Random questions.

[TimT]

A tweet of a video belongs in interesting videos or interesting tweets thread ?

[Lurker]

A tweet of a video belongs in interesting videos or interesting tweets thread ?

If tweets of things needed to go in threads of the things they were about, there would be no tweets thread.

[TimT]

If tweets of things needed to go in threads of the things they were about, there would be no tweets thread.

Nu, shnell. I’ve got stuff to post.

[Yehuda57]

If tweets of things needed to go in threads of the things they were about, there would be no tweets thread.

Put that in a tweet OIDH

[YitzyS]

Well, that's precisely the paradox here:

If videos of things needed to go in threads of the things they were about, there would be no videos thread.

[Randomex]

A tweet of a video belongs in interesting videos or interesting tweets thread ?

Videos thread. Twitter isn't a dedicated video-sharing platform, and
people don't necessarily come to the tweets thread expecting videos.

[Lurker]

Put that in a tweet OIDH

No Twitter... Do you sell Tweets?

[Lurker]

Well, that's precisely the paradox here:

Not quite a paradox. The thread titles are inclusive of things which may fall into other categories, but can be posted in the general Tweets/Pictures/Videos threads by virtue of being interesting, funny, or random. The dilemma is where to post without violating the 12th Commandment of "Thou shalt not cross-post." Personally, I'd x-post with a disclaimer, and brace for the ire of the x-post police.

[Randomex]

Not an issue:

"12. No cross-posting.  Do not make the same post on 2 different boards or threads."

Interestingly:

Crossposting is the act of posting the same message to multiple information channels; forums, mailing lists, or newsgroups. This is distinct from multiposting, which is the posting of separate identical messages, individually, to each channel, (a forum, a newsgroup, an email list, or topic area).

There's info there about why you would (true-)crosspost: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crossposting

[Randomex]

The video should've gone in the video thread and the joke in the puns thread.

[Lurker]

A tweet of a video belongs in interesting videos or interesting tweets thread ?

A Tweet that's about Covid and the NFL... where do I post it? Covid board Tweets, or JS funny Tweets?

[Randomex]

(Does anyone seriously care about multiposting?) I'd say it goes in the funny thread if it's funny.

[Yehuda57]

No Twitter... Do you sell Tweets?

But of course. Can you tell who the buyers are for each of these? https://twitter.com/Squilled

[Lurker]

But of course. Can you tell who the buyers are for each of these? https://twitter.com/Squilled

Thanks for the Twitter rabbit hole. I didn't really see any paid posts, although there was plenty of product placement. DD seems to be on a monthly plan.

[Lurker]

"The community of Waldsolms posthumously thanks the Wedel couple for this important inheritance," the community said in a statement.

When a sentence is structured like the one above, is the thanks being given after the couple's death or the community's?

[YitzyS]

When a sentence is structured like the one above, is the thanks being given after the couple's death or the community's?

+1

This would be better:

"The community of Waldsolms thanks the Wedel couple, posthumously, for this important inheritance," the community said in a statement.

[Lurker]

+1

This would be better:

"The community of Waldsolms thanks the Wedel couple, posthumously, for this important inheritance," the community said in a statement.

I think the word is superfluous. It's an inheritance.

[Yehuda57]

I think the word is superfluous. It's an inheritance.

Maybe the Wedels were the community.

[Euclid]

Alright, which one of y'all is this, with a username of OyVeizMeir?

https://reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/k7at4e/what_loophole_did_you_exploit_for_years_before/geqgpzh

[Yehudaa]

Can anyone help me identify this font?

Thanks.