Supreme Court of the United States Recent Rulings

[aygart]

https://twitter.com/MaddowBlog/status/1385418116197388291

[CountValentine]

https://twitter.com/MaddowBlog/status/1385418116197388291

LOL

[gozalim]

https://twitter.com/MaddowBlog/status/1385418116197388291

for something they *allegedly* did
FTFY

[aygart]

for something they *allegedly* did
FTFY

The SCOTUS case is about things they were convicted of.

[gozalim]

The SCOTUS case is about things they were convicted of.

exactly
unlike what he was accused of

[aygart]

exactly
unlike what he was accused of

Doesn't change the irony

[ellemeno]

Any thoughts on Carson v. Makin.
Will this help mosdos?
Will this create an engagement?

[Ver hut gazugt]

Any thoughts on Carson v. Makin.
Will this help mosdos?
Will this create an engagement?

Not sure how much it will help yeshivos. As this case was with certified schools afaik.
It probably gives a boost though.

[CountValentine]

Would like anyones take on this but especially @imayid2
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/supreme-court-reverses-course-on-religious-school-s-lgbtq-club-in-5-4-vote/ar-AA11PZ6M?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=e99e623cc2094ad9ae3f7618116161a9

[imayid2]

Would like anyones take on this but especially @imayid2
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/supreme-court-reverses-course-on-religious-school-s-lgbtq-club-in-5-4-vote/ar-AA11PZ6M?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=e99e623cc2094ad9ae3f7618116161a9

Don’t count your chickens before they hatch.

[CountValentine]

Don’t count your chickens before they hatch.

I am not counting anything.

[joe1234]

Don’t count your eggs before the chicken lays them.

FTFY
just needed to set the record straight...

[ellemeno]

Would like anyones take on this but especially @imayid2
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/supreme-court-reverses-course-on-religious-school-s-lgbtq-club-in-5-4-vote/ar-AA11PZ6M?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=e99e623cc2094ad9ae3f7618116161a9

If I correctly understood the article, the decision was based on procedure and not merits based. So I guess nothing to take on this one.

[CountValentine]

If I correctly understood the article, the decision was based on procedure and not merits based. So I guess nothing to take on this one.

I was surprised they reversed course with D appointee giving the original ruling.

[ellemeno]

I was surprised they reversed course with D appointee giving the original ruling.

The only interesting part of the ruling is the courts alignment

[CountValentine]

The only interesting part of the ruling is the courts alignment

I didn't notice but guessing Roberts was the fifth vote?

[CountValentine]

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/the-supreme-court-hands-the-religious-right-an-unexpected-loss-don-t-expect-it-to-last/ar-AA11SfCO?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=b38e60e4eb88408daba15e622be544d2

[aygart]

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/the-supreme-court-hands-the-religious-right-an-unexpected-loss-don-t-expect-it-to-last/ar-AA11SfCO?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=b38e60e4eb88408daba15e622be544d2

Very interesting analysis

[CountValentine]

Very interesting analysis

I thought it was so that is why I posted it. I wish others would do the same even if it doesn't support their position and or beliefs.

No, I am not talking about you. 

[imayid2]

I thought it was so that is why I posted it. I wish others would do the same even if it doesn't support their position and or beliefs.

No, I am not talking about you. 

I haven’t read it yet.