US Politics/2016 Election Pick Your Poison Master Thread

[cholent]

Wow.
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/442113/powerful-statement-election-unlikely-source

Can't watch video at work, can you summarize?

[yuneeq]

Can't watch video at work, can you summarize?

1. He couldn't get himself to vote for Hillary or Trump, instead just wrote in Kasich for his conscience
2. He is hopeful after seeing the Obama meeting that there's a difference between President Trump and campaign Trump
3. He is a religious christian and despite his disappointment he will pray for the success of Trump to fix the country's probelms

[yuneeq]

Wow.
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/442113/powerful-statement-election-unlikely-source

I take your wow and raise you

[Dan]

On this Veterans Day, remember that to thank the veterans for DJT

[zale]

Wow. I actually feel bad for her. Her husband shamed and ruined her over and over again, the Dems hate her, and now she is out of a job. (Clinton Foundation maybe?)

[cholent]

1. He couldn't get himself to vote for Hillary or Trump, instead just wrote in Kasich for his conscience
2. He is hopeful after seeing the Obama meeting that there's a difference between President Trump and campaign Trump
3. He is a religious christian and despite his disappointment he will pray for the success of Trump to fix the country's probelms

Thanks

[JTZ]

Looks like a short skirt but I can't tell about the neckline as she is wearing a coat.

[good sam]

David Brooks, who predicted that Trump's candidacy was not serious and he would drop out before Iowa, that Trump would underperform in Iowa and slip into oblivion, that Trump would never win the primaries, that Trump would never be able to energize the base, that Trump would never win in a general election, now predicts that Trump will be impeached or resign in the first year.

David Brooks back in January: "My predictions have been wrong consistently" but that won't stop him from trying.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/01/30/david_brooks_my_predictions_have_been_wrong_consistently_however_trump_will_underperform_in_iowa.html

It's time for David Brooks to shut up.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/12/opinion/the-view-from-trump-tower.html

[Toasted]

Wow. I actually feel bad for her. Her husband shamed and ruined her over and over again, the Dems hate her, and now she is out of a job. (Clinton Foundation maybe?)

Did you feel bad for Madoff too? I think there's plenty of influence she can still peddle to keep affording sbux latte's.

[JTZ]

@JTZ
I found solid proof that Trump endorses David Duke

So he lied when he said he did not know who David Duke was? Please show me where I said he never disavowed DD?

[zale]

Did you feel bad for Madoff too? I think there's plenty of influence she can still peddle to keep affording sbux latte's.

Eh, not quite the same thing. If Huma cries while she is being led away by the FBI, I wouldn't feel bad.

[Dawie]

Wow. I actually feel bad for her. Her husband shamed and ruined her over and over again, the Dems hate her, and now she is out of a job. (Clinton Foundation maybe?)

will there be a clinton foundation in 2017?

[yuneeq]

So he lied when he said he did not know who David Duke was? Please show me where I said he never disavowed DD?

You're still desperately clinging to the leftist rhetoric.
Do you know the difference between "knowing of someone" and "knowing someone"?

I'll give you 2 tries.

[JTZ]

You're still desperately clinging to the leftist rhetoric.
Do you know the difference between "knowing of someone" and "knowing someone"?

I'll give you 2 tries.

You are swallowing the rhetoric hook line and sinker. Here is what he said four times.
"Well, just so you understand, I don’t know anything about David Duke. OK?

The video you posted shows he knows all about DD for many years.

[good sam]

You're still desperately clinging to the leftist rhetoric.
Do you know the difference between "knowing of someone" and "knowing someone"?

I'll give you 2 tries.

-1
Knowning "about" someone. He never said he doesn't know who he is. JTZ knows that, and now I know his arguments are insincere.

[yuneeq]

You are swallowing the rhetoric hook line and sinker. Here is what he said four times.
"Well, just so you understand, I don’t know anything about David Duke. OK?

The video you posted shows he knows all about DD for many years.

Look how fast you change your argument when faced with the facts.

[good sam]

You are swallowing the rhetoric hook line and sinker. Here is what he said four times.
"Well, just so you understand, I don’t know anything about David Duke. OK?

The video you posted shows he knows all about DD for many years.

It's a figure of speech.

[JTZ]

Did I remember his exact quote, no. You are all playing word games. I think you went to the Bill Clinton school of what is "is".
He lied and your video proves it. That is the fact.

[yuneeq]

Did I remember his exact quote, no. You are all playing word games. I think you went to the Bill Clinton school of what is "is".
He lied and your video proves it. That is the fact.

I promise I was waiting for you to bring up Bill Clinton.

You are hilariously predictable and a terrible debater.
Just give up with your word game arguments that border on trolling.

[good sam]

JTZ probably also thinks "locker room banter" only takes place in locker rooms.