For reference. maybe you can point to a Fox News article on R’ Fienstein funeral pointing out how Cuomo criticized the Jewish Orthodox community etc.
Talk about being presumptuous.
When an injustice is done to a black person my default thought process isn’t “it must be racism” in the same manner when someone comes around my neighborhood on a fri. night shooting out car windows of vehicles owned by Jews I don’t jump to “must be an anti Semite on a rampage.” I’ll wait for the facts to come out. But when there is a clear double standard and we refuse to call out, I call BS.
This has nothing to do with the subject of the article. This has been a pet peeve of mine for a while. It's not limited to FOX News; I've seen it on CNN, MSNBC, AP, and other sites. The standard article usually has a paragraph or two at the end which seemingly doesn't fit with the article itself. It's usually loosely connected, or references a previous development related to the rest of the article's content. I don't know why that paragraph is included. It could be to up the word count, to keep people on the site a little longer for revenue purposes, to generate clicks when those paragraphs link to the related content, or to make people search the site for the story on the previous development. Regardless of the degeneration of journalistic standards, it is still the norm to have that paragraph. With that context, I don't see the difference between the paragraph found at the end of the NY Post and similar paragraphs found at the end of most other articles.
Regarding your fairness in racism, that wasn't the point. I didn't say any injustice was done. In fact, I was referring to the overuse of the racism cry, and saying that we have the same issue of overuse when claiming anti-Semitism. Where we roll our eyes at the overuse in one instance, we're quick to try to justify it when it's us doing it. That's a double standard.