US Politics/2016 Election Pick Your Poison Master Thread

[aygart]

https://twitter.com/MikeTokes/status/1045921390828826624

This seems to be missing that the IP address is quite often for entire networks or more.

[aygart]

How many times did K say beer, he likes beer or drinks beer? Why was he crying when talked about working out drinking beer? Who drinks beer working out?

How closely correlated is it to how many times he was asked about it?

[ChaimMoskowitz]

How closely correlated is it to how many times he was asked about it?

In his opening speech?
ROFLMAO and...

Everyone can see right through your BS and dishonesty. You will see the same post over and over until you answer.

Only because you decided that any discussion of the parts that you don't want discuss means that feel what fits your biases to have them saying. Your biases are preventing you from even knowing what people are really saying. That is how biased you are.

I know what they are saying. They are blaming the D's for this whole mess. They are saying K is afraid of a fair investigation because it will derail/kill his nomination. Am I missing anything?

You are missing more than you are getting. You need to own up to your biases so you can see past them.

What am I missing?

You will not get it until you own up to your biases. Everything he's been very explicit but your biases are pending you from seeing it.

What am I missing?

[aygart]

In his opening speech?
ROFLMAO and...

Everyone can see right through your BS and dishonesty. You will see the same post over and over until you answer.

Oh, you meant his opening speech only? That would be 12 with 8 of them concentrated in 2 consecutive paragraphs. One of the others was referring to Ford saying she had one prior to the alleged party.
1. Listen to the people that I’ve grown up with and worked with and played with and coached with and dated and taught and gone to games with and had beers with.2.She says confidently that she had one beer at the party.3.When I was in town, I spent much of my time working, working out, lifting weights, playing basketball or hanging out and having some beers with friends as we talked about life and football and school and girls4.The calendars show a few weekday gatherings at friends’ houses to meet up and have some beers and work out5-12. My friends and I sometimes got together and had parties on weekends. The drinking age was 18 in Maryland for most of my time in high school and was 18 in D.C. for all of my time in high school. I drank beer with my friends. Almost everyone did. Sometimes I had too many beers. Sometimes others did. I liked beer. I still like beer. But I did not drink beer to the point of blacking out and I never sexually assaulted anyone.[size=1.1875rem]There is a bright line between drinking beer, which I gladly do and which I fully embrace, and sexually assaulting someone, which is a violent crime. If every American who drinks beer or every American who drank beer in high school is suddenly presumed guilty of sexual assault, we’ll be an ugly new place in this country.


and..... (which of course includes the answer to your excuse as I had mentioned a few times already, but not expecting different)
[/size]

[size=1.1875rem]
Ok you believe him and don't believe her. I believe both at this point and want a fair investigation to sort it out. I guess that makes me biased. 

I know you are avoiding this because you can't back it up. Please show where I called for a FULL BLOWN INVESTIGATION or just admit I never did. This was just your spin.
[/size]

[size=1.1875rem][/size]

[size=1.1875rem]
D's are calling for a full FBI investigation. This is what should happen first since K now says he was not at the party according to FOX.
[/size]

[size=1.1875rem][/size]

[size=1.1875rem]
Technically correct? This is a serious allegation and needs to be fully investigated.
[/size]

[size=1.1875rem][/size]

[size=1.1875rem][/size]

[size=1.1875rem]
I would be against any investigation that would delay this past the mid-terms.
[/size]

[size=1.1875rem]
vs.
[/size]

[size=1.1875rem]
I just pointed out how it was done for Hill. If it takes two weeks or more it still doesn't change anything unless you want this nominee on the court no matter what.
[/size]

[size=1.1875rem][/size]

[size=1.1875rem][/size]

[size=1.1875rem][/size]

[size=1.1875rem]
This is a real answer instead of the BS @aygart keeps posting. I agree with you 100%. I would be against any investigation that would delay this past the mid-terms.
[/size]

[size=1.1875rem][/size]

[size=1.1875rem]
So you are worried an investigation will delay the conformation and put it at risk. Glad you are being honest.
[/size]

[size=1.1875rem]
Note that the "real answer" and the "B_" that he has been calling political blah blah are the same thing. And he calls others biased and dishonest.
[/size]

[size=1.1875rem][/size]

[ChaimMoskowitz]

That would be 12...

Only 12?
ROFLMAO and...

Everyone can see right through your BS and dishonesty. You will see the same post over and over until you answer.

Only because you decided that any discussion of the parts that you don't want discuss means that feel what fits your biases to have them saying. Your biases are preventing you from even knowing what people are really saying. That is how biased you are.

I know what they are saying. They are blaming the D's for this whole mess. They are saying K is afraid of a fair investigation because it will derail/kill his nomination. Am I missing anything?

You are missing more than you are getting. You need to own up to your biases so you can see past them.

What am I missing?

You will not get it until you own up to your biases. Everything he's been very explicit but your biases are pending you from seeing it.

What am I missing?

[aygart]

Only 12?
ROFLMAO and...

Everyone can see right through your BS and dishonesty. You will see the same post over and over until you answer.

Go check. I quoted them. Are there any I missed?

Ok you believe him and don't believe her. I believe both at this point and want a fair investigation to sort it out. I guess that makes me biased. 

I know you are avoiding this because you can't back it up. Please show where I called for a FULL BLOWN INVESTIGATION or just admit I never did. This was just your spin.

D's are calling for a full FBI investigation. This is what should happen first since K now says he was not at the party according to FOX.

Technically correct? This is a serious allegation and needs to be fully investigated.

I would be against any investigation that would delay this past the mid-terms.

vs.

I just pointed out how it was done for Hill. If it takes two weeks or more it still doesn't change anything unless you want this nominee on the court no matter what.

This is a real answer instead of the BS @aygart keeps posting. I agree with you 100%. I would be against any investigation that would delay this past the mid-terms.

So you are worried an investigation will delay the conformation and put it at risk. Glad you are being honest.

Note that the "real answer" and the "B_" that he has been calling political blah blah are the same thing. And he calls others biased and dishonest.

[ChaimMoskowitz]

Go check. I quoted them. Are there any I missed?

He talks about beer 12 times by your count when no one asks him and you don't see that as an issue. Glad you are not an employer but wait you are. 
If you want to prove a point then show a chronical order of what you are trying to prove. Jumping all over the place during different conversations just shows your BS and dishonesty.
So here it is for 100+ time!!!
Everyone can see right through your BS and dishonesty. You will see the same post over and over until you answer.

Only because you decided that any discussion of the parts that you don't want discuss means that feel what fits your biases to have them saying. Your biases are preventing you from even knowing what people are really saying. That is how biased you are.

I know what they are saying. They are blaming the D's for this whole mess. They are saying K is afraid of a fair investigation because it will derail/kill his nomination. Am I missing anything?

You are missing more than you are getting. You need to own up to your biases so you can see past them.

What am I missing?

You will not get it until you own up to your biases. Everything he's been very explicit but your biases are pending you from seeing it.

What am I missing?

[aygart]

He talks about beer 12 times by your count when no one asks him and you don't see that as an issue. Glad you are not an employer but wait you are. 
If you want to prove a point then show a chronical order of what you are trying to prove. Jumping all over the place during different conversations just shows your BS and dishonesty.
So here it is for 100+ time!!!
Everyone can see right through your BS and dishonesty. You will see the same post over and over until you answer.

Of course, why would he ba mentioning beer when it was a big part of the allegations he was testifying about. Why would that happen? Also, 8 of the 12 were in 2 consecutive short paragraphs. And then you go claiming you are not biased.....

I knew you wouldn't be satisfied. Just like your mentors-nothing will satisfy them either.

Timestamps are all there.

Ok you believe him and don't believe her. I believe both at this point and want a fair investigation to sort it out. I guess that makes me biased. 

I know you are avoiding this because you can't back it up. Please show where I called for a FULL BLOWN INVESTIGATION or just admit I never did. This was just your spin.

D's are calling for a full FBI investigation. This is what should happen first since K now says he was not at the party according to FOX.

Technically correct? This is a serious allegation and needs to be fully investigated.

I would be against any investigation that would delay this past the mid-terms.

vs.

I just pointed out how it was done for Hill. If it takes two weeks or more it still doesn't change anything unless you want this nominee on the court no matter what.

This is a real answer instead of the BS @aygart keeps posting. I agree with you 100%. I would be against any investigation that would delay this past the mid-terms.

So you are worried an investigation will delay the conformation and put it at risk. Glad you are being honest.

Note that the "real answer" and the "B_" that he has been calling political blah blah are the same thing. And he calls others biased and dishonest.

[ChaimMoskowitz]

Do you really want someone as on the SCOTUS who thinks this is revenge for HRC. Last time I check a Kool-Aid drinker is not a good choice for the SCOTUS.

[zh cohen]

If you go to a job interview and the questions they ask you are about sexual misconduct and drinking to much what do you think are your chances to get the job? 

When do we get to the "if the FBI investigated you for sexual assault, you can't be on the SCOTUS" stage of this farce?

[aygart]

Do you really want someone as on the SCOTUS who thinks this is revenge for HRC. Last time I check a Kool-Aid drinker is not a good choice for the SCOTUS.

Not sure why he thinks it is about HRC or even who else said that. It is about revenge for Garland as many Dems have said outright (some posted in this thread).

[aygart]

When do we get to the "if the FBI investigated you for sexual assault, you can't be on the SCOTUS" stage of this farce?

Seems with some we already did.

[zh cohen]

Do you really want someone as on the SCOTUS who thinks this is revenge for HRC. Last time I check a Kool-Aid drinker is not a good choice for the SCOTUS.

And all of the sudden you are out in the open with your defense of the Democrats...

[ChaimMoskowitz]

Of course, why would he ba mentioning beer when it was a big part of the allegations he was testifying about. Why would that happen? Also, 8 of the 12 were in 2 consecutive short paragraphs. And then you go claiming you are not biased.....

He is being accused of being drunk during the sexual assault. His defense is he drinks beer, he loves beer? You can't make this stuff up.
Your time stamps are all over the place unless you are talking about many different things. Now everyone can compare that with mine.

So hear we go again. Not sure why you are so afraid to just admit you are wrong.

Everyone can see right through your BS and dishonesty. You will see the same post over and over until you answer.

Only because you decided that any discussion of the parts that you don't want discuss means that feel what fits your biases to have them saying. Your biases are preventing you from even knowing what people are really saying. That is how biased you are.

I know what they are saying. They are blaming the D's for this whole mess. They are saying K is afraid of a fair investigation because it will derail/kill his nomination. Am I missing anything?

You are missing more than you are getting. You need to own up to your biases so you can see past them.

What am I missing?

You will not get it until you own up to your biases. Everything he's been very explicit but your biases are pending you from seeing it.

What am I missing?

[ChaimMoskowitz]

And all of the sudden you are out in the open with your defense of the Democrats...

The only thing is I support a conservative judge. That blows your BS out of the water. Also blows your BS and others out of the water that she is not credible. Even Trump and FOX claim she is credible.

[aygart]

He is being accused of being drunk during the sexual assault. His defense is he drinks beer, he loves beer? You can't make this stuff up.
Your time stamps are all over the place unless you are talking about many different things. Now everyone can compare that with mine.

So hear we go again. Not sure why you are so afraid to just admit you are wrong.

Everyone can see right through your BS and dishonesty. You will see the same post over and over until you answer.

There is a reason they are grouped into quotes of my posts. Each one is a change in your position after having been called out. It is not so complicated. No matter what I write you will not be satisfied. You are not ready to own up to your biases and are still stuck in your denial of them. Nothing I write will change your mind about it.

Listen, if it makes you happy to have me say I was wrong I can do that. It won't be the first time i said that even though I wasn't. I can do that for you too.

[ChaimMoskowitz]

When do we get to the "if the FBI investigated you for sexual assault, you can't be on the SCOTUS" stage of this farce?

Why are you afraid to answer the question I asked. Since you are so afraid to answer I will do it for you. ZERO to NONE!!!

[ChaimMoskowitz]

Listen, if it makes you happy...

What would make me happy is just stop responding to me and I will do the same. You keep trying to project your faults and insecurities onto others and I don't appreciate it. If you can't be honest there is no point to the discussion.

You keep claiming I am missing the others point of view. I post a couple things correctly about others point view and ask what am I missing. Instead of answering you try again to project your faults and insecurity onto me. Not going to work. They same BS you pulled before about me not ever agreeing with Trump. The sheep just as they are doing here jumped on the bandwagon. I shut them and you down with the BS just as I will do here!!!

Everyone can see right through your BS and dishonesty. You will see the same post over and over until you answer.

Only because you decided that any discussion of the parts that you don't want discuss means that feel what fits your biases to have them saying. Your biases are preventing you from even knowing what people are really saying. That is how biased you are.

I know what they are saying. They are blaming the D's for this whole mess. They are saying K is afraid of a fair investigation because it will derail/kill his nomination. Am I missing anything?

You are missing more than you are getting. You need to own up to your biases so you can see past them.

What am I missing?

You will not get it until you own up to your biases. Everything he's been very explicit but your biases are pending you from seeing it.

What am I missing?

[zh cohen]

Now the ABA who the republicans call the "gold standard" is calling for an FBI investigation. Also the Dersh who some here constantly praise is calling for an investigation. He stated the obvious: “possible that one of them is deliberately lying. Right now, there is no way of knowing for certain, which is why the FBI needs to talk to the judge’s accusers and others.”
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/american-bar-association-calls-for-fbi-investigation-into-kavanaugh-allegations-delay-in-confirmation-votes/ar-BBNEbmZ?ocid=spartanntp

Pretty sure this is#fakenews.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/american-bar-association-committee-still-stands-behind-kavanaugh

[zh cohen]

Why are you afraid to answer the question I asked. Since you are so afraid to answer I will do it for you. ZERO to NONE!!!

Not sure what question you are referring to.