Author Topic: US Politics/2016 Election Pick Your Poison Master Thread (Read 3864969 times)

ssvarc · « **Reply #20140 on:** May 06, 2018, 06:44:44 PM »

Quote from: ChaimMoskowitz on May 06, 2018, 06:40:52 PM

Is that a yes or a no, Huff?

I would have thought that such an easy question you'd be able to answer.

I guess I overestimated your abilities.

ChaimMoskowitz · « **Reply #20141 on:** May 06, 2018, 06:45:17 PM »

Quote from: ssvarc on May 06, 2018, 06:42:18 PM

Commonly understood, that is, by those who aren't intentionally obtuse.

Look, he watches movies.

@Freddie
...but

Quote from: ChaimMoskowitz on May 06, 2018, 05:47:32 PM

I buried you in the other thread and made you look foolish. Now you are bringing your nonsense here. What's next the NBA thread?

ssvarc · « **Reply #20142 on:** May 06, 2018, 06:54:15 PM »

Quote from: ChaimMoskowitz on May 06, 2018, 06:45:17 PM

Look, he watches movies. @Freddie
...but

Huff, that's the best you've got?

An 'ofen ganiv brent' response, a refusal to answer a simple yes or no question, and a preening estimation of your (rhetorical) abilities?

Never change, never change. I need the easy target.

ChaimMoskowitz · « **Reply #20143 on:** May 06, 2018, 06:56:30 PM »

Quote from: ssvarc on May 06, 2018, 06:54:15 PM

Huff, that's the best you've got?

An 'ofen ganiv brent' response, a refusal to answer a simple yes or no question, and a preening estimation of your (rhetorical) abilities?

Never change, never change. I need the easy target.

Quote from: ChaimMoskowitz on May 06, 2018, 05:47:32 PM

I buried you in the other thread and made you look foolish. Now you are bringing your nonsense here. What's next the NBA thread?

Here is the NBA thread so you can troll there also.

http://forums.dansdeals.com/index.php?topic=27560.0

ChaimMoskowitz · « **Reply #20144 on:** May 06, 2018, 07:25:52 PM »

He needs to get rid of this guy. He is worse than you know who with his stupid statements.
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/giuliani-trump-would-have-had-lawyer-pay-off-more-women-if-necessary/ar-AAwPVcB?ocid=ientp

aygart · « **Reply #20145 on:** May 06, 2018, 07:37:39 PM »

Quote from: ssvarc on May 06, 2018, 06:54:15 PM

Huff, that's the best you've got?

An 'ofen ganiv brent' response, a refusal to answer a simple yes or no question, and a preening estimation of your (rhetorical) abilities?

Never change, never change. I need the easy target.

Honestly, you are not giving an impression as being a very nice person.

aygart · « **Reply #20146 on:** May 06, 2018, 07:39:22 PM »

Quote from: ChaimMoskowitz on May 06, 2018, 07:25:52 PM

He needs to get rid of this guy. He is worse than you know who with his stupid statements.
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/giuliani-trump-would-have-had-lawyer-pay-off-more-women-if-necessary/ar-AAwPVcB?ocid=ientp

At this point the only explanation which would clear everyone is that Trump had a slush fund for paying off women administered by Cohen which he did not really keep track of. It was "just another cost of 'doing business'". That is actually quite plausible.

ChaimMoskowitz · « **Reply #20147 on:** May 06, 2018, 07:39:56 PM »

Quote from: aygart on May 06, 2018, 07:37:39 PM

Honestly, you are not giving an impression as being a very nice person.

Don't forget my simple question.

ChaimMoskowitz · « **Reply #20148 on:** May 06, 2018, 07:40:54 PM »

Quote from: aygart on May 06, 2018, 07:39:22 PM

At this point the only explanation which would clear everyone is that Trump had a slush fund for paying off women administered by Cohen which he did not really keep track of. It was "just another cost of 'doing business'". That is actually quite plausible.

They are to deep into the stories now.

aygart · « **Reply #20149 on:** May 06, 2018, 07:48:06 PM »

Quote from: ChaimMoskowitz on May 06, 2018, 06:14:56 PM

@aygart you post a lot of links from WSJ. Are they some fringe outlet or MSM?

I understand why you are saying that there are outlets which go both ways and you are right about that. When people discuss MSM in general in this context they are referring to the vast majority of media outlets which are biased anti-Trump. Are there exceptions? Yes. That doesn't make the generality false. Just look at the ratio. You have FOX and WSJ, maybe 1 or 2 more, on the Trump side depending on how broadly you define MSM. On the anti-Trump bias you have CBS NBC ABC CNN NYT WaPo LAT etc etc. That leaves the overall MSM bias as being anti.

aygart · « **Reply #20150 on:** May 06, 2018, 07:48:26 PM »

Quote from: ChaimMoskowitz on May 06, 2018, 07:40:54 PM

They are to deep into the stories now.

Since when did that stop them?

ChaimMoskowitz · « **Reply #20151 on:** May 06, 2018, 08:07:17 PM »

Quote from: aygart on May 06, 2018, 07:48:06 PM

I understand why you are saying that there are outlets which go both ways and you are right about that. When people discuss MSM in general in this context they are referring to the vast majority of media outlets which are biased anti-Trump. Are there exceptions? Yes. That doesn't make the generality false. Just look at the ratio. You have FOX and WSJ, maybe 1 or 2 more, on the Trump side depending on how broadly you define MSM. On the anti-Trump bias you have CBS NBC ABC CNN NYT WaPo LAT etc etc. That leaves the overall MSM bias as being anti.

Most news outlets lean liberal. That is like saying water is wet. To try and say (not you) many news outlets are not MSM because they don't lean liberal is ridicules.

aygart · « **Reply #20152 on:** May 06, 2018, 08:10:02 PM »

Quote from: ChaimMoskowitz on May 06, 2018, 08:07:17 PM

Most news outlets lean liberal. That is like saying water is wet. To try and say (not you) many news outlets are not MSM because they don't lean liberal is ridicules.

I can agree with that. I think most here when they use the term MSM are using it the way I described.

ChaimMoskowitz · « **Reply #20153 on:** May 06, 2018, 08:10:21 PM »

Quote from: aygart on May 06, 2018, 07:48:26 PM

Since when did that stop them?

I said a long time ago there is only so much people can take. You seem to think all this was built in when they voted for Trump. FOX and WSJ's latest positions shows there is a limit to this.

ChaimMoskowitz · « **Reply #20154 on:** May 06, 2018, 08:11:41 PM »

Quote from: aygart on May 06, 2018, 08:10:02 PM

I can agree with that. I think most here when they use the term MSM are using it the way I described.

Most are Trumpsters so we can both see why they would want to do it. That doesn't make it correct.

aygart · « **Reply #20155 on:** May 06, 2018, 08:12:24 PM »

Quote from: ChaimMoskowitz on May 06, 2018, 08:10:21 PM

I said a long time ago there is only so much people can take. You seem to think all this was built in when they voted for Trump. FOX and WSJ's latest positions shows there is a limit to this.

There are no blank checks (except to the Trump Women Slush Fund Inc). I do think that people are getting sick of it, but the existence of Stormy and most likely numerous others will not shock anyone.

aygart · « **Reply #20156 on:** May 06, 2018, 08:13:53 PM »

Quote from: ChaimMoskowitz on May 06, 2018, 08:11:41 PM

Most are Trumpsters so we can both see why they would want to do it. That doesn't make it correct.

I disagree with that. Most would write MSM and then if you ask them about Fox and WSJ they would answer that of course there are exception and they didn't mean them.

ChaimMoskowitz · « **Reply #20157 on:** May 06, 2018, 08:21:06 PM »

Quote from: aygart on May 06, 2018, 08:13:53 PM

I disagree with that. Most would write MSM and then if you ask them about Fox and WSJ they would answer that of course there are exception and they didn't mean them.

Just watch from here on out. Those that exclude right leaning MSM when saying MSM are Trumpsters. We both know why.

ChaimMoskowitz · « **Reply #20158 on:** May 06, 2018, 08:23:07 PM »

Quote from: aygart on May 06, 2018, 08:12:24 PM

There are no blank checks (except to the Trump Women Slush Fund Inc). I do think that people are getting sick of it, but the existence of Stormy and most likely numerous others will not shock anyone.

As I pointed out FOX and WSJ (both right leaning to put in gently) had enough of his lies. FOX called him out directly for the Stormy lies. More are going to turn on him. Remember Roy Moore?

aygart · « **Reply #20159 on:** May 06, 2018, 08:27:49 PM »

Quote from: ChaimMoskowitz on May 06, 2018, 08:21:06 PM

Just watch from here on out. Those that exclude right leaning MSM when saying MSM are Trumpsters. We both know why.

Stop being stupid

Topic Wiki

Poll

Who are you voting for?

Author Topic: US Politics/2016 Election Pick Your Poison Master Thread (Read 3864969 times)