https://scienmag.com/research-suggests-wearing-a-police-uniform-changes-the-way-the-brain-processes-info/?utm_content=socialchamprkWyYrYj_l&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=socialchamp.ioThis has numerous interesting points in it
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2017/02/a_scientific_examination_of_what_trump_tweets_during_shabbat.html
But that isn’t science, so I conducted a poll of Slate employees to see if they agreed. Using a Google Form, I showed each participant Trump’s 15 most retweeted Shabbat tweets and his 15 most retweeted non-Shabbat tweets, in a random order, and asked them to rate the craziness of each collection from 1 (“Not crazy at all”) to 5 (“Unbelievably crazy”). On average, the 39 participants rated the Shabbat tweets 4.49 and the non-Shabbat tweets 3.92, with a p-value of .002. That’s crazy!
Add a heaping measure of selection bias.....
You actually took the time to read through, and then quote from that drivel???
That website is full of garbage, but very entertaining. And enlightening to see how others think
AP dead or Obi dead?
http://digiday.com/publishers/wall-street-journal-close-google-loophole-entirely/
Sad!
I don't consider it a real loophole. IINM google has a rule against paywall content, blocking it from search results.If WSJ wants to show up in google results it needs to be content that people can read.Otherwise, it's just wasting precious space that can be used for sites that allow you to read the story. I hope google blocks them out completely now.
http://www.timesofisrael.com/in-ultra-orthodox-fashion-you-can-tell-a-lot-about-a-person-by-his-button-holes/"Haredi men’s suits and coats could cost up to $20,000 or $30,000."