I'm more or less a believer in the efficient-market hypothesis. Anyhow, I've been burnt in the past from ppl's 'insider' tips on tiny companies.A friend tried to sell me on the SpongeTech company (owned by a frum guy in Queens) b/c it went belly up in the biggest penny stock fraud in history.http://www.thefinancialinvestigator.com/?p=51Either way, sorry for going OT.
Believing in the EMH does not preclude "making educated stock pics." Re: spongetech - had a friend who worked there. Just terrible.
If you're randomly choosing a stock to hold for 5 years (ie, you're not trying to build a portfolio based of of Markowitz's principles), then I'm not sure that throwing a dart is any worse than spending 10 hours researching. You disagree?If you're trying to build a portfolio on the efficient frontier (or whatever its called), than you need to be cognizant of volatility, correlations, etc.
I'm not sure I understand what you're trying to say.If you're randomly choosing a stock for 5 years, how are you spending 10 hours researching?
That's like saying running a marathon is no better than walking a marathon (assuming winning is not the point).Pretty big caveat, there.
Disagree. The typical investor could care less about the efficient frontier. They're looking for alpha more than anything else.
You realize alpha is the risk-adjusted return of an investment, yes?
im about to make my last deposit to hit 100k. i was just wonderin if it makes a difference if the money was deposited into 1 account or 2? meaning i have a savings and an investment account. do they count all the money cumulatively or it has to be 100k to 1 account?
I already deposited 25+ nothing posted
when did you start and which programs?
A further data point- Signed up for the UA promo near the the end of March, been cycling between 5k and 15k since then, completed 100k last week, and just received the last 25k (for a total of 50k) today.
did you receive the invalid promo (ua) email?