PSA: Don't swipe recklessly for others

[sillypainter]

Underage teenager alert!

This thread is for adults only. Underage teens not eligible for credit cards should be in READ ONLY mode.

[yossi1]

H

[elimmm]

On a side note, is this whole thing gonna make price of legit AMEX points skyrocket? What percentage of MR resale market were these guys supplying? Seems like a big number to me.

[Chief Rabbi of New York]

Underage teenager alert!

This thread is for adults only. Underage teens not eligible for credit cards should be in READ ONLY mode.

insensitive to the people who just got scammed ?
you dont have to bash them by calling them underage

just give them advice and possible ideas to recoup the losses

[rileywiles23]

On a side note, is this whole thing gonna make price of legit AMEX points skyrocket? What percentage of MR resale market were these guys supplying? Seems like a big number to me.

TARB

[knowitall]

On a side note, is this whole thing gonna make price of legit AMEX points skyrocket? What percentage of MR resale market were these guys supplying? Seems like a big number to me.

Why specifically MR? Cuz biz plat 1.5x on 5k+ swipes?

[shapsam]

Why specifically MR? Cuz biz plat 1.5x on 5k+ swipes?

Much easier to swipe big amounts with Amex, but I'm sure there were plenty people doing this with Chase as well.

[joey89]

Why specifically MR? Cuz biz plat 1.5x on 5k+ swipes?

Amex charge cards also increase your spending over time if you spend a lot and pay back timely

[shapsam]

Insane! Which school?

Bump

[lakewood34]

As a layman i was just wondering that although i understand you cannot dispute the transaction for unauthorized use ,as you gave them permission to swipe but why can't you dispute for goods or services not received. The same way that if you ordered a item online and it never came you can dispute for goods not received (afaik) why can't you dispute that you never received your money .You let them swipe in exchange for money that you never received so you never received what was promised and what the basis of the transaction was -why is that not grounds for dispute ?

[whYME]

As a layman i was just wondering that although i understand you cannot dispute the transaction for unauthorized use ,as you gave them permission to swipe but why can't you dispute for goods or services not received. The same way that if you ordered a item online and it never came you can dispute for goods not received (afaik) why can't you dispute that you never received your money .You let them swipe in exchange for money that you never received so you never received what was promised and what the basis of the transaction was -why is that not grounds for dispute ?

Answering as a layman who doesn't know what he's talking about:
Presumably there's something in the T&C that if you're using the card in a way that's against the T&C (swiping for cash) you're waiving your right to dispute.

[mmgfarb]

i am the rabbi of ddf

Lol, what a joke.

[rileywiles23]

As a layman i was just wondering that although i understand you cannot dispute the transaction for unauthorized use ,as you gave them permission to swipe but why can't you dispute for goods or services not received. The same way that if you ordered a item online and it never came you can dispute for goods not received (afaik) why can't you dispute that you never received your money .You let them swipe in exchange for money that you never received so you never received what was promised and what the basis of the transaction was -why is that not grounds for dispute ?

Because a CC dispute isn't a lomdisheh sugya.

[Yhgfkj]

Lol, what a joke.

same as most rabbis..

[flyingace]

same as most rabbis..

NOT