Iran nuclear deal

[zale]

All people think they are the most moral and are correct in their beliefs. To think otherwise is a little narrow minded.

Actually, White liberal Americans believe that we are immoral. In fact, they believe that they themselves are immoral. It's some type of guilt-related sickness.

[yesitsme]

Obama is good to the USA as good he is to ISRAEL

[aygart]

Actually, White liberal Americans believe that we are immoral. In fact, they believe that they themselves are immoral. It's some type of guilt-related sickness.

I am under the impression that this concept is part of Christian theology that the whole world are sinners and would be punished if not for his death it something like that. Paging cm.

[ChaimMoskowitz]

Paging cm.

zale is so far out there on this one it is not even worth a response.

[Aj3042]

Actually, White liberal Americans believe that we are immoral. In fact, they believe that they themselves are immoral. It's some type of guilt-related sickness.

Yes well said. We are immoral unless we aid our enemies. It's got to be called suicide aiding sickness or something.

[ChaimMoskowitz]

Yes well said Rush.

FTFY

[Aj3042]

FTFY

@Zale's name is Rush? Is that his first name or last name?
FTR I don't listen to talk radio of any sort. I know it is common for people to point fingers as you do, saying "you heard it from him or himl as if that undermines one's credibility. Even for those that did originally hear this from Rush that's fine as he's one of the only people that goes against the liberal media and  introduces a dissenting opinion. Can't a person hear a view from another and be persuaded? Isn't that how intelligent people work-hear views then decide? So what's the problem if Rush says something, and someone weighs again the liberal media and accepts it?

[ChaimMoskowitz]

All I meant was that type of comment would come from Rush. FTR intelligent people should know better to get their info from Rush or someone like Rachel Maddow from the other extreme.

[Aj3042]

All I meant was that type of comment would come from Rush. FTR intelligent people should know better to get their info from Rush or someone like Rachel Maddow from the other extreme.

LOL I am intelligent enough to realize you were not exposing @Zale's name but rather his alleged source of information which you seem to think you are privy to. Regardless though from his posts he seems more than intelligent enough to hear opinions from whoever and decide things for himself. He is often one of the most coherent and well written posters in debates, whether you agree with him or not.

[ChaimMoskowitz]

I am intelligent enough to realize you were not exposing @Zale's name but rather his alleged source of information which you seem to think you are privy to.

Then you are not as smart as you think you are. I have no idea what his source is for that off the wall comment and would like to know what it is.

Regardless though from his posts he seems more than intelligent enough to hear opinions from whoever and decide things for himself. He is often one of the most coherent and well written posters in debates, whether you agree with him or not.

I never said he wasn't. The comment in question seems off the wall to me and something that would come from an extreme position like Rush.

[clear thinker]

If booker votes for the deal than all those frum activist buddies of his got a lot of explaining to do

How about Schumer?
Who calls himself "shomer of israel"??

[aygart]

like those who feel they need to convince every single person of every small political or hashkafic mistake in very strong language.

Yes those are the most evil of all.

[elit]

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-worst-agreement-in-us-diplomatic-history/2015/07/02/960e8cf2-20e8-11e5-aeb9-a411a84c9d55_story.html?postshare=2551437018352933

[ChaimMoskowitz]

What is the chances congress shoots this down?

[clear thinker]

What is the chances congress shoots this down?

Slim imo, but who knows....
The fact that there are so many dems undecided looks bad for them.

[elit]

What is the chances congress shoots this down?

Very little.  An article I saw a few days ago broke down where each senator stood on the issue and of the 24 undecided they would need 15 to vote against to have 2/3s to override obama veto

[clear thinker]

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2015/07/14/whip-count-where-the-senate-stands-on-the-iran-deal/

More senators went over to the no/leaning no side.

[clear thinker]

Very little.  An article I saw a few days ago broke down where each senator stood on the issue and of the 24 undecided they would need 15 to vote against to have 2/3s to override obama veto

More senators went over to the no/leaning no side.

[Baruch]

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2015/07/16/obama-keeps-helping-critics-of-the-iran-deal/

[Aj3042]

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2015/07/16/obama-keeps-helping-critics-of-the-iran-deal/

Boy if the Washington Post already doesn't like it that's not good for Obama. They're not exactly hard core conservatives to put it mildly.