Topic Wiki

Term insurance vs Whole life

Term insurance is the cheapest and simplest.  You pay a premium and  if chv”sh the insured person dies, the beneficiary gets the insurance amount. The higher the risk a person is, the higher the premium.  So people with worse health  will pay more than healthy people for the same amount of insurance, and older people will pay more than younger people.
Level term.  One popular type of term insurance has a level premium for a fixed number of years. Many people prefer this to the traditional type of term insurance where the premium each each year pays for coverage only in that year (and as a result the premiums increase every year, because you are aging). In contrast, a level premium term insurance policy has an unchanging premium amount that is guaranteed for a specific number of years. As a result of the design you are overpaying in the early years of the policy to subsidize your cost in the later years. Popular guarantee periods are 10, 20 or 30 years.  As with any insurance, it pays to get one while you are healthy to lock in the lowest rate possible (in general, health only declines, you rarely hear of people getting healthier with age).
Return of Premium (ROP) Level term. Same as level term, but with a higher premium. At the end of the level period (e.g. 20 years or 30 years) you get back all of your premiums. Your premium is buying you two things: Part pays for the term insurance, and the other part pays for the cash payment you can get if you are alive at the end and didn't miss any premium payments. If you are mathematically inclined you can calculate an IRR and decide if you see a value in doing this.

The policies below combine "investing" with insurance. As they are front-loaded with large fees and commissions, they typically lose money for a few years and then break even. These rarely make sense for lower to middle class families.
Whole life has a level premium that is guaranteed not to increase for as long as you live. Because of insurance laws in the US, this type of insurance policy must always have a "cash value", which is the amount of money you get back if you cancel the policy. That makes Whole Life a much more expensive choice relative to pure insurance coverage (where you'd get nothing back if you cancel) and therefore a bad choice for most people who are not rich (this is complicated to explain in great detail, but it is an effective summary of who is most likely to see good value in buying Whole Life). One fringe benefit of having a cash value in Whole Life is that you have saved money which can be used for your retirement or any other purpose if you are still alive.  For most people though, other savings vehicles will be better.
Universal life is very similar to whole life, in that it is meant to provide insurance coverage for as long as you live (as opposed to Term, which is meant to for a short to medium period of time). The most important difference is that the premium rates for Universal Life are not guaranteed, unlike Whole Life which is completely guaranteed. The concept behind Universal Life is that the insurance company tells you all the charges you are paying for and lets you pay as much or as little as you want for the coverage. Anything extra that you pay goes into an account that can earn interest, and as long as that account doesn't run out of money you stay insured.
Variable Life is an offshoot of Universal Life. The difference is that instead of the extra money going into an account that earns interest, you can choose to invest the extra money in mutual funds. Take my word as an expert in insurance that Variable Universal Life is only for the most investment oriented people (meaning that they barely care at all about the insurance part of the policy). If you are trying to decide on Term or Variable, the answer is always Term.

Choosing a company
Generally, the companies that focus on term insurance will have the best prices (i.e. rates) for term. Those companies are Banner, SBLI, AIG, etc. If you want to buy term, use a quote aggregator to get quotes from several companies at once. Here is one example of an aggregator (a good one!).
[No one here is getting a commission for this link]
http://www.term4sale.com/
https://www.accuquotelife.com/
https://www.matrixdirect.com/term-life-insurance#fv

If you are looking for Whole Life, Universal Life, or any other permanent product, you won't find quotes on aggregators- you will need to go to a company agent or an independent broker. A simple piece of advice for someone in this position is to get quotes from companies that focus on the product you want. For example, Whole Life is done best by mutual companies (e.g. New York Life, Guardian, Northwestern, Mass Mutual, Penn, Mutual of Omaha). Universal Life (and VUL) are the main products of public stock companies (e.g. Metlife, Prudential, etc.). Most big companies sell all the different types of products, but may not be competitive in price for all of them.

One ddf'er feels strongly that when choosing a company to buy Term from, a major factor is the what "conversion" rights the policy comes with. Conversion is a feature that entitles you to buy Whole Life or Universal Life at some point in the future (presumably when you have more money and can afford the higher priced plans) without being underwritten again - meaning you keep your rating no matter how your health may change. Conversion is certainly a valuable benefit if you anticipate needing permanent insurance at some point, and not all companies are created equal. When evaluating conversion features, you need to look at 1) how long does the conversion right last and 2) what product does the company let you convert to. Many companies offer liberal conversion rights but have bad permanent products, and you need to be educated enough to see through this and value it as a poor option.

Valuable tips for when you apply
Underwriting is the insurance company deciding which rating to give each applicant. They check health and driving record, but do not check credit rating. They can approve with their best rating, or pretty much offer whatever they want as each company has many rate classes.

Different companies can and do give different ratings to the exact same people. So if you don't like the rating one company offered, apply to a different company and maybe you'll be happier. Often, they can use the test results from the other company and you won't need to give blood a second time.

Do not eat for at least 12 hours before blood test. You can drink water.

Pregnant women can apply but most companies view blood work and weight as is. Translation: not wise to apply for life insurance while pregnant... do it before.

Shameless plug  :)
After you've done your own research, you could reach out to a broker to make the purchase. Remember to take advise from a broker with a grain of salt, since he is a salesman and your decision affects his income. Best to come prepared.
Henche's Broker, via ddf recommendation
Heshy Sheldon Breier. 
Worldwide Ins.
T:(718)253-9500
F:(718)252-3426
E:Sheldon@ww-ins.com

Author Topic: Whole Life Vs. Term Life Insurance  (Read 138127 times)

Offline everythinghjosh

  • DansDeals Copper Elite
  • *
  • Join Date: Oct 2014
  • Posts: 15
  • Total likes: 0
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 0
    • View Profile
  • Location: United States
Re: Whole Life Vs. Term Life Insurance
« Reply #500 on: July 21, 2015, 01:20:36 PM »
Not at all?

Offline skyguy918

  • Dansdeals Presidential Platinum Elite
  • ********
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 4077
  • Total likes: 835
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 1
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Location: Queens, NY
Re: Whole Life Vs. Term Life Insurance
« Reply #501 on: July 21, 2015, 03:29:36 PM »
I am not a broker but have referred a company called Accuquote to many of my friends and family. They spit out for you the cheapest rate by comparing more than a dozen companies. They don't charge an extra fee for this, they give you the companies actual rate. To top it off I have found them to be patient and understanding and will gladly answer your questions and concerns.
 
Fill out a few details online and put your phone number so they can follow up with a five minute conversation. You will be happy you spent the time! No commitments, and they will not harass you for the rest of your life:)   

http://refer.accuquote.com/v2/share/6173999679580837467
And if you want to do the same thing much more quickly, without having to put in your personal info, see http://www.term4sale.com/.

Offline ExGingi

  • Dansdeals Lifetime 10K Presidential Platinum Elite
  • *******
  • Join Date: Nov 2015
  • Posts: 17707
  • Total likes: 7964
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 19
    • View Profile
  • Location: 770
  • Programs: בשורת הגאולה. From Exile to Redemption. GIYF. AAdvantage Executive Platinum®
Re: Whole Life Vs. Term Life Insurance
« Reply #502 on: March 18, 2019, 05:37:22 PM »
I've been meaning to revive this thread with my input for a while, but never got a chance.

While this article doesn't seem to be talking about Whole Life policies, but rather Universal Life policies, it's interesting how hedge funds are clamoring to overfund these vehicles, that have great guaranteed rates. Ties a little bit into the PSA side discussion about where one can get best risk-free rates. I didn't bring this up there, because there are charges going in, but once you clear those charges, and if kept to an anniversary, the IRR is great, with some tax advantages and potential asset protection, etc. etc. But there are limits on what one can put in.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-03-18/manulife-wins-legal-battle-as-court-dismisses-hedge-fund-claims?srnd=premium
I've been waiting over 5 years with bated breath for someone to say that!
-- Dan

Offline dealfinder11

  • Dansdeals Platinum Elite + Lifetime Silver Elite
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2017
  • Posts: 583
  • Total likes: 311
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 0
    • View Profile
Re: Whole Life Vs. Term Life Insurance
« Reply #503 on: August 29, 2019, 11:14:11 PM »

Offline skyguy918

  • Dansdeals Presidential Platinum Elite
  • ********
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 4077
  • Total likes: 835
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 1
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Location: Queens, NY
Re: Whole Life Vs. Term Life Insurance
« Reply #504 on: September 02, 2019, 12:54:40 AM »
Curious if any actuaries or brokers have any thoughts on these articles

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/the-life-insurance-indust_b_1937246

https://theinsuranceproblog.com/whole-life-insurance-lapse-rates/
Only skimmed very briefly, but I don't really get the point these articles are trying to make, and they also seem to be misrepresenting how lapses play into pricing. When the actuaries create an assumption for lapses based on historical data, that makes the price of the insurance cheaper for everyone - all else being equal. If they underestimate lapses in their initial pricing, then yes, it will lead to higher profitability for the insurer. But doing so consistently will make you uncompetitive in the market, as it means your initial pricing is higher than another insurer who priced with a more accurate lapse assumption.

Offline ExGingi

  • Dansdeals Lifetime 10K Presidential Platinum Elite
  • *******
  • Join Date: Nov 2015
  • Posts: 17707
  • Total likes: 7964
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 19
    • View Profile
  • Location: 770
  • Programs: בשורת הגאולה. From Exile to Redemption. GIYF. AAdvantage Executive Platinum®
Re: Whole Life Vs. Term Life Insurance
« Reply #505 on: September 02, 2019, 04:34:02 PM »
Only skimmed very briefly, but I don't really get the point these articles are trying to make, and they also seem to be misrepresenting how lapses play into pricing. When the actuaries create an assumption for lapses based on historical data, that makes the price of the insurance cheaper for everyone - all else being equal. If they underestimate lapses in their initial pricing, then yes, it will lead to higher profitability for the insurer. But doing so consistently will make you uncompetitive in the market, as it means your initial pricing is higher than another insurer who priced with a more accurate lapse assumption.

What you say about pricing lapses correctly is true about all elements of pricing.

I am traveling this week, but when I get back I might post expected lapse ratios for life insurance.

Famously, lapse ratios weren't priced correctly with the early generations of Long-Term-Care insurance. That, along with financial repression (ultra low interest rates) brought about a major realignment in the industry.
I've been waiting over 5 years with bated breath for someone to say that!
-- Dan

Offline skyguy918

  • Dansdeals Presidential Platinum Elite
  • ********
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 4077
  • Total likes: 835
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 1
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Location: Queens, NY
Re: Whole Life Vs. Term Life Insurance
« Reply #506 on: September 02, 2019, 08:46:23 PM »
What you say about pricing lapses correctly is true about all elements of pricing.
Yes, of course. And that's my point. The articles make it seem like lapses are some dirty secret of the industry, when in fact from a pricing perspective it's not much different than mortality or investment experience.

Offline dealfinder11

  • Dansdeals Platinum Elite + Lifetime Silver Elite
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2017
  • Posts: 583
  • Total likes: 311
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 0
    • View Profile
Re: Whole Life Vs. Term Life Insurance
« Reply #507 on: September 02, 2019, 09:27:23 PM »
Only skimmed very briefly, but I don't really get the point these articles are trying to make, and they also seem to be misrepresenting how lapses play into pricing. When the actuaries create an assumption for lapses based on historical data, that makes the price of the insurance cheaper for everyone - all else being equal. If they underestimate lapses in their initial pricing, then yes, it will lead to higher profitability for the insurer. But doing so consistently will make you uncompetitive in the market, as it means your initial pricing is higher than another insurer who priced with a more accurate lapse assumption.

I spoke to a broker this week who told me (according to his information) that only 15 percent of Whole Life policies pay off a death benefit (though not all necessarily from lapses).

From an investment standpoint, and i view Whole Life as an investment, are there any other comparable investments that carry that level of fragility/risk with that little upside? Regardless the actual number of lapses, as long is the number isn't below 5%, why would someone take on that risk without knowing what their financial situation might be 15 years away? If you begin to struggle, i would hope you would priorities mortgage and utilities payments over an insurance policy........
« Last Edit: September 02, 2019, 10:19:18 PM by dealfinder11 »

Offline g_t

  • DansDeals Copper Elite
  • *
  • Join Date: Sep 2019
  • Posts: 12
  • Total likes: 38
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 0
    • View Profile
  • Location: usofa
Re: Whole Life Vs. Term Life Insurance
« Reply #508 on: September 02, 2019, 11:21:33 PM »
Can someone explain the risk re. WL lapsing (after a couple of years)? Policyholder gets back all or most (varies by surrender fee from insurer) money paid with additional attractive (esp in this climate) yield on top?
Which also brings us to this exceedingly misleading quote from the 1st article, on which the whole article is based: "Most people pay into a term or whole life policy for years, sometimes hundreds of thousands of dollars, and then allow those same policies to lapse -- and the insurance company never pays out a penny."  And: "the insurance industry likes its profitable business model: Collect a lot of money and pay very little out."
There may be valid arguments to be made against WL, but this ain't one of them.

Offline mercaz1

  • Dansdeals Lifetime Platinum Elite
  • *******
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 2128
  • Total likes: 67
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 1
    • View Profile
  • Location: NY
Re: Whole Life Vs. Term Life Insurance
« Reply #509 on: September 03, 2019, 10:50:45 AM »
I spoke to a broker this week who told me (according to his information) that only 15 percent of Whole Life policies pay off a death benefit (though not all necessarily from lapses).

From an investment standpoint, and i view Whole Life as an investment, are there any other comparable investments that carry that level of fragility/risk with that little upside? Regardless the actual number of lapses, as long is the number isn't below 5%, why would someone take on that risk without knowing what their financial situation might be 15 years away? If you begin to struggle, i would hope you would priorities mortgage and utilities payments over an insurance policy........

you might prioritize the insurance payments if the reason you are struggling is health related and you want to make sure the death benefits will pay out for your family

Offline yos9694

  • Dansdeals Lifetime Platinum Elite
  • *******
  • Join Date: Aug 2012
  • Posts: 1911
  • Total likes: 908
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 6
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Whole Life Vs. Term Life Insurance
« Reply #510 on: September 03, 2019, 02:00:47 PM »
The first article (on fluffpost) has the flavor of someone who just learned a random fact and has tried to draw a bunch of conclusions from it on their own. The author clearly has no more than a layman's grasp of how life insurance companies operate, and seems to buy into the common fallacy that if an insurance contract doesn't pay out then it provided no value. That simply is not true- premiums pay for protection over a specified time period, and in the case of lapsed life insurance, the promised protection was provided. In the case of car insurance, most people understand that the insurance was provided even if no claim was filed, and the same is true for life insurance.

The middle of the article seems to indicate that the purpose of the article is to express the author's displeasure that not enough states are adopting the disclosure act that requires companies to send a specific notification to customers who are about to lapse. It so happens that the disclosure act he references really only exists to inform consumers about life settlements, so if I had to guess, I'd say this author works in the life settlement industry and is looking to promote his own business. Nothing wrong with that, but he should be a bit more educated about his subject matter before writing an article.

The article is from 2012, btw.

Not to go through every fallacy in the article, but a couple of obvious ones are-
  • Complaining that only 2% of term policies pay a death benefit is silly, because the low death claim ratio is the reason that term policies are so cheap
  • Whole life has non-forfeiture values, so a lapse would trigger a cash value payout (if the word "lapse" is being used accurately"
  • The insurance company already has many anti-lapse provisions built in to prevent accidental lapses, such as automatic premium loan and reduced paid up

Offline yos9694

  • Dansdeals Lifetime Platinum Elite
  • *******
  • Join Date: Aug 2012
  • Posts: 1911
  • Total likes: 908
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 6
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Whole Life Vs. Term Life Insurance
« Reply #511 on: September 03, 2019, 02:15:11 PM »
The second article is not so bad.

First the article points out that Term actually pays out to very few customers. That's not a secret, and it's the reason that term is cheap. Next he points out that insurance companies would rather sell you whole than term because it's more profitable. Again, that's not a secret.

He makes an assertion that whole life only pays out a death benefit 15%-20% of the time, and that this is a secret (implying something sinister on the part of the insurance companies). I have no idea if that statistic is correct or not, but I don't see what's sinister about it. He doesn't tell us what happens to the other 80%-85%. What percentage of them surrender the policy to use the cash value? What percentage of them are actually universal life policies that were intended to provide temporary coverage and worked as designed? This statistic might just tell me that whole life is more often used for its secondary benefits than its primary one.

The article doesn't have a conclusion (or it's cut off). But it appears to be leading up to the point that everyone should consider their own personal situation when choosing life insurance, and that's probably good advice.

Offline yos9694

  • Dansdeals Lifetime Platinum Elite
  • *******
  • Join Date: Aug 2012
  • Posts: 1911
  • Total likes: 908
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 6
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Whole Life Vs. Term Life Insurance
« Reply #512 on: September 03, 2019, 02:20:08 PM »
Can someone explain the risk re. WL lapsing (after a couple of years)? Policyholder gets back all or most (varies by surrender fee from insurer) money paid with additional attractive (esp in this climate) yield on top?
Which also brings us to this exceedingly misleading quote from the 1st article, on which the whole article is based: "Most people pay into a term or whole life policy for years, sometimes hundreds of thousands of dollars, and then allow those same policies to lapse -- and the insurance company never pays out a penny."  And: "the insurance industry likes its profitable business model: Collect a lot of money and pay very little out."
There may be valid arguments to be made against WL, but this ain't one of them.

It takes more than just a couple of years before a WL lapse will get back "all or most" of your money. Early lapses are bad for the customer, bad for the insurance company (generally), and only good for the broker.

Offline skyguy918

  • Dansdeals Presidential Platinum Elite
  • ********
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 4077
  • Total likes: 835
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 1
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Location: Queens, NY
Re: Whole Life Vs. Term Life Insurance
« Reply #513 on: September 03, 2019, 11:45:55 PM »
It so happens that the disclosure act he references really only exists to inform consumers about life settlements, so if I had to guess, I'd say this author works in the life settlement industry and is looking to promote his own business. Nothing wrong with that, but he should be a bit more educated about his subject matter before writing an article.
Nice catch. This is him:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Scott_Page

Offline CountValentine

  • Dansdeals Lifetime 10K Presidential Platinum Elite
  • *******
  • Join Date: Mar 2013
  • Posts: 16670
  • Total likes: 7493
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips -1
  • Gender: Female
    • View Profile
  • Location: Poland - Exiled
  • Programs: DAOTYA, DDF Level 3, 5K Lounge
Re: Whole Life Vs. Term Life Insurance
« Reply #514 on: September 04, 2019, 08:51:41 AM »
I have a small (100-150k) WL policy I bought about 30 years ago. I let the dividends accumulate and the premium is paid from them now. Anything better I should be doing?
Only on DDF does 24/6 mean 24/5/half/half

Offline ExGingi

  • Dansdeals Lifetime 10K Presidential Platinum Elite
  • *******
  • Join Date: Nov 2015
  • Posts: 17707
  • Total likes: 7964
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 19
    • View Profile
  • Location: 770
  • Programs: בשורת הגאולה. From Exile to Redemption. GIYF. AAdvantage Executive Platinum®
Re: Whole Life Vs. Term Life Insurance
« Reply #515 on: September 04, 2019, 09:30:09 AM »
I have a small (100-150k) WL policy I bought about 30 years ago. I let the dividends accumulate and the premium is paid from them now. Anything better I should be doing?

Since it’s a well seasoned policy, I would assume that the year-over-year IRR at this point is in somewhere between 3-5%. Not too bad compared to other alternatives with the same liquidity and safety profile. Having the dividends pay the premium rather than paying them out of pocket is somewhat akin to withdrawing interest (or part thereof) rather than letting it all compound. Check the annual increase in the GUARANTEED Cash Value. I would guess that it might be greater than the annual premium. If so the only reason not to pay that small premium out of pocket would be because you have a better place to park money.

Some questions you might want answered are: Is the current insurer still the company that issued the policy? If yes, is that company a mutual insurer or a stock company?

Other than commenting on the IRR as above, it would be highly unprofessional to give any advice on this one piece of a puzzle, without knowing the complete picture.
I've been waiting over 5 years with bated breath for someone to say that!
-- Dan

Offline CountValentine

  • Dansdeals Lifetime 10K Presidential Platinum Elite
  • *******
  • Join Date: Mar 2013
  • Posts: 16670
  • Total likes: 7493
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips -1
  • Gender: Female
    • View Profile
  • Location: Poland - Exiled
  • Programs: DAOTYA, DDF Level 3, 5K Lounge
Re: Whole Life Vs. Term Life Insurance
« Reply #516 on: September 04, 2019, 09:40:35 AM »
I believe they are both the original insurer but changed names.
DW - Brighthouse Financial (MetLife)
Mine - Lincoln Financial Group (Connecticut General)
What other info would be helpful?
Only on DDF does 24/6 mean 24/5/half/half

Offline skyguy918

  • Dansdeals Presidential Platinum Elite
  • ********
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 4077
  • Total likes: 835
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 1
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Location: Queens, NY
Re: Whole Life Vs. Term Life Insurance
« Reply #517 on: September 04, 2019, 12:12:36 PM »
I believe they are both the original insurer but changed names.
DW - Brighthouse Financial (MetLife)
Mine - Lincoln Financial Group (Connecticut General)
What other info would be helpful?
Brighthouse might be considered the same company as Met (since they just sweated that business into a separate company), but LF and CG are totally separate. CIGNA sold their life insurance business to LF 20+ years ago.

Offline CountValentine

  • Dansdeals Lifetime 10K Presidential Platinum Elite
  • *******
  • Join Date: Mar 2013
  • Posts: 16670
  • Total likes: 7493
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips -1
  • Gender: Female
    • View Profile
  • Location: Poland - Exiled
  • Programs: DAOTYA, DDF Level 3, 5K Lounge
Re: Whole Life Vs. Term Life Insurance
« Reply #518 on: September 04, 2019, 01:03:44 PM »
CIGNA sold their life insurance business to LF 20+ years ago.
WOW it has been that long ago?
Only on DDF does 24/6 mean 24/5/half/half

Offline ExGingi

  • Dansdeals Lifetime 10K Presidential Platinum Elite
  • *******
  • Join Date: Nov 2015
  • Posts: 17707
  • Total likes: 7964
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 19
    • View Profile
  • Location: 770
  • Programs: בשורת הגאולה. From Exile to Redemption. GIYF. AAdvantage Executive Platinum®
Re: Whole Life Vs. Term Life Insurance
« Reply #519 on: September 04, 2019, 09:18:43 PM »
I believe they are both the original insurer but changed names.
DW - Brighthouse Financial (MetLife)
Mine - Lincoln Financial Group (Connecticut General)
What other info would be helpful?

None of those are Mutual Companies (any longer). I presume you got stock in the companies at time of demutualization.

You can always ask for an inforce illustration that will show both guaranteed and non-guaranteed figures. You can ask for premium offset vs full pay comparison.
« Last Edit: September 04, 2019, 09:37:01 PM by ExGingi »
I've been waiting over 5 years with bated breath for someone to say that!
-- Dan