US Politics/2016 Election Pick Your Poison Master Thread

[aygart]

Of course not they wouldn't trust them about it

[Yehuda57]

So if BO proposed it do you believe 50%+ R's would support it?

https://twitter.com/charlescwcooke/status/895637518254833664

[ilherman]

You really need to get your head out of the sand. His exact words were: North Korea best not make any more threats to the United States.

That lasted a few hours before they then threatened Guam a US territory. I guess that doesn't count.

If you want to rag on BO, HRC or any other D go right ahead. Just don't use it to justify what this lunatic says.

Thanks for taking his words out of context again. Where did he say that if they make threats he will attack them. Pls bring facts.

[ilherman]

Have you heard of Vietnam? 

Of course a war has consequences. But to make it sound that the US has no way to win a war with NK without killing millions of SKs is total non sense.

[ChaimMoskowitz]

Thanks for taking his words out of context again. Where did he say that if they make threats he will attack them. Pls bring facts.

Are you kidding me?
First you claim it was fake news that he never said that. I posted the exact words. You just keep digging the whole deeper and deeper.

[ChaimMoskowitz]

Of course a war has consequences. But to make it sound that the US has no way to win a war with NK without killing millions of SKs is total non sense.

How do you stop an attack on Seoul which would result in mass casualties? Would you be saying the same thing if NK bordered Israel?

[aygart]

What are appropriate grounds to begin investigating something? The standard the Dems promote regarding voter fraud or the one they promote regarding collusion?

[elit]

https://www.axios.com/inside-drudges-new-look-2471319917.html

[ilherman]

Are you kidding me?
First you claim it was fake news that he never said that. I posted the exact words. You just keep digging the whole deeper and deeper.

First I said? I still say. And with all the fancy talk you still did show me where he put the red line that the next time NK threats us we will attack them with fire and fury.

Btw in case you are not updated the president showing again he will not be let down by the MSM said that fire and fury were not tough enough.

[ilherman]

How do you stop an attack on Seoul which would result in mass casualties? Would you be saying the same thing if NK bordered Israel?

No body said that it's a good option. All I said is that if it comes to a stage where NK poses an immediate threat to the US the president WILL take action to protect us. Not because it's fun at all but because it's his duty as president.

Now the point I made was that I do believe the American military has several strategies in taking out the NK military in the matter of a short time to prevent a counterattack. Again of course there are many scenarios which may end up happening. I'm just pointing out that the US is not as slow as you may wanna think.

[aygart]

https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/272554/

[aygart]

https://zogbyanalytics.com/news/788-trump-approval-at-45-support-among-hispanics-west-and-union-voters-jumps-double-digits

[zh cohen]

https://zogbyanalytics.com/news/788-trump-approval-at-45-support-among-hispanics-west-and-union-voters-jumps-double-digits

Pretty sure Zogby is not considered a reliable pollster

[ChaimMoskowitz]

First I said? I still say. And with all the fancy talk you still did show me where he put the red line that the next time NK threats us we will attack them with fire and fury.

You just won't take your head out of the sand, will you?

"North Korea best not make any more threats to the United States. They will be met with fire and fury, like the world has never seen."

[aygart]

https://www.wsj.com/articles/trumps-irs-swamp-1502405528

[aygart]

You just won't take your head out of the sand, will you?

"North Korea best not make any more threats to the United States. They will be met with fire and fury, like the world has never seen."

They will be met with fire and fury, like the world has never seen if they do what? Is there more to the context than just this, because this is very weak.

[ilherman]

You just won't take your head out of the sand, will you?

"North Korea best not make any more threats to the United States. They will be met with fire and fury, like the world has never seen."

So as you know (because afaik you are smart) for the 4th time you are trying to take the President's word out of context. The president never said he will send fire if he makes threats. What everyone including you understood was that if they will be a physical immediate threat to the US we will respond forcefully. And the MSM is in full hysteria mode how come Trump is not following the failed appeasement policy which we had the past 25 years. So they try to twist his words. And you seem to help them. Thanks for trying.

[skyguy918]

So as you know (because afaik you are smart) for the 4th time you are trying to take the President's word out of context. The president never said he will send fire if he makes threats. What everyone including you understood was that if they will be a physical immediate threat to the US we will respond forcefully. And the MSM is in full hysteria mode how come Trump is not following the failed appeasement policy which we had the past 25 years. So they try to twist his words. And you seem to help them. Thanks for trying.

Just to be clear, he's not twisting Trump's words. The way his statement was constructed it reads most coherently in the way CM is interpreting it. And yet, I completely agree with you about what Trump was trying to say. But that's the problem - while he may 'have the best words', he struggles to string them together properly.

[ChaimMoskowitz]

So as you know (because afaik you are smart) for the 4th time you are trying to take the President's word out of context. The president never said he will send fire if he makes threats. What everyone including you understood was that if they will be a physical immediate threat to the US we will respond forcefully. And the MSM is in full hysteria mode how come Trump is not following the failed appeasement policy which we had the past 25 years. So they try to twist his words. And you seem to help them. Thanks for trying.

Typical Trumpster response. I didn't twist anything. That was an exact quote, word for word. That's what happens when this idiot thinks for himself. He says idiotic things just like his lunatic counterpart.

Why is it ever time he says stupid things like this you (Trumpsters) have to explain what he meant? Why not just admit he is an idiot and be done with it?

[ilherman]

Typical Trumpster response. I didn't twist anything. That was an exact quote, word for word. That's what happens when this idiot thinks for himself. He says idiotic things just like his lunatic counterpart.

Why is it ever time he says stupid things like this you (Trumpsters) have to explain what he meant? Why not just admit he is an idiot and be done with it?

Okay for the final time. I am about to give up. Where did he say that Fire and fury will be a direct response to the next threat?