What I am saying he seems obsessed with her. That is not good.
Not sure if it belongs here, but interesting to me https://www.reddit.com/r/personalfinance/comments/5mtova/im_dying_in_a_few_months_i_have_a_1200000_life/
I'm not really into cars but when I was younger I always wanted one of these -http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/cars/2017/01/09/ford-bronco-ford-ranger-detroit-auto-show-naias/96335840/
AP dead or Obi dead?
Any way to retrieve the original post? It seems the OP deleted the text of his post
Also, I'm 32 and she is 33 and I want to ensure she is taken care of as best as possible w/ a finance safety net for life (I know 1.2 millino isn't a lot for 40 years); is there a way I can put 50% in a mutual fund that she can only collect dividends from and 50% in a 20 year annuity or something?Welcoming all advice related.Her income potential is roughly $30k-$40k/yr and will never go up probablyAlso, we have no savings or 401k. I make 130k/yr and we live paycheck to paycheck because we are retardedly financially irresponsible....and somehow are able to waste that money without buying luxury goods, drugs, or gambling...No need to say stuff like "sorry for what your going through and such", this isn't a sob story.Edit: The amount of PM"s I've received from financial advisers wanting to help me out for a "percentage" iis hilariously sad
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/shortcuts/2017/jan/09/alexa-amazon-echo-goes-rogue-accidental-shopping-dolls-house
What’s striking, though, is how, in some respects, their conclusions about the IAT don’t seem all that far apart. Greenwald acknowledges that a person’s score can vary significantly, depending on when the test is taken, and he doesn’t think it’s reliable enough to be used to, say, select bias-free juries. "We do not regard the IAT as diagnosing something that inevitably results in racist or prejudicial behavior," he says.Everyone agrees that the statistical effect linking bias to behavior is slight. They only disagree about how slight. Blanton’s 2013 meta-analysis found less of a link than a 2009 meta-analysis by Banaji and Greenwald. Blanton sees the correlation as so small as to be trivial. Banaji and Greenwald, in a 2015 paper, argue that "statistically small effects" can have "societally large effects."
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-01-09/the-best-and-worst-airlines-in-the-world
Surprise. Surprise. Look who got to be #1 (hint: it ain't flattering) https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-01-09/the-best-and-worst-airlines-in-the-world
Topic Wiki
Topic: Interesting Articles... (Read 1048380 times)