US Politics/2016 Election Pick Your Poison Master Thread

[ChaimMoskowitz]

first of all jewishness isnt a nationality, if it were u wouldnt be able to convert. as far as ur original question, i dont feel it necessary to follow the wanderings of ur mind from topic to topic.

That's fine. You don't want to say and I understand.

[zh cohen]

Wait maybe I am missing something then. I fair investigation would not clear him or show it can't be verified?

Do you not see how the accusations themselves are being used as a weapon?

Do you really believe that Democrats would accept an FBI finding that there is no evidence for Ford's claims? If you do, I'd refer you to the FBI findings on Anita Hill, and the mainstream Democratic position on those allegations.

[ChaimMoskowitz]

K said he kept a diary. I wonder why he didn't produce that like he did the calendar.

[chinagel]

WOW, so my past practice shows the pattern of Trump?

Are any of the CLE players Jewish? 

Was Sonny Melton Jewish? 

want more?

[ChaimMoskowitz]

Do you not see how the accusations themselves are being used as a weapon?

Do you really believe that Democrats would accept an FBI finding that there is no evidence for Ford's claims? If you do, I'd refer you to the FBI findings on Anita Hill, and the mainstream Democratic position on those allegations.

I have checked my politics at the door on this one. I don't care about the R's and D's. I care about this nominee.

[ChaimMoskowitz]

want more?

You are a sick individual.

Was Sonny Melton Jewish? LAS memorial had Star of David with Hebrew writings.

[avromie7]

K said he kept a diary. I wonder why he didn't produce that like he did the calendar.

He kept a calendar/diary and he released it.

[avromie7]

You are a sick individual.

You don't get to call people names because they give you a taste of your own medicine.

[chinagel]

You are a sick individual.

Was Sonny Melton Jewish? LAS memorial had Star of David with Hebrew writings.

[aygart]

I will make you an offer. Just ignore me and I will do the same for you.

You can keep posting that stuff over again if you wish. My opinion has been very clear that anyone who follows politics will have biases on every single subject that it touches. By acknowledging those biases people can reach a party objective position but only if they understand that even that is likely to be affected somewhat by their biases. The less they acknowledge that the more their biases will affect their positions because they will be unable to see how someone with different biases may view it differently. That you don't even see how your original positions toed the dem line is a great illustration of that. My opinion is that my acknowledging my biases is actually a way to make my vote more objective. You twisted that into my saying that I am biased but everyone else is worse. I said no such thing and you know it. Don't expect to be twisting my words to meet your biases and for me to just ignore it. I may choose to but may not. I have been very clear about how you were biased and where those biases were expressed. I also showed complete with quotes how you changed positions. All that is happening now is that you are choosing to ignore it. That is your prerogative but doesn't change anything. If wish to leave this here we can do so but that doesn't obligate either of us to be quiet if we disagree about other things or even about this nomination.

[aygart]

He kept a calendar/diary and he released it.

Did he say the diary and calendar are the same thing?

[ChaimMoskowitz]

You don't get to call people names because they give you a taste of your own medicine.

When I say a prayer for someone and they try and use that against me I have every right to call that individual sick!!!

[avromie7]

Did he say the diary and calendar are the same thing?

Yes! Many times today.

[ChaimMoskowitz]

He kept a calendar/diary and he released it.

Care to link to it? Never heard of a diary and calendar being the same thing.

[ChaimMoskowitz]

You can keep posting that stuff over again if you wish. My opinion has been very clear that anyone who follows politics will have biases on every single subject that it touches. By acknowledging those biases people can reach a party objective position but only if they understand that even that is likely to be affected somewhat by their biases. The less they acknowledge that the more their biases will affect their positions because they will be unable to see how someone with different biases may view it differently. That you don't even see how your original positions toed the dem line is a great illustration of that. My opinion is that my acknowledging my biases is actually a way to make my vote more objective. You twisted that into my saying that I am biased but everyone else is worse. I said no such thing and you know it. Don't expect to be twisting my words to meet your biases and for me to just ignore it. I may choose to but may not. I have been very clear about how you were biased and where those biases were expressed. I also showed complete with quotes how you changed positions. All that is happening now is that you are choosing to ignore it. That is your prerogative but doesn't change anything. If wish to leave this here we can do so but that doesn't obligate either of us to be quiet if we disagree about other things or even about this nomination.

Now you go off on another tangent. Here is the full chain!!!

Everyone can see right through your BS and dishonesty. You will see the same post over and over until you answer.

Only because you decided that any discussion of the parts that you don't want discuss means that feel what fits your biases to have them saying. Your biases are preventing you from even knowing what people are really saying. That is how biased you are.

I know what they are saying. They are blaming the D's for this whole mess. They are saying K is afraid of a fair investigation because it will derail/kill his nomination. Am I missing anything?

You are missing more than you are getting. You need to own up to your biases so you can see past them.

What am I missing?

You will not get it until you own up to your biases. Everything he's been very explicit but your biases are pending you from seeing it.

What am I missing?

[aygart]

Now you go off on another tangent. Here is the full chain!!!

Everyone can see right through your BS and dishonesty. You will see the same post over and over until you answer.

Continuing with the outright lie that it is the full chain...

[aygart]

Yes! Many times today.

Can you give some quotes?

[ChaimMoskowitz]

Continuing with the outright lie that it is the full chain...

Then produce your version. Until I get my answer.


Everyone can see right through your BS and dishonesty. You will see the same post over and over until you answer.

Only because you decided that any discussion of the parts that you don't want discuss means that feel what fits your biases to have them saying. Your biases are preventing you from even knowing what people are really saying. That is how biased you are.

I know what they are saying. They are blaming the D's for this whole mess. They are saying K is afraid of a fair investigation because it will derail/kill his nomination. Am I missing anything?

You are missing more than you are getting. You need to own up to your biases so you can see past them.

What am I missing?

You will not get it until you own up to your biases. Everything he's been very explicit but your biases are pending you from seeing it.

What am I missing?

[ChaimMoskowitz]

Did he say the diary and calendar are the same thing?

Yes! Many times today.

You are 100% wrong with this ridicules statement as usual. They are not the same so STOP with this nonsense!!!

[avromie7]

Care to link to it? Never heard of a diary and calendar being the same thing.

Can you give some quotes?

He basically said it was a forward and backward looking calendar, and as an example he said there were some days where he crossed out a workout or Dr's appointment that he missed. As an example and proof of how it was backward looking was that he named specific people that were at a specific event.