Total Members Voted: 156
It just seems it would be harder to shoot yourself.
Hey media a bump stock does not turn an AR-15 into full auto. With that said it should still be banned with HCM!!!
Ignorant question. How difficult and how long does it take to switch magazines?
Seconds and a blind person can do it.
So how would banning HCMs make a noticeable difference?
At 10+ rounds a second it would have made a difference, big difference!!!
How many fewer injuries would you estimate had he shot 10 fewer rounds each minute? How about in other mass shootings?
huge numbers less
How?
Now a trivia question for bonus points: Up until the Orlando nightclub massacre, what was the deadliest shooting and what gun(s) were used?
Regardless, to make policy based on mass shootings --which are a tiny fraction of a percent of all gun deaths-- is just ridiculous.
So your answer is do nothing and expect a different result?
No, his answer is to find what will make a difference. Your answer is to do something he feels is irrelevant and get expect different results.
Or do something about the issues that actually are causing the significant percentage of gun deaths.
That's the whole problem with the discussion. The one side always says that won't work but has no idea what will. Then you have the other side that just wants to ban guns. The ones in the middle who understand there is no practical use for HCM and bump stocks among other things get lost in the discussion.