Author Topic: US Politics/2016 Election Pick Your Poison Master Thread (Read 3853172 times)

ChaimMoskowitz · « **Reply #16380 on:** January 17, 2018, 09:33:58 AM »

Quote from: aygart on January 17, 2018, 09:31:43 AM

And that would be why he leaked like a faucet and gave access to the author.

He already apologized and backtracked on what he said. You need to get out of your bubble and look at the whole picture.

avromie7 · « **Reply #16381 on:** January 17, 2018, 09:36:41 AM »

Quote from: ChaimMoskowitz on January 17, 2018, 09:33:58 AM

He already apologized and backtracked on what he said. You need to get out of your bubble and look at the whole picture.

Quote from: aygart on January 16, 2018, 11:10:20 PM

And you call others gullible?

aygart · « **Reply #16382 on:** January 17, 2018, 09:39:07 AM »

Quote from: ChaimMoskowitz on January 17, 2018, 09:33:58 AM

He already apologized and backtracked on what he said. You need to get out of your bubble and look at the whole picture.

So you feel that words speak louder than actions. That explains many of your positions here.

ChaimMoskowitz · « **Reply #16383 on:** January 17, 2018, 09:46:33 AM »

Quote from: aygart on January 17, 2018, 09:39:07 AM

So you feel that words speak louder than actions. That explains many of your positions here.

Lets talk about his recent actions. He volunteered to testified before congress. He then refuses to answer questions under the cover Trump/WH gave him of EP.
1 - He refused to answer as not to incriminate himself
2 - He is protecting Trump/WH
3 - If he wanted to burn Trump he would tell all.
4 - He did testify about the book and called it hyperbole (exaggerated statements or claims not meant to be taken literally).

Anything I am missing?

aygart · « **Reply #16384 on:** January 17, 2018, 09:48:10 AM »

Quote from: ChaimMoskowitz on January 17, 2018, 09:46:33 AM

Lets talk about his recent actions. He volunteered to testified before congress. He then refuses to answer questions under the cover Trump/WH gave him of EP.
1 - He refused to answer as not to incriminate himself
2 - He is protecting Trump/WH
3 - If he wanted to burn Trump he would tell all.
4 - He did testify about the book and called it hyperbole (exaggerated statements or claims not meant to be taken literally).

Anything I am missing?

3 would only burn trump if there is something to hide.

ChaimMoskowitz · « **Reply #16385 on:** January 17, 2018, 09:53:52 AM »

Quote from: aygart on January 17, 2018, 09:48:10 AM

3 would only burn trump if there is something to hide.

So you believe he didn't testify to make it look like he had something to hide which in turn means he wants everyone to believe the President is hiding something?

davidrotts63 · « **Reply #16386 on:** January 17, 2018, 09:56:35 AM »

Quote from: ChaimMoskowitz on January 17, 2018, 09:53:52 AM

So you believe he didn't testify to make it look like he had something to hide which in turn means he wants everyone to believe the President is hiding something?

Or just because there is nothing hiding that would burn Trump,

TimT · « **Reply #16387 on:** January 17, 2018, 10:10:10 AM »

Quote from: ChaimMoskowitz on January 17, 2018, 09:33:58 AM

He already apologized and backtracked on what he said.

If you can’t see the hatred for Trump & team coming out of his eyes then it’s time for a new prescription. Bannon doesn’t just forgive & forget. The only reason he would want to get back in the WH is to destroy everybody there.

ChaimMoskowitz · « **Reply #16388 on:** January 17, 2018, 10:12:13 AM »

Quote from: davidrotts63 on January 17, 2018, 09:56:35 AM

Or just because there is nothing hiding that would burn Trump,

So he is doing this to give the impression there is things to burn Trump because he hates him?

aygart · « **Reply #16389 on:** January 17, 2018, 10:29:30 AM »

Quote from: ChaimMoskowitz on January 17, 2018, 09:53:52 AM

So you believe he didn't testify to make it look like he had something to hide which in turn means he wants everyone to believe the President is hiding something?

You are working based off the liberal assumption that Trump ordered the Russians to hack Hillary. You need to get out of your box a bit. That was one point which was based on your assumptions. There are more.

"Contradictions do not exist. Whenever you think you are facing a contradiction, check your premises. You will find that one of them is wrong."
Francisco d'Anconia

aygart · « **Reply #16390 on:** January 17, 2018, 10:30:10 AM »

Yammer · « **Reply #16391 on:** January 17, 2018, 10:43:00 AM »

Quote from: ChaimMoskowitz on January 17, 2018, 09:46:33 AM

Lets talk about his recent actions. He volunteered to testified before congress. He then refuses to answer questions under the cover Trump/WH gave him of EP.
1 - He refused to answer as not to incriminate himself
2 - He is protecting Trump/WH
3 - If he wanted to burn Trump he would tell all.
4 - He did testify about the book and called it hyperbole (exaggerated statements or claims not meant to be taken literally).

Anything I am missing?

While telling everyone that we need to wait and see how the Muller investigation pans out ( which I agree ).you then jump to conclusions on assumptions.

Stonewalling Congress, and not answering questions happen all the time. While it "could" be that its because of collusion you seem to have decided already that Bannon is guilty.

ChaimMoskowitz · « **Reply #16392 on:** January 17, 2018, 10:51:55 AM »

Quote from: Yammer on January 17, 2018, 10:43:00 AM

While telling everyone that we need to wait and see how the Muller investigation pans out ( which I agree ).you then jump to conclusions on assumptions.

Stonewalling Congress, and not answering questions happen all the time. While it "could" be that its because of collusion you seem to have decided already that Bannon is guilty.

Not at all. The gullibles are trying to twist the issue as always. I have no idea who did what. All we can do is go by what someone does or says.

He called the book "hyperbole" in his testimony before congress. He took Trump/WH cover and did not answer questions claiming EP. I gave ideas why I think he did it. The gullibles just attack what I say without giving a reason why he did it. Both of those two examples show he is protecting the president. That does not mean the president needs protecting.

ChaimMoskowitz · « **Reply #16393 on:** January 17, 2018, 10:53:15 AM »

Quote from: aygart on January 17, 2018, 10:29:30 AM

You are working based off the liberal assumption that Trump ordered the Russians to hack Hillary.

You can try and twist this anyway you want. We have no idea what Muller is investigating.

TimT · « **Reply #16394 on:** January 17, 2018, 10:54:57 AM »

Quote from: ChaimMoskowitz on January 17, 2018, 10:53:15 AM

We have no idea what Muller is investigating.

This is the big issue many have with this. He was hired to investigate something very specific.

ChaimMoskowitz · « **Reply #16395 on:** January 17, 2018, 10:59:05 AM »

Quote from: TimT on January 17, 2018, 10:54:57 AM

This is the big issue many have with this. He was hired to investigate something very specific.

You can claim that but it is not back up with any facts. He has very broad powers on what to investigate.

Yammer · « **Reply #16396 on:** January 17, 2018, 11:00:32 AM »

Quote from: ChaimMoskowitz on January 17, 2018, 10:51:55 AM

I gave ideas why I think he did it.

And all of them are saying that Bannon is hiding something that would incriminate him or Trump...

That's effectively saying that you believe that Bannon is guilty.

aygart · « **Reply #16397 on:** January 17, 2018, 11:01:06 AM »

http://money.cnn.com/2018/01/16/media/trump-hotels-yelp/index.html

aygart · « **Reply #16398 on:** January 17, 2018, 11:02:30 AM »

Quote from: TimT on January 17, 2018, 10:54:57 AM

This is the big issue many have with this. He was hired to investigate something very specific.

Quote from: ChaimMoskowitz on January 17, 2018, 10:59:05 AM

You can claim that but it is not back up with any facts. He has very broad powers on what to investigate.

Those two are not mutually exclusive and that is a big part of the problem.

ChaimMoskowitz · « **Reply #16399 on:** January 17, 2018, 11:04:13 AM »

Quote from: Yammer on January 17, 2018, 11:00:32 AM

And all of them are saying that Bannon is hiding something that would incriminate him or Trump...

That's effectively saying that you believe that Bannon is guilty.

IMHO Bannon wants to get in the Presidents good graces again and this shows he is still loyal to the President. This has nothing to do with if Trump did anything wrong. Not sure how I can make it any clearer!!!

Topic Wiki

Poll

Who are you voting for?

Author Topic: US Politics/2016 Election Pick Your Poison Master Thread (Read 3853172 times)