Most are grotesque misquotes but I’m not sure why he’s pretending יאוש is necessary for אבידת עכו״ם. Anyway, there are sticky passages without the misconstruing, so pretending that’s all it is may not be the best strategy. But perhaps it depends on the audience.
They didn’t get to the part where פיקוח נפש isn’t דוחה שבת?
Didn’t look it up now but I’m pretty sure בשעת מלחמה is a big question of girsa.
עם הדומה לחמור is the reason why there is no יחוס - totally ignored etc.
Nice hearos.
But what do you think of the general idea of responding to them by explaining in each case why wer'e not racist? (vdai birmiza)
His goal is certainly to explain to those who aren't off the deep end haters. On the other hand, the reponses- just straight out anti semitic. So it's egging them on more.
There's also the issue of teaching Torah shebaal peh.
Bottom line, as a strategy, will this help lower the anti semitism on Twitter?
Like I said, I believe ain lidavar sof.
I see R' Efrem Goldberg thinks different. Maybe if only to strengthen Jews who may think there is truth to it, notwithstanding that it will attract tons of hate.
@imayid2
