His point was that the bible would stand in court. That is sheer idiocy. I'm not sure which part of this we are not understanding each other.
This needs a new thread but if you believe the bible can be discredited then why do you believe it's 100% true. To me the logic doesn't flow, it's as if you're saying I believe 100% in something that isn't 100% true. If it were to be proven wrong hypothetically, why would you continue believing its true?
seriously? ever heard of "makom hinichu" it wouldn't be emunah if it was so pashut
Sorry "makom hinichu" only means that the Torah can't be proven right, it does NOT mean that it can be proven wrong.
in court that's all u would need. isn't that what we're dealing with?
I am not going to go there but I agree the Bible or any other book/religion could never make the cut in court.
See the picture, ugh
Aha, so we do agree. You were just trying to make.trouble
Hebrew: http://www.bhol.co.il/article.aspx?id=57613
why would the secret service help the Satmar Rabbi?
I can assure you this story is not true...I know Mr. Greenberg, and he's a well knownday dreamer... And Der Blaat has always beenlooking out for sensational news...
Wow, today I reached a milestone!
+?
we'll take your word here!