Topic Wiki

Term insurance vs Whole life

Term insurance is the cheapest and simplest.  You pay a premium and  if chv”sh the insured person dies, the beneficiary gets the insurance amount. The higher the risk a person is, the higher the premium.  So people with worse health  will pay more than healthy people for the same amount of insurance, and older people will pay more than younger people.
Level term.  One popular type of term insurance has a level premium for a fixed number of years. Many people prefer this to the traditional type of term insurance where the premium each each year pays for coverage only in that year (and as a result the premiums increase every year, because you are aging). In contrast, a level premium term insurance policy has an unchanging premium amount that is guaranteed for a specific number of years. As a result of the design you are overpaying in the early years of the policy to subsidize your cost in the later years. Popular guarantee periods are 10, 20 or 30 years.  As with any insurance, it pays to get one while you are healthy to lock in the lowest rate possible (in general, health only declines, you rarely hear of people getting healthier with age).
Return of Premium (ROP) Level term. Same as level term, but with a higher premium. At the end of the level period (e.g. 20 years or 30 years) you get back all of your premiums. Your premium is buying you two things: Part pays for the term insurance, and the other part pays for the cash payment you can get if you are alive at the end and didn't miss any premium payments. If you are mathematically inclined you can calculate an IRR and decide if you see a value in doing this.

The policies below combine "investing" with insurance. As they are front-loaded with large fees and commissions, they typically lose money for a few years and then break even. These rarely make sense for lower to middle class families.
Whole life has a level premium that is guaranteed not to increase for as long as you live. Because of insurance laws in the US, this type of insurance policy must always have a "cash value", which is the amount of money you get back if you cancel the policy. That makes Whole Life a much more expensive choice relative to pure insurance coverage (where you'd get nothing back if you cancel) and therefore a bad choice for most people who are not rich (this is complicated to explain in great detail, but it is an effective summary of who is most likely to see good value in buying Whole Life). One fringe benefit of having a cash value in Whole Life is that you have saved money which can be used for your retirement or any other purpose if you are still alive.  For most people though, other savings vehicles will be better.
Universal life is very similar to whole life, in that it is meant to provide insurance coverage for as long as you live (as opposed to Term, which is meant to for a short to medium period of time). The most important difference is that the premium rates for Universal Life are not guaranteed, unlike Whole Life which is completely guaranteed. The concept behind Universal Life is that the insurance company tells you all the charges you are paying for and lets you pay as much or as little as you want for the coverage. Anything extra that you pay goes into an account that can earn interest, and as long as that account doesn't run out of money you stay insured.
Variable Life is an offshoot of Universal Life. The difference is that instead of the extra money going into an account that earns interest, you can choose to invest the extra money in mutual funds. Take my word as an expert in insurance that Variable Universal Life is only for the most investment oriented people (meaning that they barely care at all about the insurance part of the policy). If you are trying to decide on Term or Variable, the answer is always Term.

Choosing a company
Generally, the companies that focus on term insurance will have the best prices (i.e. rates) for term. Those companies are Banner, SBLI, AIG, etc. If you want to buy term, use a quote aggregator to get quotes from several companies at once. Here is one example of an aggregator (a good one!).
[No one here is getting a commission for this link]
http://www.term4sale.com/
https://www.accuquotelife.com/
https://www.matrixdirect.com/term-life-insurance#fv

If you are looking for Whole Life, Universal Life, or any other permanent product, you won't find quotes on aggregators- you will need to go to a company agent or an independent broker. A simple piece of advice for someone in this position is to get quotes from companies that focus on the product you want. For example, Whole Life is done best by mutual companies (e.g. New York Life, Guardian, Northwestern, Mass Mutual, Penn, Mutual of Omaha). Universal Life (and VUL) are the main products of public stock companies (e.g. Metlife, Prudential, etc.). Most big companies sell all the different types of products, but may not be competitive in price for all of them.

One ddf'er feels strongly that when choosing a company to buy Term from, a major factor is the what "conversion" rights the policy comes with. Conversion is a feature that entitles you to buy Whole Life or Universal Life at some point in the future (presumably when you have more money and can afford the higher priced plans) without being underwritten again - meaning you keep your rating no matter how your health may change. Conversion is certainly a valuable benefit if you anticipate needing permanent insurance at some point, and not all companies are created equal. When evaluating conversion features, you need to look at 1) how long does the conversion right last and 2) what product does the company let you convert to. Many companies offer liberal conversion rights but have bad permanent products, and you need to be educated enough to see through this and value it as a poor option.

Valuable tips for when you apply
Underwriting is the insurance company deciding which rating to give each applicant. They check health and driving record, but do not check credit rating. They can approve with their best rating, or pretty much offer whatever they want as each company has many rate classes.

Different companies can and do give different ratings to the exact same people. So if you don't like the rating one company offered, apply to a different company and maybe you'll be happier. Often, they can use the test results from the other company and you won't need to give blood a second time.

Do not eat for at least 12 hours before blood test. You can drink water.

Pregnant women can apply but most companies view blood work and weight as is. Translation: not wise to apply for life insurance while pregnant... do it before.

Shameless plug  :)
After you've done your own research, you could reach out to a broker to make the purchase. Remember to take advise from a broker with a grain of salt, since he is a salesman and your decision affects his income. Best to come prepared.
Henche's Broker, via ddf recommendation
Heshy Sheldon Breier. 
Worldwide Ins.
T:(718)253-9500
F:(718)252-3426
E:Sheldon@ww-ins.com

Author Topic: Whole Life Vs. Term Life Insurance  (Read 138101 times)

Offline Barryg

  • Dansdeals Lifetime Platinum Elite
  • *******
  • Join Date: Nov 2012
  • Posts: 1684
  • Total likes: 63
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 0
    • View Profile
  • Location: Ohio
Re: Whole Life Vs. Term Life Insurance
« Reply #480 on: November 13, 2014, 01:04:56 AM »
How is his plan (a plan suggested by me, based on his stated needs) similar to your's? The fact that you somehow twisted what he wrote in your mind to the point that it has any similarity to your 30 cheap/10 convertible plan proves my point.
As of last posted on this thread he was thinking about taking out two policies one for 30 year term/ one for 20. To me this is similar to part of coverage in 30 and part in 10... Similar = not exactly the same... Did anyone else in this thread say to take out two term plans?

Offline skyguy918

  • Dansdeals Presidential Platinum Elite
  • ********
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 4077
  • Total likes: 835
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 1
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Location: Queens, NY
Re: Whole Life Vs. Term Life Insurance
« Reply #481 on: November 13, 2014, 01:11:08 AM »
As of last posted on this thread he was thinking about taking out two policies one for 30 year term/ one for 20. To me this is similar to part of coverage in 30 and part in 10... Similar = not exactly the same... Did anyone else in this thread say to take out two term plans?
In your plan, the purpose is to attain convertibility while reducing cost. That is not at all what he's trying to do. He's using 2 policies to better fit his projected non-level coverage need. He's buying 30 year in the reduced amount he expects to need from years 21-30, and 20 year in the amount of the difference between what he expects to need from years 1-20 and 21-30. There's no need for either policy to be a blue-chip convertible because he feels his coverage needs are finished by the end of year 30.

The reason you don't see my suggestion in this thread is because it was in my response to his PM.

Offline Barryg

  • Dansdeals Lifetime Platinum Elite
  • *******
  • Join Date: Nov 2012
  • Posts: 1684
  • Total likes: 63
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 0
    • View Profile
  • Location: Ohio
Re: Whole Life Vs. Term Life Insurance
« Reply #482 on: November 13, 2014, 01:25:01 AM »
In your plan, the purpose is to attain convertibility while reducing cost. That is not at all what he's trying to do. He's using 2 policies to better fit his projected non-level coverage need. He's buying 30 year in the reduced amount he expects to need from years 21-30, and 20 year in the amount of the difference between what he expects to need from years 1-20 and 21-30. There's no need for either policy to be a blue-chip convertible because he feels his coverage needs are finished by the end of year 30.

The reason you don't see my suggestion in this thread is because it was in my response to his PM.
PM=Public message ??

Upthread, I was asking him why he is only going with 20 and not 30, apparently (as I said two quotes ago) he is thinking properly and now does want some coverage for 30 years. A lot farther upthread, I had stated that most ppl wouldn't want to pay the price to have all coverage in 30 year term, and that was one of the reasons to split.

Q time...
You are an expert in the field and are also knowledgeable in the subject. I'm sure that by now you have seen instances when one who thought they would never entertain permanent coverage changed their mind (for various reasons). Even though he feels he will never buy/replace/switch/add/convert these two stated plans and this will be the last time he ever thinks/buys insurance - you and I both know that something will change and their most likely will be a future switch. I believe he is better off with a plan convertible to whole life just in case. Do you agree or disagree?

Offline yos9694

  • Dansdeals Lifetime Platinum Elite
  • *******
  • Join Date: Aug 2012
  • Posts: 1911
  • Total likes: 908
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 6
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Whole Life Vs. Term Life Insurance
« Reply #483 on: November 13, 2014, 12:18:13 PM »
(which was in the wiki, before someone erased it)

Wikis don't get erased, the history is still there. Take another look, you will see that I kept your points in the updated version of the wiki - heck, I even kept Henche's business card in there. I added and organized.

Offline yos9694

  • Dansdeals Lifetime Platinum Elite
  • *******
  • Join Date: Aug 2012
  • Posts: 1911
  • Total likes: 908
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 6
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Whole Life Vs. Term Life Insurance
« Reply #484 on: November 13, 2014, 12:19:59 PM »
PM=Public message ??

PM = Private Misunderstanding

Offline skyguy918

  • Dansdeals Presidential Platinum Elite
  • ********
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 4077
  • Total likes: 835
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 1
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Location: Queens, NY
Re: Whole Life Vs. Term Life Insurance
« Reply #485 on: November 13, 2014, 12:35:28 PM »
PM=Public message ??
Private message. Along the top of each page it says Home, Help, ..., My Messages. You can send and receive private messages to other forum members through that link.
Upthread, I was asking him why he is only going with 20 and not 30, apparently (as I said two quotes ago) he is thinking properly and now does want some coverage for 30 years. A lot farther upthread, I had stated that most ppl wouldn't want to pay the price to have all coverage in 30 year term, and that was one of the reasons to split.
This is getting ridiculous. Yes, he'd rather do the split of 2 policies than take $2m of 30 year because it costs less. No, that's not at all like what you've been advocating, just because both strategies involve 2 policies and a net cost savings.
Q time...
You are an expert in the field and are also knowledgeable in the subject. I'm sure that by now you have seen instances when one who thought they would never entertain permanent coverage changed their mind (for various reasons). Even though he feels he will never buy/replace/switch/add/convert these two stated plans and this will be the last time he ever thinks/buys insurance - you and I both know that something will change and their most likely will be a future switch. I believe he is better off with a plan convertible to whole life just in case. Do you agree or disagree?
Strongly disagree, especially with the part about me being an expert  ;). Nothing I've said even comes close to advising that you should buy a policy when you're young and stop there. Re-evaluating your insurance needs every few years is something that everyone should do no matter what. And regardless of what you bought when you were young, you'll always have options in terms of addressing new insurance needs later in life. That is not something that in any way is tied to combining longer and shorter terms, or buying blue-chip convertible policies.

My general position is that permanent insurance (especially WL from the mutuals) is a valuable financial tool for tax reasons, which only truly becomes worthwhile once you're maxing out other tax-advantaged vehicles. There are certainly scenarios where longer periods of coverage needs, or other specific scenarios (maybe for certain types of people, the pure investment aspect of WL), become a major factor advocating for permanent insurance, but IMO that doesn't constitute a majority, and may not even represent a significant minority.

Therefore, IMO the need to buy term that's blue-chip convertible term is more contingent on the likelihood of the policyholder being in that financial position in the future (or one of the other, less likely scenarios I mentioned).

Offline skyguy918

  • Dansdeals Presidential Platinum Elite
  • ********
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 4077
  • Total likes: 835
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 1
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Location: Queens, NY
Re: Whole Life Vs. Term Life Insurance
« Reply #486 on: November 13, 2014, 12:36:16 PM »
PM = Private Misunderstanding
Lol. Although it's more like Private Understanding and Public Misunderstanding.

Offline Barryg

  • Dansdeals Lifetime Platinum Elite
  • *******
  • Join Date: Nov 2012
  • Posts: 1684
  • Total likes: 63
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 0
    • View Profile
  • Location: Ohio
Re: Whole Life Vs. Term Life Insurance
« Reply #487 on: November 14, 2014, 12:24:29 AM »
Wikis don't get erased, the history is still there. Take another look, you will see that I kept your points in the updated version of the wiki - heck, I even kept Henche's business card in there. I added and organized.
Maybe someone else changed in the middle, but the original wiki has definitely been erased, and replaced. You should have completed reg 60 forms...

Offline Barryg

  • Dansdeals Lifetime Platinum Elite
  • *******
  • Join Date: Nov 2012
  • Posts: 1684
  • Total likes: 63
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 0
    • View Profile
  • Location: Ohio
Re: Whole Life Vs. Term Life Insurance
« Reply #488 on: November 14, 2014, 12:55:52 AM »
Private message. Along the top of each page it says Home, Help, ..., My Messages. You can send and receive private messages to other forum members through that link.This is getting ridiculous. Yes, he'd rather do the split of 2 policies than take $2m of 30 year because it costs less. No, that's not at all like what you've been advocating, just because both strategies involve 2 policies and a net cost savings.Strongly disagree, especially with the part about me being an expert  ;). Nothing I've said even comes close to advising that you should buy a policy when you're young and stop there. Re-evaluating your insurance needs every few years is something that everyone should do no matter what. And regardless of what you bought when you were young, you'll always have options in terms of addressing new insurance needs later in life. That is not something that in any way is tied to combining longer and shorter terms, or buying blue-chip convertible policies.

My general position is that permanent insurance (especially WL from the mutuals) is a valuable financial tool for tax reasons, which only truly becomes worthwhile once you're maxing out other tax-advantaged vehicles. There are certainly scenarios where longer periods of coverage needs, or other specific scenarios (maybe for certain types of people, the pure investment aspect of WL), become a major factor advocating for permanent insurance, but IMO that doesn't constitute a majority, and may not even represent a significant minority.
Private message = don't tell others about it.
The whole point of convertible term is that one may need to address insurance needs later in life, and the conversion privilege allows exactly that - to be able to get the best deal later on a permanent plan (if desired). It doesn't cost much more to get a ten year term with a fancy shmancy mutual company.
In your general position - do average frum families need life ins. past age 60?
IME a majority of ppl who understand WL think that it is worthwhile and buy it or sometimes want to buy it, but just can't afford it.
Therefore, IMO the need to buy term that's blue-chip convertible term is more contingent on the likelihood of the policyholder being in that financial position in the future (or one of the other, less likely scenarios I mentioned).
So you would say that someone should save a dollar and go with a junky company instead of paying a drop more to have their life insurance with a good company? I'll take the Lexus, enjoy your Chrysler T&C  :P

Offline 12HRS

  • Dansdeals Lifetime Presidential Platinum Elite
  • *********
  • Join Date: Jun 2013
  • Posts: 5167
  • Total likes: 577
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 6
    • View Profile
Re: Whole Life Vs. Term Life Insurance
« Reply #489 on: November 14, 2014, 01:14:35 AM »
Private message = don't tell others about it.
or Private message = I don't want to waste the rest of the forums time with information only one person needs.

IME a majority of ppl who understand WL think that it is worthwhile and buy it or sometimes want to buy it, but just can't afford it. I'll take the Lexus, enjoy your Chrysler T&C  :P

You mean they can't afford it because they are putting that extra money into more efficient retirement accounts? I want to buy a Lexus, but even if I could afford it the Chrysler will afford me the opportunity to reach my financial goals that much faster. If after I reached my financial goals and then I wanted to buy a Lexus then it would be something to consider, but not before my house is in order.

Offline Barryg

  • Dansdeals Lifetime Platinum Elite
  • *******
  • Join Date: Nov 2012
  • Posts: 1684
  • Total likes: 63
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 0
    • View Profile
  • Location: Ohio
Re: Whole Life Vs. Term Life Insurance
« Reply #490 on: November 16, 2014, 02:20:04 AM »
or Private message = I don't want to waste the rest of the forums time with information only one person needs.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/private
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/message
You mean they can't afford it because they are putting that extra money into more efficient retirement accounts? I want to buy a Lexus, but even if I could afford it the Chrysler will afford me the opportunity to reach my financial goals that much faster. If after I reached my financial goals and then I wanted to buy a Lexus then it would be something to consider, but not before my house is in order.
Point is that there is a difference, and sometimes (most times) cheaper doesn't mean better. When it comes to 10 year term insurance the extra premium
to buy term that's blue-chip convertible term
is a few dollars at most, and through this term one can buy a Lexus -if needed- in the future instead of a T&C (Vhamayvin Yovin).

Offline ah41187

  • Dansdeals Gold Elite
  • ***
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 181
  • Total likes: 0
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 0
    • View Profile
Re: Whole Life Vs. Term Life Insurance
« Reply #491 on: February 04, 2015, 02:46:30 PM »
Any brokers here with insight for a type 1 diabetic?

Offline Freddie

  • Dansdeals Presidential Platinum Elite
  • ********
  • Join Date: Apr 2013
  • Posts: 3236
  • Total likes: 308
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 1
    • View Profile
  • Location: Pittsburgh
Re: Whole Life Vs. Term Life Insurance
« Reply #492 on: February 04, 2015, 02:47:43 PM »
What would it take to turn this into a popcorn thread?

Offline Mordyk

  • Dansdeals Presidential Platinum Elite
  • ********
  • Join Date: May 2013
  • Posts: 4139
  • Total likes: 1028
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 3
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Programs: Some of this and some of that.
Re: Whole Life Vs. Term Life Insurance
« Reply #493 on: February 04, 2015, 03:59:30 PM »
What would it take to turn this into a popcorn thread?
some popcorn? ;)   (insert that popcorn clip here)
#TYH

Offline ElliS

  • DansDeals Copper Elite
  • *
  • Join Date: Feb 2015
  • Posts: 1
  • Total likes: 0
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 0
    • View Profile
  • Location: Toronto
Re: Whole Life Vs. Term Life Insurance
« Reply #494 on: February 06, 2015, 12:36:02 AM »
The truth is that you can debate this until the cows come home and you still wont have any more clarity. Those that are opposed to whole life will always be opposed to it! What it really comes down to is finding an advisor you can trust and speaking through the pros and cons of each. Granted they make more money selling whole life but that does not make it a bad product. Ultimately it comes down to trying to understand what your family will need beyond 30 years and the best way to provide for them.

Offline DMYD

  • Dansdeals Presidential Platinum Elite
  • ********
  • Join Date: Jul 2013
  • Posts: 2911
  • Total likes: 4
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 1
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Location: Brooklyn
Re: Whole Life Vs. Term Life Insurance
« Reply #495 on: February 06, 2015, 06:24:45 AM »
Any brokers here with insight for a type 1 diabetic?
All companies look at it different,  but the cheaper companies would give a better rate then the better companies. But of course it depends on the situation.

Offline bades

  • Dansdeals Platinum Elite + Lifetime Gold Elite
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 961
  • Total likes: 2
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 0
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Whole Life Vs. Term Life Insurance
« Reply #496 on: February 10, 2015, 07:29:54 PM »
All companies look at it different,  but the cheaper companies would give a better rate then the better companies. But of course it depends on the situation.
+1
You can pm me with questions

Offline turnandburn

  • DansDeals Copper Elite
  • *
  • Join Date: Mar 2015
  • Posts: 6
  • Total likes: 0
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 0
    • View Profile
  • Location: San Diego
Re: Whole Life Vs. Term Life Insurance
« Reply #497 on: May 03, 2015, 12:54:45 PM »
Any brokers here with insight for a type 1 diabetic?

I'm a life/health/disability and long-term care insurance broker located in SoCal, who is licensed in most all 50 states, and can tell you that life insurance carriers typically look at the following with regard to a Type I Diabetic:
-a1c levels (current and past) and whether or not they're controlled?
-insulin type and amount of units taken?
-any other meds taken, if so, what types/dosages?
-height and weight?
-age of onset?

Anyway, I'm not sure if you've gotten a policy in-place, but feel free to PM if you have any questions. I'd also be happy to shop it out to about 25 different underwriters as well, assuming you're interested.

Offline everythinghjosh

  • DansDeals Copper Elite
  • *
  • Join Date: Oct 2014
  • Posts: 15
  • Total likes: 0
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 0
    • View Profile
  • Location: United States
Re: Whole Life Vs. Term Life Insurance
« Reply #498 on: July 21, 2015, 12:35:49 PM »
I am not a broker but have referred a company called Accuquote to many of my friends and family. They spit out for you the cheapest rate by comparing more than a dozen companies. They don't charge an extra fee for this, they give you the companies actual rate. To top it off I have found them to be patient and understanding and will gladly answer your questions and concerns.
 
Fill out a few details online and put your phone number so they can follow up with a five minute conversation. You will be happy you spent the time! No commitments, and they will not harass you for the rest of your life:)   

http://refer.accuquote.com/v2/share/6173999679580837467

Offline DMYD

  • Dansdeals Presidential Platinum Elite
  • ********
  • Join Date: Jul 2013
  • Posts: 2911
  • Total likes: 4
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 1
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Location: Brooklyn
Re: Whole Life Vs. Term Life Insurance
« Reply #499 on: July 21, 2015, 12:45:44 PM »
I am not a broker but have referred a company called Accuquote to many of my friends and family. They spit out for you the cheapest rate by comparing more than a dozen companies. They don't charge an extra fee for this, they give you the companies actual rate. To top it off I have found them to be patient and understanding and will gladly answer your questions and concerns.
 
Fill out a few details online and put your phone number so they can follow up with a five minute conversation. You will be happy you spent the time! No commitments, and they will not harass you for the rest of your life:)   

http://refer.accuquote.com/v2/share/6173999679580837467
Is this only for Canadians?