US Politics/2016 Election Pick Your Poison Master Thread

[ChaimMoskowitz]

WOW I would like to be a fly on that wall.

[zh cohen]

You can't act like me but you can try. Your views were molded since birth. 

And yours were not?

[ChaimMoskowitz]

And yours were not?

You mean like inclusion and not exclusion?

[aygart]

lol

[shaulyaakov]

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/sep/28/house-votes-permanently-extend-individual-tax-cuts/

Probably DOA in the Senate.

[aygart]

Probably DOA in the Senate.

That depends on whether it can be done by reconciliation and the results of the midterms but at the end of the day unlikely to pass.

[ChaimMoskowitz]

Flake did some soul searching and wants a fair investigation.
I guess some here can slam Flake for a D talking point or realize what is fair!!!

[aygart]

Flake did some soul searching and wants a fair investigation.
I guess some here can slam Flake for a D talking point or realize what is fair!!!

I have been all for a short investigation from day one, something you refuse to acknowledge. This is not the Dem talking point nor what you were saying at the outset until you changed your tune upon being called out.
That is one of the items you have been missing.

[shaulyaakov]

That depends on whether it can be done by reconciliation and the results of the midterms but at the end of the day unlikely to pass.

I don't think it can be or they would have done it sooner. Why wait a year?

[ChaimMoskowitz]

I have been all for a short investigation from day one, something you refuse to acknowledge. This is not the Dem talking point nor what you were saying at the outset until you changed your tune upon being called out.
That is one of the items you have been missing.

WOW you just broke the BS meter!!!

Everyone can see right through your BS and dishonesty. You will see the same post over and over until you answer.

Only because you decided that any discussion of the parts that you don't want discuss means that feel what fits your biases to have them saying. Your biases are preventing you from even knowing what people are really saying. That is how biased you are.

I know what they are saying. They are blaming the D's for this whole mess. They are saying K is afraid of a fair investigation because it will derail/kill his nomination. Am I missing anything?

You are missing more than you are getting. You need to own up to your biases so you can see past them.

What am I missing?

You will not get it until you own up to your biases. Everything he's been very explicit but your biases are pending you from seeing it.

What am I missing?

[aygart]

I don't think it can be or they would have done it sooner. Why wait a year?

The year is what may allow it to use reconciliation.

[ChaimMoskowitz]

I don't think it can be or they would have done it sooner. Why wait a year?

Elections, they are desperate!!!

[aygart]

[aygart]

https://twitter.com/jeremy_gibbs/status/1045737785875881984

[ChaimMoskowitz]

Feels so good to be vindicated on a Friday!!! 

[ChaimMoskowitz]

When some want to lump all the senate and congress together they are proven wrong again. This is what happens when you try and project your faults on others!!!

[aygart]

WOW you just broke the BS meter!!!

Everyone can see right through your BS and dishonesty. You will see the same post over and over until you answer.

Ok you believe him and don't believe her. I believe both at this point and want a fair investigation to sort it out. I guess that makes me biased. 

I know you are avoiding this because you can't back it up. Please show where I called for a FULL BLOWN INVESTIGATION or just admit I never did. This was just your spin.

D's are calling for a full FBI investigation. This is what should happen first since K now says he was not at the party according to FOX.

Technically correct? This is a serious allegation and needs to be fully investigated.

I would be against any investigation that would delay this past the mid-terms.

vs.

I just pointed out how it was done for Hill. If it takes two weeks or more it still doesn't change anything unless you want this nominee on the court no matter what.

This is a real answer instead of the BS @aygart keeps posting. I agree with you 100%. I would be against any investigation that would delay this past the mid-terms.

So you are worried an investigation will delay the conformation and put it at risk. Glad you are being honest.

Note that the "real answer" and the "B_" that he has been calling political blah blah are the same thing. And he calls others biased and dishonest.

If the FBI would have been instructed to look into this the investigation could have already been over just like the Hill investigation.

If that is the case then go for it.

Kavanaugh, Judge, Smyth

I would want an investigation but also wouldn't want that to be required when it would very likely delay SCOTUS confirmation and put it at risk. When just the investigation being done the way the accuser wants alone means he lost that needs to be taken into account. Heads I win tails you lose is not due process.

But then again facts are not your thing.....

[ChaimMoskowitz]

When some want to lump all the senate and congress together they are proven wrong again. This is what happens when you try and project your faults on others!!!

Bump!!! 

[aygart]

When some want to lump all the senate and congress together they are proven wrong again. This is what happens when you try and project your faults on others!!!

I assume this is addressed towards me but have no clue what you are talking about.

[ChaimMoskowitz]

You all have a GS. I am done gloating!!!