Author Topic: US Politics/2016 Election Pick Your Poison Master Thread (Read 3864709 times)

ChaimMoskowitz · « **Reply #17240 on:** January 26, 2018, 11:07:50 AM »

Quote from: aygart on January 26, 2018, 11:05:55 AM

Can you say constitutional crisis caused entirely by the Dems trying to answer how they lost?

Mueller is a life long R. NEXT!!!

ChaimMoskowitz · « **Reply #17241 on:** January 26, 2018, 11:08:39 AM »

Quote from: aygart on January 26, 2018, 11:07:07 AM

Then I misunderstood you and have no clue what you were trying to say.

Agree.

Yammer · « **Reply #17242 on:** January 26, 2018, 11:09:42 AM »

Quote from: ChaimMoskowitz on January 26, 2018, 11:00:21 AM

It doesn't happen often but you are mistaken.

You're right. This line got me confused...

Fox

"The Times also reported that Trump considered firing Rosenstein and elevating Associate Attorney General Rachel Brand to oversee Mueller's investigation."

Vs the Times

"Another option that Mr. Trump considered in discussions with his advisers was dismissing the deputy attorney general, Rod J. Rosenstein, and elevating the Justice Department’s No. 3 official, Rachel Brand, to oversee Mr. Mueller. Mr. Rosenstein has overseen the investigation since March, when Attorney General Jeff Sessions recused himself."

TimT · « **Reply #17243 on:** January 26, 2018, 11:15:30 AM »

Quote from: ChaimMoskowitz on January 26, 2018, 11:07:50 AM

Mueller is a life long R.

Which means zilch

ChaimMoskowitz · « **Reply #17244 on:** January 26, 2018, 11:15:55 AM »

From the beginning Trump has tried to impede/stop this investigation. The Mueller firing (attempt) was just another piece of the puzzle. Now when he is caught red handed he still denies it. Any unbiased person would look at this as he has something to hide.

ChaimMoskowitz · « **Reply #17245 on:** January 26, 2018, 11:17:36 AM »

Quote from: TimT on January 26, 2018, 11:15:30 AM

Which means zilch

Of course it doesn't.

I would expect no less from you. On the other hand you and the other Gullibles complain his investigation is stacked with D's. Can you say hypocrisy?

aygart · « **Reply #17246 on:** January 26, 2018, 11:21:37 AM »

Quote from: ChaimMoskowitz on January 26, 2018, 11:07:50 AM

Mueller is a life long R. NEXT!!!

Quote from: ChaimMoskowitz on January 26, 2018, 11:05:54 AM

That has nothing to do with what I responded to so I am just going to ignore it.

aygart · « **Reply #17247 on:** January 26, 2018, 11:22:23 AM »

Quote from: ChaimMoskowitz on January 26, 2018, 11:15:55 AM

From the beginning Trump has tried to impede/stop this investigation. The Mueller firing (attempt) was just another piece of the puzzle. Now when he is caught red handed he still denies it. Any unbiased person would look at this as he has something to hide.

There are 2 reasons that a politician would want to stop an investigation into them.

https://twitter.com/seanc1976/status/956917500507246593

Seems you are part of that group.

ChaimMoskowitz · « **Reply #17248 on:** January 26, 2018, 11:34:11 AM »

Quote from: ilherman on January 25, 2018, 11:58:56 PM

I am not the fake news cnn. So I will need facts. Can you please show us where the white house denied such thing? Or where hannity denied it? All I know is that hannity had a real great show tonight..

You want facts? That's funny coming from someone that gets his facts from Hannity. Here it is from the mouth of the despicable individual himself.

August 10, 2017 -- Trump himself tells reporters in Bedminster, New Jersey, that he hasn't considered firing Mueller.

"I haven't given it any thought. I mean, I've been reading about it from you people. You say, oh, I'm going to dismiss him. No, I'm not dismissing anybody. I mean, I want them to get on with the task. But I also want the Senate and the House to come out with their findings. You know, judging from the people leaving the meetings -- leaks -- but they leave the meetings all the time, and they say, 'No, we haven't found any collusion.' There's no -- there is no collusion. You know why? Because I don't speak to Russians."

aygart · « **Reply #17249 on:** January 26, 2018, 11:39:15 AM »

https://www.wsj.com/articles/operation-sabotage-the-memo-1516925395

TimT · « **Reply #17250 on:** January 26, 2018, 11:40:55 AM »

Quote from: ChaimMoskowitz on January 26, 2018, 11:17:36 AM

Of course it doesn't.
I would expect no less from you. On the other hand you and the other Gullibles complain his investigation is stacked with D's. Can you say hypocrisy?

Why mention he’s an R ? Never-Trumpers are R’s, as you are well aware of.

ChaimMoskowitz · « **Reply #17251 on:** January 26, 2018, 11:43:06 AM »

Quote from: TimT on January 26, 2018, 11:40:55 AM

Why mention he’s an R ? Never-Trumpers are R’s, as you are well aware of.

Can you tell me with a straight face if he was a life long D that wouldn't be used against him?

aygart · « **Reply #17252 on:** January 26, 2018, 11:44:39 AM »

Quote from: ChaimMoskowitz on January 26, 2018, 11:43:06 AM

Can you tell me with a straight face if he was a life long D that wouldn't be used against him?

Of course it would, therefore?

ChaimMoskowitz · « **Reply #17253 on:** January 26, 2018, 11:48:43 AM »

Quote from: aygart on January 26, 2018, 11:44:39 AM

Of course it would, therefore?

If something would be used against him they why cant it be used to support him?

aygart · « **Reply #17254 on:** January 26, 2018, 11:49:32 AM »

Quote from: ChaimMoskowitz on January 26, 2018, 11:48:43 AM

If something would be used against him they why cant it be used to support him?

Because the lack of a specific strike against him isn't supportive.

ChaimMoskowitz · « **Reply #17255 on:** January 26, 2018, 11:51:36 AM »

Quote from: aygart on January 26, 2018, 11:49:32 AM

Because the lack of a specific strike against him isn't supportive.

No idea what you are trying to say.

aygart · « **Reply #17256 on:** January 26, 2018, 12:00:18 PM »

Quote from: ChaimMoskowitz on January 26, 2018, 11:51:36 AM

No idea what you are trying to say.

Not so complicated. Come out of you neat little CNN box for a minute.

Just because that specific thing is not a negative against him doesn't mean a positive. If he was a lifelong R and then became a nerever trumper then his being a lifelong R is irrelevant.

ChaimMoskowitz · « **Reply #17257 on:** January 26, 2018, 12:07:50 PM »

Quote from: aygart on January 26, 2018, 12:00:18 PM

Not so complicated. Come out of you neat little CNN box for a minute.

Just because that specific thing is not a negative against him doesn't mean a positive. If he was a lifelong R and then became a nerever trumper then his being a lifelong R is irrelevant.

Come out of your Hannity box and try to be objective. If you are going to use that someone is a D as a negative then it is fair for the other side to use that he is a R as a positive.

aygart · « **Reply #17258 on:** January 26, 2018, 12:12:10 PM »

Quote from: ChaimMoskowitz on January 26, 2018, 12:07:50 PM

Come out of your Hannity box and try to be objective. If you are going to use that someone is a D as a negative then it is fair for the other side to use that he is a R as a positive.

I have never in my life watched Hannity other than maybe if it was on while I was in a waiting room. I get zero info from him. (is that a positive?)

It is definitely better than being a Dem. One of the realities of Trump is that there are quite a number of Rs who are just as against him as Ds to the extent that they publicly voted for Hillary over Trump and still boast about it. Therefore until just that he is an R doesn't give enough information

aygart · « **Reply #17259 on:** January 26, 2018, 12:12:47 PM »

Topic Wiki

Poll

Who are you voting for?

Author Topic: US Politics/2016 Election Pick Your Poison Master Thread (Read 3864709 times)