The funny/strange/interesting/random pictures thread

[Dan]

.

[ShlockDoc]

Wow. So much interesting info.  Maybe time for mobile optimization?   

[Dan]

Wow. So much interesting info.  Maybe time for mobile optimization?   

Are you implying that DD is desktop optimized?
Not really optimized for anything, other than 2004.

[whYME]

Are you implying that DD is desktop optimized?
Not really optimized for anything, other than 2004.

lol I was gonna say that

[Dan]

Website designers can inquire within

[ShlockDoc]

Website designers can inquire within

I'd recommend the firm I work for but while they would do an amazing design, user experience, and technology job for you, they aren't as cheap as some folks you'll probably find around here...

[aygart]

Are you implying that DD is desktop optimized?
Not really optimized for anything, other than 2004.

So you mean optimized for internet explorer.

[Red]

So you mean optimized for internet explorer.

Netscape Navigator 

[yitrap]

[/img]

My captions for this iconic/controversial image:
"Two birds with one stoner."
"One picture can be worth a thousand... birds."
"KFC. Finger lickin' good."
"Guess where this finger has just been."
"Buchrim going out with chicks."
"Watch me flip you off as I get ready to flip the chicken over my head."
I'll add more as I think of them. What are your captions? Up to 25 points per entry, 12 entries per family. — with Rina Deych.

[Knaper_Chuchem]

http://goo.gl/OfBl6T

[ual902]

This is more accurate:


 

[DMYD]

This is more accurate:


 

Ha ha good one!

[ShlockDoc]

Ha ha good one!

To quote a friend on Facebook:

The kid is saying I don't care, this is my tradition, and I'm going to keep it alive so screw you PETA. And I respect that 110 percent. I only wish he was defending the honor and integrity of something authentically Jewish, and not something borrowed from pagans. Also, if we're going to draw lines in the sand, why do they have to drawn over optional, marginally important rituals that involve the unnecessary torture of animals?

[maxie m]

To quote a friend on Facebook:

not an overly bright friend

[ShlockDoc]

not an overly bright friend

I don't agree with him that they are torturing animals. But he's historically correct that the custom does have non-jewish roots. 

[Centro]

I don't agree with him that they are torturing animals. But he's historically correct that  the chicken custom doesn't have jewish roots.

Huh?

[Moshe123]

I don't agree with him that they are torturing animals. But he's historically correct that the custom does have non-jewish roots. 

1,500 years is enough for me.

[stbaum]

lol

Good thing she wasn't messing with the Shochet....

ALOL

[churnbabychurn]

I don't agree with him that they are torturing animals. But he's historically correct that the custom does have non-jewish roots.

That is the opinion of the mechaber.
The  Ramo and many others disagree. They say this is a minhag from the gaonim and before.
So he is historically incorrect according to minhag Ashkenazim who follow Ramo and most sefardim also.

[DMYD]

To quote a friend on Facebook:

A clueless friend. Indeed!