Random Posts

[justaregularguy]

Same like that.

Most recent likes are on top.

incorrect. i dont know understand the order within each post but it does not line up with the likes notification

[Just A Jew]

I believe it lists in order of account age. More senior members listed first, which is why it looks like mods are on top.

[HudZ]

I believe it lists in order of account age. More senior members listed first, which is why it looks like mods are on top.

Ok. Everyone like this post for testing reasons.

[Just A Jew]

Ok. Everyone like this post for testing reasons.

This post as in mine or yours?

[username]

Ok. Everyone like this post for testing reasons.

Just post a good deal

[HudZ]

This post as in mine or yours?

Both is good with me.

[mevinyavin]

Both is good with me.

Liked all of the above. @YitzyS these users can teach you a bit about getting likes. You need to launch like experiments - that'll do it.

[Yehudaa]

Couldn't think of a better place to put this, so I'm just gonna drop it here:

https://facts.usps.com/mailing-potatoes/

[username]

This number looks too low.

There are 139,409 iconic blue collection boxes in use on street corners across the nation.

https://facts.usps.com/blue-collection-boxes/

[Randomex]

"NYPD Nixing 'Courtesy, Professionalism, Respect' Slogan on New Patrol Cars for Crime-Focused Motto"
"NYPD cruisers get a new slogan: ‘Fighting crime, protecting the public.’"

It seems to me harder to demonstrate that an officer is failing to fight crime or protect
the public than that an officer is failing to be courteous, professional, and respectful...

[Yehuda57]

Beard hair, but in a Ziploc bag

[TimT]

"NYPD Nixing 'Courtesy, Professionalism, Respect' Slogan on New Patrol Cars for Crime-Focused Motto"
"NYPD cruisers get a new slogan: ‘Fighting crime, protecting the public.’"

More appropriate slogan would be “Where, What, I don’t see, Didn’t Happen”

[YitzyS]

I heard from an expert jury consultant that juror are more likely to convict someone if they know that the day-to-day details of the trial are being covered online. If they think their case is not being scrutinized, they tend to put less credence into the prosecution, and are more easy to assume innocence. But if they know that the details of the case are being reported daily, they pay much more attention and more often convict.

#RandomPost #VehameivinYavin

[Euclid]

I heard from an expert jury consultant that juror are more likely to convict someone if they know that the day-to-day details of the trial are being covered online. If they think their case is not being scrutinized, they tend to put less credence into the prosecution, and are more easy to assume innocence. But if they know that the details of the case are being reported daily, they pay much more attention and more often convict.

#RandomPost #VehameivinYavin

What about a case that's been dragged out so long that even the external public has fatigue

[YitzyS]

What about a case that's been dragged out so long that even the external public has fatigue

Members of the jury likely never heard of the case before. Although they are warned not to look at any media, it seems to be fairly common for them to Google the case anyway. Even if they will find many old articles, their level of awareness goes up if they see daily updates of the case as the trial progresses. So says the expert.

On a side point, regarding public fatigue, I understand the issue tremendously. I feel it tremendously, having been involved in it for more than 5 years. I wish this whole thing could just go away, as I have zero interest in being busy with it. But alas, it is not up to me, and as long as there is a case there, it is my duty to do everything I can to help out.

The defendant's family members are also tired out and fatigued, and they understand that public sentiment is like that also. But there is no getting around putting up a defense and paying big bucks for lawyers. They are really grateful to the public that despite the fatigue, there is still a tremendous outpouring of support. I heard firsthand how the support (both financially and in other ways) has given them so much chizuk. They have been living this for years, and they wish this was over already.

It honestly makes me mad. The state can just put in a fresh set of prosecutors and they have seemingly endless money, while the defendant has no choice but to keep pushing forward every day, raising the funds for a defense and living under constant stress.

[Yehuda57]

I heard from an expert jury consultant that juror are more likely to convict someone if they know that the day-to-day details of the trial are being covered online. If they think their case is not being scrutinized, they tend to put less credence into the prosecution, and are more easy to assume innocence. But if they know that the details of the case are being reported daily, they pay much more attention and more often convict.

#RandomPost #VehameivinYavin

I was just thinking about recent widely covered trials and thought the opposite. I was actually thinking to start a thread  about it, unrelated to the case you are referring to, which I probably will do after Shabbos.

Food for thought
Rittenhouse
Casey Anthony
Karen Read (mistrial, but increasingly clear that the jury was only hung on the most minor of the counts)
Depp (civil case, but as the plaintiff, he in a sense had the burden in a similar way to the prosecution.) (Yes, I know she counter sued as well, but that was almost beside the point)

[YitzyS]

I was just thinking about recent widely covered trials and thought the opposite. I was actually thinking to start a thread  about it, unrelated to the case you are referring to, which I probably will do after Shabbos.

Food for thought
Rittenhouse
Casey Anthony
Karen Read (mistrial, but increasingly clear that the jury was only hung on the most minor of the counts)
Depp (civil case, but as the plaintiff, he in a sense had the burden in a similar way to the prosecution.) (Yes, I know she counter sued as well, but that was almost beside the point)

I think that those cases differ in that there is a clear political aspect to them (at least most of them). In all those cases, the jurors likely came in with some opinion already formed, based on their own political leanings or celebrity fandom. But when they come in knowing nothing, and they suddenly learn that their case is not a random case but a high profile one, they take their duty more seriously. And that ends in more convictions.

I personally would not have assumed this to be true, but I was told this by a person whose expertise is jury consulting.

[Alexsei]

Klaus Schwab’s co-author turns against the WEF, pens novel on Davos racket
“No one was there to improve the state of the world, let alone the state of her own country."

https://www.dossier.today/p/klaus-schwabs-co-author-turns-against

[ExGingi]

Relative of mine called customer service for something... And asked the Indian rep what his name is, so he said; Piyasa, and spelled it out:

P for Pirate
I for India
Y for Yukon
A for Argentina
S for Cinderella!!!!

🤣🤣🤣

Good thing there was no K in the name, or else he would have said K for Knee.

[yfr bachur]

Lol.

A friend of mine once overheard someone speaking loudly on the phone, he was spelling out his name, and when he got to the letter "N", he tried differentiating the N from M, by saying N, as in Avenue N!! True story!

I know someone called Mendel who goves his address as Between Ave M, as in Mendel, and Ave N, as in Mendel.

(@mevinyavin ... who could it be???  )