+1
Interesting how in the same post where he wrote that one can't say that a wrong set of facts was presented he goes on to write that someone who is certainly one of the biggest talmidei chachomim in America will let the revenue of an organization trump halacha:o:-\
I don't believe rav belsky considers the pesak of gedoley haposkim in EY as "binding halach". So for him he is not trumping " halach". It never is...
Back to the fish, I suggest you actually read some of these kuntrisim, you will find that there is very little debate about the facts.
There are questions how to how to interpret these facts, and obviously machlokesim in halacha.
The gedoley haposkim all asser, and to dismiss them as "uninformed" on a sheila that has been debated and discussed extensively throughout the world, is very wrong.