Any truth to the rumor the Rangers went for Kane because Vladimir Tarasenko is not what they expected in the short stint so far?
Not from anything I’ve heard, and I’ve been following closely. They went after Tarasenko over Kane because his price tag was lower and easier to fit within the cap, also there were greater concerns that his previous injuries were still lingering.
Once Tarasenko was traded we had Kane publicly express his frustration but that seemingly wasn’t enough. Then Kane started showing that he’s still capable of playing at a high level scoring 10 points in 4 games, and pushed even harder for the Rangers. His price tag dropped and Chicago was amenable to a deal, it was an offer too good to refuse. It was basically a done deal since last week before the entire rangers team played a few terrible games.