https://twitter.com/MaddowBlog/status/1385418116197388291
for something they *allegedly* didFTFY
The SCOTUS case is about things they were convicted of.
exactlyunlike what he was accused of
Any thoughts on Carson v. Makin.Will this help mosdos?Will this create an engagement?
Would like anyones take on this but especially @imayid2 https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/supreme-court-reverses-course-on-religious-school-s-lgbtq-club-in-5-4-vote/ar-AA11PZ6M?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=e99e623cc2094ad9ae3f7618116161a9
Don’t count your chickens before they hatch.
Don’t count your eggs before the chicken lays them.
If I correctly understood the article, the decision was based on procedure and not merits based. So I guess nothing to take on this one.
I was surprised they reversed course with D appointee giving the original ruling.
The only interesting part of the ruling is the courts alignment
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/the-supreme-court-hands-the-religious-right-an-unexpected-loss-don-t-expect-it-to-last/ar-AA11SfCO?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=b38e60e4eb88408daba15e622be544d2
Very interesting analysis
I thought it was so that is why I posted it. I wish others would do the same even if it doesn't support their position and or beliefs. No, I am not talking about you.