “temporary” Jewish settlement in Uganda)

It would have been much easier for the Israelis to rescue the hostages in Entebee

Offline Yehuda57

  • Dansdeals Lifetime Presidential Platinum Elite
  • *********
  • Join Date: Jan 2014
  • Posts: 5612
  • Total likes: 16224
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 6
    • View Profile
    • Squilled
  • Location: Brooklyn
  • Programs: Official Dansdeals salad correspondent
Re: Re: Random questions.
« Reply #90 on: October 30, 2023, 04:02:41 PM »

Offline liosac

  • Dansdeals Gold Elite
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jan 2023
  • Posts: 124
  • Total likes: 397
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 0
    • View Profile
  • Location: Lakewood
Re: Re: Random questions.
« Reply #91 on: October 30, 2023, 04:08:25 PM »
The Uganda proposal was for a *temporary* settlement for Jews who were in immediate danger, with no compromise on the ultimate Zionist ideal of a homeland in what was then Palestine.
Herzel’s first try was to get all of the Jews to baptize and convert. He thought that would eliminate anti Semitism. After he realized even the secular Russian Kews would go for the plan and especially after the Dreyfus affair he changed plans.

Online Euclid

  • Dansdeals Lifetime Presidential Platinum Elite
  • *********
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Posts: 5354
  • Total likes: 6769
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 6
    • View Profile
Re: Starting Point Of Israel/Palestine Conflict?
« Reply #92 on: October 30, 2023, 04:08:58 PM »
It would have been much easier for the Israelis to rescue the hostages in Entebee
I mean in that alternate universe the plane wouldve been hijacked to Palestine

Offline AsherO

  • Global Moderator
  • Dansdeals Lifetime 25K Presidential Platinum Elite
  • **********
  • Join Date: May 2008
  • Posts: 32078
  • Total likes: 8934
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 79
    • View Profile
  • Location: NYC
Re: Starting Point Of Israel/Palestine Conflict?
« Reply #93 on: October 30, 2023, 04:11:03 PM »
I mean in that alternate universe the plane wouldve been hijacked to Palestine

in protest of the Zionist occupation of Uganda :P
DDF FFB (Forum From Birth)

Offline liosac

  • Dansdeals Gold Elite
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jan 2023
  • Posts: 124
  • Total likes: 397
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 0
    • View Profile
  • Location: Lakewood
Re: Starting Point Of Israel/Palestine Conflict?
« Reply #94 on: October 30, 2023, 04:21:56 PM »
I don't know the history of Israel too much.
If somebody asks me why aren't Jews considered colonizers. I don't know the answer to it.

I imagine that before any of the 20th century wars people were able to move in and out of the country freely. Eventually a lot of Jewish people started buying land and moving in. It came until a point that the Arabs/Muslims realized that what they own is getting smaller and smaller and put up resistance against allowing Jewish people to buy more land. Which then eventually progressed to fighting.

Is that anywhere accurate?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Jews_and_Judaism_in_the_Land_of_Israel

“at the time of the Arab conquest in the 7th century, the majority of the population was Jewish or Samaritan.[8] According to one estimate, the Jews of Palestine numbered between 300,000 and 400,000 at the time”
“After the conquest, Arabs gradually became the majority population of the land”

“Social and economic discrimination caused substantial Jewish emigration from Palestine. In addition, Muslim civil wars in the 8th and 9th centuries drove many non-Muslims out of the country, with no evidence of mass conversions except among Samaritans. By the end of the 11th century, the Jewish population of Palestine had declined substantially”

Then came the crusaders:
“from 1099 to 1291 the Christian Crusaders "mercilessly persecuted and slaughtered the Jews of Palestine.”

The number of Jews ebbed and flowed through the next few centuries ranging from several thousand to tens of thousands depending on persecutions, expulsions etc.

By 1880 there were only 20,000 to 25,000 Jews in Israel.

Waves of immigration over the next 60 years boosted the population to hundreds of thousands, a number likely not seen since the mMuslim conquest in the 7th Century.


Offline ExGingi

  • Dansdeals Lifetime 10K Presidential Platinum Elite
  • *******
  • Join Date: Nov 2015
  • Posts: 18549
  • Total likes: 8947
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 19
    • View Profile
  • Location: 770
  • Programs: בשורת הגאולה. From Exile to Redemption. GIYF. AAdvantage Executive Platinum®
Re: Starting Point Of Israel/Palestine Conflict?
« Reply #95 on: October 30, 2023, 04:41:18 PM »
To somwhat reinforce what @EliJelly is saying, tying it with the video I posted upthread, and with the Hamas charter.

This ISN'T about sovereignty. The Jews that settled in Israel before Zionism or Herzl were conceived came to live in our holy homeland just because of that, and purchased the places where they lived, whether in Jerusalem, Hebron, Tiberias or elsewhere. Yet the Muslim antisemites still massacred them.

The IslamoNazis (just like the German speaking Nazis) want the place Judenrein.
I've been waiting over 5 years with bated breath for someone to say that!
-- Dan

Offline Darth1

  • Dansdeals Platinum Elite + Lifetime Silver Elite
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2017
  • Posts: 587
  • Total likes: 225
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 1
    • View Profile
  • Location: Jerusalem
Re: Starting Point Of Israel/Palestine Conflict?
« Reply #96 on: October 30, 2023, 05:13:49 PM »
For someone trying to understand the conflict would the beginning of the 19th century be a good starting point?
Not really. The Aliyah of the Perushim was in the beggining of the 19th century. However probably more relevant is the First Aliyah ~1880, and the Second Aliyah ~1905.
« Last Edit: October 30, 2023, 05:17:06 PM by Darth1 »

Offline ExGingi

  • Dansdeals Lifetime 10K Presidential Platinum Elite
  • *******
  • Join Date: Nov 2015
  • Posts: 18549
  • Total likes: 8947
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 19
    • View Profile
  • Location: 770
  • Programs: בשורת הגאולה. From Exile to Redemption. GIYF. AAdvantage Executive Platinum®
I've been waiting over 5 years with bated breath for someone to say that!
-- Dan

Offline jye

  • Dansdeals Platinum Elite + Lifetime Gold Elite
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2017
  • Posts: 897
  • Total likes: 1376
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 0
    • View Profile
  • Location: Lakewood NJ
Re: Starting Point Of Israel/Palestine Conflict?
« Reply #98 on: October 30, 2023, 05:45:44 PM »
To somwhat reinforce what @EliJelly is saying, tying it with the video I posted upthread, and with the Hamas charter.

This ISN'T about sovereignty. The Jews that settled in Israel before Zionism or Herzl were conceived came to live in our holy homeland just because of that, and purchased the places where they lived, whether in Jerusalem, Hebron, Tiberias or elsewhere. Yet the Muslim antisemites still massacred them.

The IslamoNazis (just like the German speaking Nazis) want the place Judenrein.
The above is way oversimplified, especially if one takes the Eidah Hachareidus/ Old Yishuv viewpoint into account.

From their point of view the Zionists poked the bear in the late 1800’s and made what was a tolerable if unpleasant golus situation in the Arabian countries and Eretz Yisrael into one where billions of Arabs foment for Israel and the Jews destruction. The non Zionist religious Jews living in the old yishuv never had statehood aspirations. They faced discrimination from the Muslims but it was relatively tolerable compared to Europe, coupled with a grudging respect for the Jewish chacham and leaders. The Zionists were politically adept and claimed to speak for all Jews, but the old yishuv never appointed the Zionists to speak for them; the furthest thing on their mind was to start up with the nations by proclaiming a right to a Jewish homeland. Most of the Arab unrest was concurrent with the rise of Zionism and the proclamation of Eretz Yisrael to be the Jewish homeland.

True there was already pressure from the massive influx of European Jews escaping progroms anti semitism there. Yet it was the political machinations and nationalist aspirations of the Zionist movement that really fomented the unrest.

(In fact Rav Hunter maintained that the zionists were directly responsible for causing the Islamic Mufti to align with Hitler, thereby bringing Eisav and Yishmael together, and in a ruchniyus sense causing the churban Europa.)

Was there ever a viable two state plan? Sort of. During the British Mandate European Jews were refused entry to Eretz Yisrael, eventually perishing en masse in the holocaust. Yet there was actually a serious proposal that would have saved a large number of European Jews by allowing them to emigrate to Eretz Yisrael.

A gifted political figure named Yaakov Dehaan who was originally a Zionist but then grew close to Rav Yosef Chaim Zonnenfeld, representing the Perushim and the old yishuv, had the countours of a broad based agreement with king Hussein, the other Arab leaders, and the British that would have relinquished Jewish Statehood but would have completely lifted the quota on immigration and given the Jews full rights in Eretz Yisrael as equals. Hundreds of thousands of Jews would have had a destination to go to instead of being forced to stay in Europe by British quotas where they met their end at the hand of the nazis.

This plan was completely at odds with the Zionist agenda of winning world support for a Jewish State.
The zionists were furious at anyone undermining their political machine, sabotaging their plans for an independent State, so they assassinated Dahan in cold blood as he left davening. The proposal fell apart with his death and the only remaining political push was the Zionist one of an independent state, which infuriated the Arabs and had the British alarmed.

Things reached a boiling point and the Arab riots in chevron (and Gaza- there was a Jewish community in Gaza as well) and Yerushalayim took place, culminating in the war of ‘48 , the loss of Jewish access to the Kosel for 19 years, and the exile of the perushim and the old yishuv from the old Jewish quarter after hundreds of years of continuous settlement, long before Zionism was ever conceived. That exile was permanent, as the perushim never returned to the Jewish quarter.

 The umbrella organization of the perushim under which Yaakov Dahan negotiated his proposal in the early 1920’s , the Vaad Ha’ir, later became known as the Eidah Hachareidis. Now you know the rest of the story and why the Eidah Hachareidus continues to view the zionists as illegitimate usurpers.

There is a recognition among even the most anti Zionist faction (not counting the crazies) that we are stuck with the current situation and at this point a Jewish government is a fact; the Arabs at this point would massacre us in a heartbeat. No rational person believes that the IDF is not Al pi derech hateva what stands between us and wholesale slaughter. Yet they view the current situation where one billion Muslims would like nothing better that to wipe the Jews off the map as a direct result of choices that were made years ago.
 
Again the above is their point of view and leaves some food for thought. See also Rav Reuvein Grozonskys בעיות הזמן.





« Last Edit: October 30, 2023, 06:50:59 PM by jye »

Offline ExGingi

  • Dansdeals Lifetime 10K Presidential Platinum Elite
  • *******
  • Join Date: Nov 2015
  • Posts: 18549
  • Total likes: 8947
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 19
    • View Profile
  • Location: 770
  • Programs: בשורת הגאולה. From Exile to Redemption. GIYF. AAdvantage Executive Platinum®
Re: Starting Point Of Israel/Palestine Conflict?
« Reply #99 on: October 30, 2023, 06:15:09 PM »

A gifted political figure named Yaakov Dahan who was originally a Zionist but then grew close to Rav Yosef Chaim Zonnenfeld, representing the Perushim and the old yishuv, had the countours of a broad based agreement with king Hussein, the other Arab leaders, and the British that would have relinquished Jewish Statehood but would have completely lifted the quota on immigration and given the Jews full rights in Eretz Yisrael as equals. Hundreds of thousands of Jews would have had a destination to go to instead of being forced to stay in Europe by British quotas where they met their end at the hand of the nazis.

This plan was completely at odds with the Zionist agenda of winning world support for a Jewish State.
The zionists were furious at anyone undermining their political machine, sabotaging their plans for an independent State, so they assassinated Dahan in cold blood as he left davening. The proposal fell apart with his death and the only remaining political push was the Zionist one of an independent state, which infuriated the Arabs and had the British alarmed.


Thanks for adding those details. Though the name was de Haan, not Dahan. The 2nd political assassination in Israel (after גדליהו בן אחיקם)
I've been waiting over 5 years with bated breath for someone to say that!
-- Dan