« Reply #1012 on: November 03, 2015, 03:58:04 PM »
I don't think that the only reason for wanting big law is debt and that once it's paid, people plan on leaving. I've always wanted to do big law and will be starting in October. Thank G-d won't have that much debt to pay off, but plan/hope to stay at a firm for my whole career.
My personal reason for wanting to do so – there aren't that many jobs out there that pay enough to support a Jewish lifestyle (I don't want to have to ask for tuition breaks) and I think that it will be intellectually stimulating and won't get boring after a few years.
Of course it's not the *only* reason. The primary reason though, whether it's for servicing debt or for supporting a Jewish family,
is for the money. Simple as that.
The business of law is a bad business model. You will make a living. Big law firm life is not made for frum lawyers. 14 hour days 6 days a week take a toll. Unless you are at a furm like Fried Frank where frum lawyers seem to make it, your not gonna make partner in most big firms. Anyone that asks me about law school gets the bad business model speech. Unless you have clients that you can invest with or who will take you along for the ride either when they go big as GC or public its probably not the best idea to count on making it big as a lawyer.
Frum lawyers make it in more big firms than just Fried Frank.
In any event, you side-stepped my comment: Big law is the *only* way in the short term to effectively service nearly $200K in debt if you want any prayer of getting out from underneath the mountain before you can collect SS, notwithstanding your allegation that big law "is over over over-rated."
Logged
2015: 116K bkd | 1.6M brnd | F: OZ,NH,AA,EK | J: UA,CA,TK,DL,TN,AF,VA | LIH,NRT,ROR,PEK,CNS,BOB,MEL,TLV & Pacific Hopper