I'm responding as respectfully as I can, to clarify my point.
You asserted I made an accusation. You pointed to a post I made. Yet you don’t find a any chiddush there. So, in what way is it accusatory?
I have been making the rather simple point that in regards to kosher certification it’s wise to be an educated consumer. I’d imagine you agree.
you called hechsheirim inept, and woefully so. you agreed it was accusatory and asked how to say it better. I asked what "it" was, and you're saying to be educated. so the answer to your question is - say to be educated without throwing hashgochas and the rabbonim behind them under the bus.
And of course, we all know about OU tuna fish. I don't eat it. that's a good example of being an educated consumer, and one that comes up weekly here, so we all know it.
Is this for real?
Listen I’m merely passing on information I’ve obtained about this case for those that care. You are entitled to disregard it at your own risk.
Again, you did so based on your limited exposure. And then gave a hard time to anyone who rationally pointed out that it may be limited. And proceeded to put the blame on the hashgochas and their rabbonim.
Yes he did have an interesting opinion on this. You’re certainly entitled to follow it. Though I hope you respectfully understand those that don’t.
Hagaon Rav Moshe Feinstein ZT"L didn't "have an interesting opinion". He wrote a brilliant teshuva on the sugya. Please bring Maareh Mekomos of those who are choilek, and please make sure you understand a sugya with clarity before dismissing the poisek hador as having an interesting opinion.
I'm only trying to keep the respect due to Talmidei Chachamim of stature intact. Personal chumras and hanhagos are 1000% ok, and I'm all for education and information. But please try to frame it in a way that isn't making someone else 'wrong'. Unless, like KLBD, tablet K or triangle K, the mainstream halachik community considers them to be wrong