I think I explained very clearly why the second reason is of absolute relevance to the CS debate.Why do you keep saying “multiple factors”? There is one other reason that is given which I incidentally am pointing out is very applicable to the general q of DE.
I’m reading the Teshuva from the perspective that CS is problematic, otherwise there would be no question.
It’s a question about the status of pareve bread from a bakery that also bakes bread kneaded with CS. The answer given is to allow the bread based on a multitude of factors:
א:
1. The idea that milk isn’t considered שמן to be מפעפע
2. The bread is נילוש
(1+2 combine as reasons the Keilim aren’t problematic. But only when both are true)
ב:
1. That milk from non-Kosher animals is uncommon due to government regulations
2. Non-Kosher milk has a different appearance (ostensibly this would be readily visible in white bread vs. other products, but that’s an interpretation you can disagree with me on)
3. There is likely to be שישים to nullify the unkosher milk that is (would be?) mixed in
So in summary the way I read it, CS is assur hence the question, and the decision to permit the
pareve bread (not CS) was only based on the combination of all of the reasons given in both א and ב. At least one of the reasons given (נילוש and arguably also color) is specific to the bakery situation and allowing different pareve breads that at most came in contact with an oven and utensils that touched other breads that had CS kneaded into the dough.
