US Politics/2016 Election Pick Your Poison Master Thread

[yuneeq]

Remember this is the guy who claimed at the beginning he never heard of Duke and wouldn't condemn him.

{{Citation needed}}

The same guy who said there are good Nazi's.

{{Citation needed}}

[aygart]

https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-curious-case-of-mr-downer-1527809075

......Which leads us back to what did inspire the FBI to act, and when? The Papadopoulos pretext is getting thinner.

[aygart]

{{Citation needed}}

{{Citation needed}}

comon

[ChaimMoskowitz]

comon

[yuneeq]

comon

No.
1. Trump condemned Duke 1000x. Stop with the nonsense.
2. Conservatives are consistently labeled either Nazis, far right, extreme right, etc. Most recent case - protesters for free speech in UK all labeled far right extremists. Fact is, there were also many regular normal conservatives at the rally, and no reason for Trump or any R' to fall for the media trap that everyone who isn't liberal is a Nazi.

3. Donald Trump actions as president have been more pro-Jew than any other president, and it's not even close. So don't be a fool and fall for the idiotic liberal bait that the greatest Jew loving President is a anti-semite. Actions speak far, far louder than misinterpreted words.

So, yes, citation needed.

[ChaimMoskowitz]

A prime example of this is when he called MS13 animals. I can think of no better way to describe them. That was not a racist comment even if it would have come straight from David Duke. Yet the liberal media and you both went touting it as such.

I touted this one as being racist?

The issue is you want to look at this as an isolated case. Couple this with calling those crossing the border murderers and rapist. Throw in banning all Muslims and I can go on.

[aygart]

I touted this one as being racist?

So then use his sh*thole comment or there are good people on both sides comment or humans are animals comment or any other 100 comments.

Speaking of his sh*thole comment, didn't you defend that one?

[ChaimMoskowitz]

Correct when you lump them all together as I just did above.

[ChaimMoskowitz]

No.
1. Trump condemned Duke 1000x. Stop with the nonsense.
2. Conservatives are consistently labeled either Nazis, far right, extreme right, etc. Most recent case - protesters for free speech in UK all labeled far right extremists. Fact is, there were also many regular normal conservatives at the rally, and no reason for Trump or any R' to fall for the media trap that everyone who isn't liberal is a Nazi.

3. Donald Trump actions as president have been more pro-Jew than any other president, and it's not even close. So don't be a fool and fall for the idiotic liberal bait that the greatest Jew loving President is a anti-semite. Actions speak far, far louder than misinterpreted words.

So, yes, citation needed.

Since you insist and have your head buried in the sand here is your anti-Semite president!!!

[aygart]

Correct when you lump them all together as I just did above.

That was not a racist comment even if it would have come straight from David Duke.t?

[ChaimMoskowitz]

Again in a vacuum I would agree but that is not how you judge someone.

[aygart]

Again in a vacuum I would agree but that is not how you judge someone.

So you feel David Duke is a vacuum?

[yesitsme]

Donald trump is a anti Semite and is loved the most by Semites "kmayim punim el punim".

[ChaimMoskowitz]

So you feel David Duke is a vacuum?

I guess I misunderstood. Anything from Duke is racist until proven otherwise.

[yuneeq]

Since you insist and have your head buried in the sand here is your anti-Semite president!!!

FAKE NEWS ALERT! (But expected nothing better from you)

[ChaimMoskowitz]

FAKE NEWS ALERT! (But expected nothing better from you)

Have you completely lost your mind? He refused to condemn DD or the KKK and claimed he never heard of them. Your childish behavior has to be the worst of anyone on the forum.

[yuneeq]

Remember this is the guy who claimed at the beginning he never heard of Duke and wouldn't condemn him.

"Duke ran for governor of Louisiana in 1991 as a Republican, and Trump said at the time that President George H.W. Bush was right “to come out against” Duke’s campaign. Duke lost but he won a majority of the white vote — which Trump found troubling. “I hate seeing what it represents,” Trump said, referring to what he called the “anger vote.”
In 2000, Trump considered running for the Reform Party presidential nomination but did not run because he said he did not want to be associated with Pat Buchanan, who had left the Republican Party to seek the Reform Party nomination, and David Duke, who supported Buchanan. Trump at the time called Duke “a bigot, a racist, a problem.”"

I guess you have alternative facts of what's considered "the beginning"?

[yuneeq]

Have you completely lost your mind? He refused to condemn DD or the KKK and claimed he never heard of them. Your childish behavior has to be the worst of anyone on the forum.

Liar, and ad hominem alert

Lies and insults, all you are able to resort to when confronted with the truth.

[ChaimMoskowitz]

I guess you have alternative facts of what's considered "the beginning"?

No you assumed what I meant by beginning instead of asking me and made a fool out of yourself.
So you are now pointing that besides being and anti-Semite he is a certified liar also? You can't make this stuff up. 

[hvaces42]

Since you insist and have your head buried in the sand here is your anti-Semite president!!!

Vladimir who? Wonder if his Commie parents had anything to do with his bias.