Author Topic: Which Airport In "Occupied Palestinian Territory" Does DL Or A Partner Fly To? (Read 12847 times)

AsherO · « **Reply #20 on:** February 07, 2012, 01:10:04 PM »

Quote from: Avid Reader on February 07, 2012, 12:39:27 PM

Linky http://www.dansdeals.com/archives/19357

Thanks!

Quote from: whYME on February 07, 2012, 12:45:57 PM

unfortunately "PS" ("Palestinian territory, occupied") is an ISO country code. any database of countries will have it included.
I personally always take it out manually.

Maybe we need to petition the ISO.

whYME · « **Reply #21 on:** February 07, 2012, 01:12:15 PM »

Quote from: AsherO on February 07, 2012, 01:10:04 PM

Maybe we need to petition the ISO.

Good luck with that

Chaikel · « **Reply #22 on:** February 07, 2012, 01:19:06 PM »

Quote from: Dan on February 07, 2012, 01:04:24 PM

Click refresh, but they have added back “Palestinian Territories” but occupied is gone.

You do realize that is worse. "Occupied Palestinian Territories" means that it is Israel, just occupied by Palestinians (the liberals refer to it as "Israeli Occupied land")
"Palestinian Territories" means it belongs to them

Dan · « **Reply #23 on:** February 07, 2012, 01:20:07 PM »

Guys, retweet them and let's make ourselves heard!

AJK · « **Reply #24 on:** February 07, 2012, 01:26:36 PM »

Quote from: Chaikel on February 07, 2012, 01:19:06 PM

You do realize that is worse. "Occupied Palestinian Territories" means that it is Israel, just occupied by Palestinians (the liberals refer to it as "Israeli Occupied land")
"Palestinian Territories" means it belongs to them

I'm not sure its worse, but it is still certainly inaccurate.

Dan · « **Reply #25 on:** February 07, 2012, 01:28:32 PM »

Retweet!

moish · « **Reply #26 on:** February 07, 2012, 01:32:18 PM »

Quote from: Chaikel on February 07, 2012, 01:19:06 PM

You do realize that is worse. "Occupied Palestinian Territories" means that it is Israel, just occupied by Palestinians (the liberals refer to it as "Israeli Occupied land")
"Palestinian Territories" means it belongs to them

huh? Occupied Palestinian Territories means that it belongs to the palestinians, but israel is occupying their land

Side incomer · « **Reply #27 on:** February 07, 2012, 01:56:39 PM »

We should also do some phone calls to Delta corporate customer care:
1-404-773-0305. Then press 7 for comments and complaints. They are really nice senior agents.

mclovin · « **Reply #28 on:** February 07, 2012, 02:08:56 PM »

Quote from: Side incomer on February 07, 2012, 09:20:35 AM

And here you have another one:
https://www.nationalcar.com/cwpindex.do
By the were do you live, they have an option: "Palestinian territory, occupied".

And again it's Delta!!

i think they might have removed it. im getting an error message when i click the link

meshugener · « **Reply #29 on:** February 07, 2012, 02:52:46 PM »

Would like to ask Delta how they define "occupy", is it when you rule against the people's will, so why not "Occupied Syrian Arab Republic"? If its when you control it without having it recognized by the UN, its not either recognized as Palestinian Territory. Huh?

Dan · « **Reply #30 on:** February 07, 2012, 02:56:05 PM »

#OccupyDelta anyone?

Chaikel · « **Reply #31 on:** February 07, 2012, 03:24:22 PM »

Quote from: Dan on February 07, 2012, 02:56:05 PM

#OccupyDelta anyone?

you mean #OneMoreReasonNotToOccupyDelta

moish · « **Reply #32 on:** February 07, 2012, 04:08:27 PM »

dan did you stumble upon this in the first place? if yes, you didnt get any credit...

www.vosizneias.com/wp/100553/2012/02/07/new-york-occupied-palestinian-territory-removed-from-delta-list/

Dan · « **Reply #33 on:** February 07, 2012, 04:23:10 PM »

I posted it way before the JPost did. Such is life. Feel free to post a comment there.

AJK · « **Reply #34 on:** February 07, 2012, 04:49:08 PM »

Quote from: Dan on February 07, 2012, 04:23:10 PM

I posted it way before the JPost did. Such is life. Feel free to post a comment there.

Ah, but were you the one to discover it first was the question

If you did, I'd be glad to post a comment there.

joeb1 · « **Reply #35 on:** February 07, 2012, 05:07:46 PM »

i called they said they will change it

whYME · « **Reply #36 on:** February 07, 2012, 05:12:04 PM »

Quote from: AJK on February 07, 2012, 04:49:08 PM

Ah, but were you the one to discover it first was the question

If you did, I'd be glad to post a comment there.

+1

mclovin · « **Reply #37 on:** February 07, 2012, 07:24:01 PM »

Quote from: AJK on February 07, 2012, 04:49:08 PM

Ah, but were you the one to discover it first was the question

If you did, I'd be glad to post a comment there.

unless u can prove it, posting a comment wont help

AJK · « **Reply #38 on:** February 07, 2012, 07:26:58 PM »

Quote from: mclovin on February 07, 2012, 07:24:01 PM

unless u can prove it, posting a comment wont help

It wouldn't be that hard to show that he was the first to publicly point it out.

But, even so, why do I need to prove it?

whYME · « **Reply #39 on:** February 07, 2012, 08:02:48 PM »

Quote from: mclovin on February 07, 2012, 07:24:01 PM

unless u can prove it, posting a comment wont help

I don't think proving it is the issue.
the question is was Dan the one to break the story (in which case they should've mentioned it), or was he just before the Jpost (in which case not necessarily)