US Politics/2016 Election Pick Your Poison Master Thread

[ChaimMoskowitz]

Of course you are ignoring how I pointed out how you changed position and misrepresented what you wrote previously. I understand why you are doing that.

I provide the whole chain right here.

...and...
Everyone can see right through your BS and dishonesty. You will see the same post over and over until you answer.

Only because you decided that any discussion of the parts that you don't want discuss means that feel what fits your biases to have them saying. Your biases are preventing you from even knowing what people are really saying. That is how biased you are.

I know what they are saying. They are blaming the D's for this whole mess. They are saying K is afraid of a fair investigation because it will derail/kill his nomination. Am I missing anything?

You are missing more than you are getting. You need to own up to your biases so you can see past them.

What am I missing?

You will not get it until you own up to your biases. Everything he's been very explicit but your biases are pending you from seeing it.

What am I missing?

[zh cohen]

You could have just made that point to begin with instead of spinning what they said.
Have you ever been to HS/College parties? Have you ever thrown a kegger party?

No.

Should Judge Kavanagh be held responsible for the action of all high school/college kids, or should there be some sort of proof that he did something wrong before he is railroaded in the press and in the Senate?

[aygart]

I provide the whole chain right here.

...and...
Everyone can see right through your BS and dishonesty. You will see the same post over and over until you answer.

Somehow it ended early....

[ChaimMoskowitz]

No.

Should Judge Kavanagh be held responsible for the action of all high school/college kids, or should there be some sort of proof that he did something wrong before he is railroaded in the press and in the Senate?

If you read some of my post you would know the issue at this point is not what he did in HS/College. The issue is did he lie about them so he can be on the SCOTUS.

The only way we can possibly get any proof is by a fair independent investigation. That is not what was done today.

[ChaimMoskowitz]

Somehow it ended early....

It ended because you wouldn't answer the question because it would show your BS and dishonesty.

...and...
Everyone can see right through your BS and dishonesty. You will see the same post over and over until you answer.

Only because you decided that any discussion of the parts that you don't want discuss means that feel what fits your biases to have them saying. Your biases are preventing you from even knowing what people are really saying. That is how biased you are.

I know what they are saying. They are blaming the D's for this whole mess. They are saying K is afraid of a fair investigation because it will derail/kill his nomination. Am I missing anything?

You are missing more than you are getting. You need to own up to your biases so you can see past them.

What am I missing?

You will not get it until you own up to your biases. Everything he's been very explicit but your biases are pending you from seeing it.

What am I missing?

[avromie7]

It ended because you wouldn't answer the question because it would show your BS and dishonesty.

...and...
Everyone can see right through your BS and dishonesty. You will see the same post over and over until you answer.

So far the only one who's BS everyone sees thru is @ChaimMoskowitz

[Let3]

If you read some of my post you would know the issue at this point is not what he did in HS/College. The issue is did he lie about them so he can be on the SCOTUS.

The only way we can possibly get any proof is by a fair independent investigation. That is not what was done today.

1. The same way the fbi is being fair and impartial with their Russia/Trump investigation?

2. You agreed earlier that it is very hard to prove something didn’t happen.

[ChaimMoskowitz]

So far the only one who's BS everyone sees thru is @ChaimMoskowitz

Now you jump in with out backing anything up. You want to try and answer the question for him?

[chinagel]

So far the only one who's BS everyone sees thru is @ChaimMoskowitz

Assuming he isnt african american, it may just be a lack of intelligence.

[ChaimMoskowitz]

1. The same way the fbi is being fair and impartial with their Russia/Trump investigation?

2. You agreed earlier that it is very hard to prove something didn’t happen.

1 - OK is it fair to say you don't trust the FBI to conduct a fair investigation?
2 - That doesn't mean you don't try.

[aygart]

If you read some of my post you would know the issue at this point is not what he did in HS/College. The issue is did he lie about them so he can be on the SCOTUS.

The only way we can possibly get any proof is by a fair independent investigation. That is not what was done today.

Which is of course different that what you wrote originally as the reason for a "full investigation" as I pointed out previously and you continue to ignore. Those position shifts when being called out are the root of the issue I was referring to so really your question was answered even thought you don't like the answer and it makes sense that you should ignore it. Once you change positions and misrepresent what you previously wrote then it is clear that there was no honest position to start with. Once that is the case then who knows maybe you didn't miss anything and were just being dishonest.

[ChaimMoskowitz]

Assuming he isnt african american, it may just be a lack of intelligence.

Are you Jewish?

[ChaimMoskowitz]

Which is of course different that what you wrote originally as the reason for a "full investigation" as I pointed out previously and you continue to ignore. Those position shifts when being called out are the root of the issue I was referring to so really your question was answered even thought you don't like the answer and it makes sense that you should ignore it. Once you change positions and misrepresent what you previously wrote then it is clear that there was no honest position to start with. Once that is the case then who knows maybe you didn't miss anything and were just being dishonest.

Here is the full chain.

...and...

Everyone can see right through your BS and dishonesty. You will see the same post over and over until you answer.

Only because you decided that any discussion of the parts that you don't want discuss means that feel what fits your biases to have them saying. Your biases are preventing you from even knowing what people are really saying. That is how biased you are.

I know what they are saying. They are blaming the D's for this whole mess. They are saying K is afraid of a fair investigation because it will derail/kill his nomination. Am I missing anything?

You are missing more than you are getting. You need to own up to your biases so you can see past them.

What am I missing?

You will not get it until you own up to your biases. Everything he's been very explicit but your biases are pending you from seeing it.

What am I missing?

[aygart]

1 - OK is it fair to say you don't trust the FBI to conduct a fair investigation?
2 - That doesn't mean you don't try.

Such as all named attendees signing sworn affidavits that no such party ever happened?

[ChaimMoskowitz]

Such as all named attendees signing sworn affidavits that no such party ever happened?

Again false!!!


...and...
Everyone can see right through your BS and dishonesty. You will see the same post over and over until you answer.

Only because you decided that any discussion of the parts that you don't want discuss means that feel what fits your biases to have them saying. Your biases are preventing you from even knowing what people are really saying. That is how biased you are.

I know what they are saying. They are blaming the D's for this whole mess. They are saying K is afraid of a fair investigation because it will derail/kill his nomination. Am I missing anything?

You are missing more than you are getting. You need to own up to your biases so you can see past them.

What am I missing?

You will not get it until you own up to your biases. Everything he's been very explicit but your biases are pending you from seeing it.

What am I missing?

[chinagel]

Are you Jewish?

whats it to u?

[ChaimMoskowitz]

whats it to u?

Just trying to establish a pattern with certain post. You afraid to answer?

[aygart]

What are you missing? Any semblance of objectivity.

[chinagel]

Just trying to establish a pattern with certain post. You afraid to answer?

quaking in my boots actually. 

[ChaimMoskowitz]

What are you missing? Any semblance of objectivity.

You claimed over and over about my bias. How I was blinded by it and can't see the others sides position. Put up or...


Everyone can see right through your BS and dishonesty. You will see the same post over and over until you answer.

Only because you decided that any discussion of the parts that you don't want discuss means that feel what fits your biases to have them saying. Your biases are preventing you from even knowing what people are really saying. That is how biased you are.

I know what they are saying. They are blaming the D's for this whole mess. They are saying K is afraid of a fair investigation because it will derail/kill his nomination. Am I missing anything?

You are missing more than you are getting. You need to own up to your biases so you can see past them.

What am I missing?

You will not get it until you own up to your biases. Everything he's been very explicit but your biases are pending you from seeing it.

What am I missing?