B"DE Menachem Shtark

[zale]

This link isnt working on mobile.

Maybe because you are still using a Centro? 

Works fine on my Iphone.

[A3]

Almost 1,200 1 star reviews today 😝

Before

Although it's prob the most download app today...

[zale]

Although it's prob the most download app today...

lol not even close. There are apps that get 50,000+ downloads per day.

[george]

The following is a statement from the Orthodox Union:
The New York Post headline Sunday following the gruesome murder of Menachem Stark, “Who didn’t want him dead?” is a violation of every rule of taste, decency and respect that even newspapers that depend on coverage that shocks and titillates must observe. Regarding respect, even if they had none for the victim, certainly they should have demonstrated some feeling for the deceased’s widow and seven children, who are now mourning his loss.

We do not accuse the Post of anti-Semitism. Its strong support of Israel over the years has been most welcome, when publications of a more genteel character have criticized the Jewish state on a regular basis. But the fact that the photo and headline will surely encourage others to be anti-Semitic, or to fuel their already existing anti-Semitism, makes it clear that the headline should simply have read, “Cops Investigate Brutal Murder of Father of Seven.”

I find it very heartening that the OU took its time and thought out its response, rather than impulsively jumping to call the NY Post anti-Semitic. Kudos to the OU for putting seychel first!

[Nitantnel]

The following is a statement from the Orthodox Union:
The New York Post headline Sunday following the gruesome murder of Menachem Stark, “Who didn’t want him dead?” is a violation of every rule of taste, decency and respect that even newspapers that depend on coverage that shocks and titillates must observe. Regarding respect, even if they had none for the victim, certainly they should have demonstrated some feeling for the deceased’s widow and seven children, who are now mourning his loss.

We do not accuse the Post of anti-Semitism. Its strong support of Israel over the years has been most welcome, when publications of a more genteel character have criticized the Jewish state on a regular basis. But the fact that the photo and headline will surely encourage others to be anti-Semitic, or to fuel their already existing anti-Semitism, makes it clear that the headline should simply have read, “Cops Investigate Brutal Murder of Father of Seven.”

I find it very heartening that the OU took its time and thought out its response, rather than impulsively jumping to call the NY Post anti-Semitic. Kudos to the OU for putting seychel first!

And I like it because it's the first statement that is written well

[Centro]

Maybe because you are still using a Centro? 

Works fine on my Iphone.

I didn't try it, my brother tried it on his S3.

[churnbabychurn]

The following is a statement from the Orthodox Union:
The New York Post headline Sunday following the gruesome murder of Menachem Stark, “Who didn’t want him dead?” is a violation of every rule of taste, decency and respect that even newspapers that depend on coverage that shocks and titillates must observe. Regarding respect, even if they had none for the victim, certainly they should have demonstrated some feeling for the deceased’s widow and seven children, who are now mourning his loss.

We do not accuse the Post of anti-Semitism. Its strong support of Israel over the years has been most welcome, when publications of a more genteel character have criticized the Jewish state on a regular basis. But the fact that the photo and headline will surely encourage others to be anti-Semitic, or to fuel their already existing anti-Semitism, makes it clear that the headline should simply have read, “Cops Investigate Brutal Murder of Father of Seven.”

I find it very heartening that the OU took its time and thought out its response, rather than impulsively jumping to call the NY Post anti-Semitic. Kudos to the OU for putting seychel first!

Something is wrong with the sentence structure imho.

#notwrittenwell

[Nitantnel]

Something is wrong with the sentence structure imho.

#notwrittenwell

What's wrong with that sentence?

[avremie]

over 2600 onestar reviews

[yoshi]

Does anyone have any updates?

[churnbabychurn]

What's wrong with that sentence?

First of, its 'while' not 'when'.
Even if fixed it could still be structured better

[danrocks613]

iTunes reviews started posting - all 1s

https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/new-york-post-iphone-edition/id410094240?mt=8

[george]

First of, its 'while' not 'when'.
Even if fixed it could still be structured better

-1
"When" is perfectly fine. You may have chosen to write "while" instead, but that'd be a matter of style.  There is nothing wrong with "when" in that sentence.

[leeboy]

http://www.vosizneias.com/151288/2014/01/03/brooklyn-ny-businessman-abducted-from-his-williamsburg-office/

Please pray for מנחם משולם בן שאניא עטי'ה

See these articles:

http://www.yelp.com/biz/southside-associates-llc-brooklyn?nb=1

http://therealdeal.com/blog/2011/07/12/israel-perlmuter-known-as-sam-perl-and-menachem-stark-face-51m-in-property-suits-over-williamsburg-and-greenpoint-developments/

By posting those articles you are implying that there is good reason for this tragedy.
Just so happens to be that most rental complexes have terrible reviews just because most people are complainers especially lower class rental complexes.

[Nitantnel]

By posting those articles you are implying that there is good reason for this tragedy.

Give him a break. He wrote it before anyone knew how this would end.

[churnbabychurn]

-1
"When" is perfectly fine. You may have chosen to write "while" instead, but that'd be a matter of style.  There is nothing wrong with "when" in that sentence.

When is for a point in time, while is for a duration.
Its wrong.

[george]

When is for a point in time, while is for a duration.
Its wrong.

B.S.

"Hey, Josh, ya 'member the good old days when you and I would hang out all the time?"
"Hey, Josh, ya 'member the good old days while you and I would hang out all the time?"

You are welcome to continue to argue, but don't make up rules.

[Freddie]

When is for a point in time, while is for a duration.
Its wrong.

You're telling him about the difference between when and while, while you just wrote "Its wrong"? Man!

BTW why are we bickering about grammar on a thread about a shocking, sickening tragedy?

[george]

You're telling him about the difference between when and while, while you just wrote "Its wrong"? Man!

BTW why are we bickering about grammar on a thread about a shocking, sickening tragedy?

Good point.
I'll disengage now.
Thanks for pointing that out.

[churnbabychurn]

B.S.

"Hey, Josh, ya 'member the good old days when you and I would hang out all the time?"
"Hey, Josh, ya 'member the good old days while you and I would hang out all the time?"

You are welcome to continue to argue, but don't make up rules.

you're misunderstanding. The good old days is "back in the day" -a point in time. When two things happened over time, simultaneously its while.

See link if you want to perfect your English.

http://www.perfectyourenglish.com/usage/as-when-while.htm