Topic Wiki

Thread summary:

Trump walks in a room.

1. Moshe123 shoots at him because he is pure evil, 2. ilherman+hachover jump in front of the bullets because Trump is our savior. 3. aygart tackles Moshe123 because Trump is better than HRC, 4. but Baruch can't stand Trump so he tells aygart he's crazy and Trump is a madman. 5. ExGingi would like to point out that who cares what he is, all that matters is the supreme court nominations. 6. Dan and others aren't really sure how this makes them feel plus they don't really want to drink poison. 7. Spoiler alert: Moshe123's gun was empty, it was just a blank.

And Freddie is in the back of the room just cooking his cholent. Until he announces that there are TWO menu choices, Pareve Cholent or Vegetable Lasagna. While etech0 figured out that they are both poisoned.


Repeat x100.

And then Hilary walks into the room with the most confidence a candidate has had in recent history. She is so confident that she eats both the Pareve Cholent and Vegetable Lasagna. Everyone is the room is aghast, they don't know how this happened, could it be Comey is behind this poisoning or was it that her Obamacare premiums were to high to get her the help she needed.

Everyone stared as she choked and was cast into oblivion on November, 8, 2016 the last day she was heard from in the public eye.

Moshe123, ilherman, hachover, Baruch, ExGingi, Dan, Freddie, etech0, and the rest of America are in total shock and hope that so long as Trump doesn't eat any Pareve Cholent and Vegetable Lasagna and stays true to his supreme court nominees this may be the greatest thing to happen since the CSR and GC's.

But remember this may be the beginning of the end...

P.S. Thanks to cognitive dissonance aygart, Michael Moore, and Scott Adams knew the whole time that Trump could win, unfortunately for JTZ he may be off DDF for the next 4 years due to his mandatory 3 times daily consumption of CROW!

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sub notes:

Nov 8 : Time to edit the wiki. Biggest upset in American History according to Michael Isikoff.


http://forums.dansdeals.com/index.php?topic=57647.0

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_trump_vs_clinton-5491.html
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_trump_vs_clinton_vs_johnson_vs_stein-5952.html
https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump?lang=en
http://blog.dilbert.com/
http://fivethirtyeight.com/
All Political Ads - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCvuOH0oJFwElBgRKz-eMlLw

As things turns out, the most prescient view on this election was that of Michael Moore! Though Scott Adams is also claiming a high view level of prescience.


Poll

Who are you voting for?

Clinton
12 (10.3%)
Trump
67 (57.3%)
Johnson
2 (1.7%)
Other (Write in)
8 (6.8%)
I don't vote in general and won't be voting this year
9 (7.7%)
I do vote in general, but won't be this year
19 (16.2%)

Total Members Voted: 117

Author Topic: US Politics/2016 Election Pick Your Poison Master Thread  (Read 1349305 times)

Online CountValentine

  • Dansdeals Lifetime Presidential Platinum Elite
  • *********
  • Join Date: Mar 2013
  • Posts: 6028
  • Total likes: 719
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 0
  • Gender: Female
    • View Profile
  • Location: Poland - Exiled
  • Programs: DAOTYA, DDF Level 3, 5K Lounge
Re: US Politics/2016 Election Pick Your Poison Master Thread
« Reply #29460 on: January 21, 2020, 07:04:14 PM »
You can't take politics out of a process that is inherently political.
I just want to see a fair trial. Everyone here should want the same but for some reason they don't.
You're so far up Trump's a** you can see Giuliani's feet.  HT Baruch

Offline zh cohen

  • Dansdeals Platinum Elite + Lifetime Silver Elite
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2013
  • Posts: 583
  • Total likes: 143
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 1
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Location: Brooklyn
Re: US Politics/2016 Election Pick Your Poison Master Thread
« Reply #29461 on: January 21, 2020, 07:17:41 PM »

We are only
pass that stage

because Democrats in the house refused to do a proper and full investigation.

I just want to see a fair trial. Everyone here should want the same but for some reason they don't.

The only way to get a fair trial is for the House to withdraw the articles of impeachment until a full, fair investigation (with all the relevant witnesses) is completed.

Online CountValentine

  • Dansdeals Lifetime Presidential Platinum Elite
  • *********
  • Join Date: Mar 2013
  • Posts: 6028
  • Total likes: 719
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 0
  • Gender: Female
    • View Profile
  • Location: Poland - Exiled
  • Programs: DAOTYA, DDF Level 3, 5K Lounge
Re: US Politics/2016 Election Pick Your Poison Master Thread
« Reply #29462 on: January 21, 2020, 07:23:14 PM »
The only way to get a fair trial is for the House to withdraw the articles of impeachment until a full, fair investigation (with all the relevant witnesses) is completed.
The senate has complete control over having a fair trial. There was no trial in the house.
What is so hard to understand? Rhetorical question because you all know that already.
You're so far up Trump's a** you can see Giuliani's feet.  HT Baruch

Online aygart

  • Dansdeals Lifetime Presidential Platinum Elite
  • *********
  • Join Date: May 2008
  • Posts: 7935
  • Total likes: 2168
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 7
    • View Profile
    • Lower Watt Energy Brokers
  • Programs: www.lowerwatt.com
Re: US Politics/2016 Election Pick Your Poison Master Thread
« Reply #29463 on: January 21, 2020, 07:41:46 PM »
When the leader of the majority (who has all the power) say he will not be impartial, then takes an oath to be impartial, I have no trust in him to do the right thing. So to your original question it would be no for that reason.

Now a simple question for you. For a fair trial should there be witnesses from both sides?
It depends on the situation. I have seen fair trials with no witnesses. There is definitely no calling of surprise new witnesses done at the trial. All evidence needs to have been given to the defense beforehand. There is no new investigation of witnesses done at the trial. That is a violation of the due process of the defendant and not a fair trial. For a fair trial, the prosecution needs to hand over all evidence they have prior to the trial. This was not done. At a fair trial, the whistleblower would be required to testify and the prosecution withholding him would be grounds for dismissal.

Do you think that there should be new witnesses who were never admitted to evidence before? Do you think that new documentary evidence should be subpoenaed? Do you think the whistleblower should testify?
You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used to start a religious discussion.

Online aygart

  • Dansdeals Lifetime Presidential Platinum Elite
  • *********
  • Join Date: May 2008
  • Posts: 7935
  • Total likes: 2168
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 7
    • View Profile
    • Lower Watt Energy Brokers
  • Programs: www.lowerwatt.com
Re: US Politics/2016 Election Pick Your Poison Master Thread
« Reply #29464 on: January 21, 2020, 07:43:35 PM »
I just want to see a fair trial. Everyone here should want the same but for some reason they don't.
Lol
You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used to start a religious discussion.

Online CountValentine

  • Dansdeals Lifetime Presidential Platinum Elite
  • *********
  • Join Date: Mar 2013
  • Posts: 6028
  • Total likes: 719
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 0
  • Gender: Female
    • View Profile
  • Location: Poland - Exiled
  • Programs: DAOTYA, DDF Level 3, 5K Lounge
Re: US Politics/2016 Election Pick Your Poison Master Thread
« Reply #29465 on: January 21, 2020, 08:24:02 PM »
Lol
That's the difference between me and most here.
You're so far up Trump's a** you can see Giuliani's feet.  HT Baruch

Online CountValentine

  • Dansdeals Lifetime Presidential Platinum Elite
  • *********
  • Join Date: Mar 2013
  • Posts: 6028
  • Total likes: 719
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 0
  • Gender: Female
    • View Profile
  • Location: Poland - Exiled
  • Programs: DAOTYA, DDF Level 3, 5K Lounge
Re: US Politics/2016 Election Pick Your Poison Master Thread
« Reply #29466 on: January 21, 2020, 08:25:40 PM »
It depends on the situation. I have seen fair trials with no witnesses. There is definitely no calling of surprise new witnesses done at the trial. All evidence needs to have been given to the defense beforehand. There is no new investigation of witnesses done at the trial. That is a violation of the due process of the defendant and not a fair trial. For a fair trial, the prosecution needs to hand over all evidence they have prior to the trial. This was not done. At a fair trial, the whistleblower would be required to testify and the prosecution withholding him would be grounds for dismissal.
You seem to be confused. The prosecution gave a list of witnesses/documents. The defense/R's are saying no.
You're so far up Trump's a** you can see Giuliani's feet.  HT Baruch

Offline yossig

  • Dansdeals Platinum Elite + Lifetime Silver Elite
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2015
  • Posts: 514
  • Total likes: 29
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 5
    • View Profile
  • Location: brooklyn
Re: US Politics/2016 Election Pick Your Poison Master Thread
« Reply #29467 on: January 21, 2020, 08:37:56 PM »
Look you can't take politics out of this so what is the point? You will defend this guy against basic laws we live by. Not only you but so far everyone that responded. I would ask why is that but I already know.  ;)
you didnít answer the question

Online CountValentine

  • Dansdeals Lifetime Presidential Platinum Elite
  • *********
  • Join Date: Mar 2013
  • Posts: 6028
  • Total likes: 719
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 0
  • Gender: Female
    • View Profile
  • Location: Poland - Exiled
  • Programs: DAOTYA, DDF Level 3, 5K Lounge
Re: US Politics/2016 Election Pick Your Poison Master Thread
« Reply #29468 on: January 21, 2020, 08:39:25 PM »
you didnít answer the question
...and won't be when all get from him is non-answer answers like the following: It depends on the situation.  ::)
You're so far up Trump's a** you can see Giuliani's feet.  HT Baruch

Offline gingyguy

  • Dansdeals Lifetime Platinum Elite
  • *******
  • Join Date: Sep 2011
  • Posts: 1418
  • Total likes: 402
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 36
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Programs: I don't like to brag
Re: US Politics/2016 Election Pick Your Poison Master Thread
« Reply #29469 on: January 21, 2020, 08:59:22 PM »
I just want to see a fair trial. Everyone here should want the same but for some reason they don't.
It's wrong to want a fair trial. What you should want is a fair process. Which we are to far gone for that.
May you slide down the banister of happiness & get many splinters of success up your career.

Online CountValentine

  • Dansdeals Lifetime Presidential Platinum Elite
  • *********
  • Join Date: Mar 2013
  • Posts: 6028
  • Total likes: 719
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 0
  • Gender: Female
    • View Profile
  • Location: Poland - Exiled
  • Programs: DAOTYA, DDF Level 3, 5K Lounge
Re: US Politics/2016 Election Pick Your Poison Master Thread
« Reply #29470 on: January 21, 2020, 09:04:39 PM »
It's wrong to want a fair trial. What you should want is a fair process. Which we are to far gone for that.
We are at the trial stage. You believe the process up to this point hasn't been fair and that is fine but has nothing to do with a fair trial.
You're so far up Trump's a** you can see Giuliani's feet.  HT Baruch

Offline gingyguy

  • Dansdeals Lifetime Platinum Elite
  • *******
  • Join Date: Sep 2011
  • Posts: 1418
  • Total likes: 402
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 36
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Programs: I don't like to brag
Re: US Politics/2016 Election Pick Your Poison Master Thread
« Reply #29471 on: January 21, 2020, 09:07:18 PM »
We are at the trial stage. You believe the process up to this point hasn't been fair and that is fine but has nothing to do with a fair trial.
Its one process called impeachment, with two parts. Its not called fair if you have two separate standards for each part.
May you slide down the banister of happiness & get many splinters of success up your career.

Online CountValentine

  • Dansdeals Lifetime Presidential Platinum Elite
  • *********
  • Join Date: Mar 2013
  • Posts: 6028
  • Total likes: 719
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 0
  • Gender: Female
    • View Profile
  • Location: Poland - Exiled
  • Programs: DAOTYA, DDF Level 3, 5K Lounge
Re: US Politics/2016 Election Pick Your Poison Master Thread
« Reply #29472 on: January 21, 2020, 09:10:06 PM »
Its one process called impeachment, with two parts. Its not called fair if you have two separate standards for each part.
You keep saying the first part was not fair. There is disagreement across the country on that. Now there is a trial as there should be. If you want a fair trial you need witnesses. Those are the simple facts.
You're so far up Trump's a** you can see Giuliani's feet.  HT Baruch

Offline gingyguy

  • Dansdeals Lifetime Platinum Elite
  • *******
  • Join Date: Sep 2011
  • Posts: 1418
  • Total likes: 402
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 36
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Programs: I don't like to brag
Re: US Politics/2016 Election Pick Your Poison Master Thread
« Reply #29473 on: January 21, 2020, 09:12:04 PM »
You keep saying the first part was not fair. There is disagreement across the country on that. Now there is a trail as there should be. If you want a fair trial you need witnesses. Those are the simple facts.
I dont believe anyone thinks its was  fair. The proof is in the partisanship, that everyone is on their  own corner
May you slide down the banister of happiness & get many splinters of success up your career.

Offline gingyguy

  • Dansdeals Lifetime Platinum Elite
  • *******
  • Join Date: Sep 2011
  • Posts: 1418
  • Total likes: 402
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 36
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Programs: I don't like to brag
Re: US Politics/2016 Election Pick Your Poison Master Thread
« Reply #29474 on: January 21, 2020, 09:13:25 PM »
You keep saying the first part was not fair. There is disagreement across the country on that. Now there is a trial as there should be. If you want a fair trial you need witnesses. Those are the simple facts.
Do you think the first part was fair? 
May you slide down the banister of happiness & get many splinters of success up your career.