Author Topic: US Politics/2016 Election Pick Your Poison Master Thread (Read 4443696 times)

skyguy918 · « **Reply #9520 on:** January 04, 2017, 06:15:03 PM »

Quote from: CS1 on January 03, 2017, 09:04:54 PM

On another note, the Kushners bought a house in DC. Eight-minute walk to the local Chabad: http://bit.ly/TrumpKushnerHouseInDC

Article has wrong info. It's <25 minute walk to Kesher, not 40. All the politicians they list as having attended the Chabad shul were primarily members of Kesher. Expect the same here.

JTZ · « **Reply #9521 on:** January 05, 2017, 01:35:28 AM »

Over and over it is said I never give Trump credit for anything. Again for the xx time I will prove you wrong. Watch the price of gold.

Yammer · « **Reply #9522 on:** January 05, 2017, 02:26:27 AM »

Quote from: JTZ on January 05, 2017, 01:35:28 AM

Over and over it is said I never give Trump credit for anything. Again for the xx time I will prove you wrong. Watch the price of gold.

So your expecting an economic downturn?

JTZ · « **Reply #9523 on:** January 05, 2017, 02:41:43 AM »

Quote from: Yammer on January 05, 2017, 02:26:27 AM

So your expecting an economic downturn?

Do I have to say now?

Yammer · « **Reply #9524 on:** January 05, 2017, 02:45:20 AM »

Quote from: JTZ on January 05, 2017, 02:41:43 AM

Do I have to say now?

You'll find out in the morning when the boys are back

JTZ · « **Reply #9525 on:** January 05, 2017, 02:47:46 AM »

Quote from: Yammer on January 05, 2017, 02:45:20 AM

You'll find out in the morning when the boys are back

They give the standard head buried in the sand line. You are listening to the MSM.

aygart · « **Reply #9526 on:** January 05, 2017, 08:09:38 AM »

Quote from: JTZ on January 04, 2017, 09:46:47 AM

What are you talking about? Just yesterday I pointed out how he stopped the ethics train wreck the R's were headed for. He gets credit for that. Fords recent decision on not going ahead to build a plant in Mexico seems he gets credit for that to. This does not change who he is. His actions will do that and they have not changed.

The facts are that numerous times you have brought his vulgar statements into discussions where they were irrelevant. In those cases you were studying that he was wrong about something and others were disagreeing. You then brought in his vulgar statements to supposedly prove your point asking how they are defending him. That is called using them to avoid thought. Can you give us one example of an action of his since election day to which his vulgar statements are relevant?

aygart · « **Reply #9527 on:** January 05, 2017, 08:12:41 AM »

Quote from: JTZ on January 04, 2017, 04:05:31 PM

You can believe that but facts say differently. The taxpayers are footing the bills but how much is human life worth?

which facts say differently? The cherry picked ones presented by dems? The Rs can show you cherry picked numbers the other way.

aygart · « **Reply #9528 on:** January 05, 2017, 08:16:36 AM »

Quote from: JTZ on January 04, 2017, 04:36:54 PM

What if he has to make a decision on going to war? I guess he is going to make that decision with no input from the intelligence agencies that he constantly berates. Wait now I get it. He can use the Russians that he praises or the sexual predator Julian Assange.

"The "Intelligence" briefing on so-called "Russian hacking" was delayed until Friday, perhaps more time needed to build a case. Very strange!"

"Julian Assange said "a 14 year old could have hacked Podesta" - why was DNC so careless? Also said Russians did not give him the info!"

The facts are that no facts were presented to the public toi back up the claim that the Russians were behind the leaked emails. The information released makes a tenuous connection yi a Russian hack which has been shown to be shaky and still has not been shown to have any connection to the leaked emails. When it them gets presented as part of a political scheme it losses credibility.

aygart · « **Reply #9529 on:** January 05, 2017, 08:32:34 AM »

Quote from: JTZ on January 04, 2017, 04:36:54 PM

What if he has to make a decision on going to war? I guess he is going to make that decision with no input from the intelligence agencies that he constantly berates. Wait now I get it. He can use the Russians that he praises or the sexual predator Julian Assange.

"The "Intelligence" briefing on so-called "Russian hacking" was delayed until Friday, perhaps more time needed to build a case. Very strange!"

"Julian Assange said "a 14 year old could have hacked Podesta" - why was DNC so careless? Also said Russians did not give him the info!"

Yehuda57 · « **Reply #9530 on:** January 05, 2017, 08:44:31 AM »

https://twitter.com/pwnallthethings/status/816621553643294720

This is just something I saw yesterday

aro123 · « **Reply #9531 on:** January 05, 2017, 09:08:14 AM »

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/acts-of-faith/wp/2017/01/05/ivanka-trump-and-jared-kushners-choice-of-neighborhood-narrows-the-focus-on-chabad/?utm_term=.9da31fd1148b

JTZ · « **Reply #9532 on:** January 05, 2017, 09:34:07 AM »

Quote from: aygart on January 05, 2017, 08:32:34 AM

Now who has their head buried in the sand.

"The "Intelligence" briefing on so-called "Russian hacking" was delayed until Friday, perhaps more time needed to build a case. Very strange!"

"Julian Assange said "a 14 year old could have hacked Podesta" - why was DNC so careless? Also said Russians did not give him the info!"

aygart · « **Reply #9533 on:** January 05, 2017, 09:37:37 AM »

Quote from: JTZ on January 05, 2017, 09:34:07 AM

Now who has their head buried in the sand.

"The "Intelligence" briefing on so-called "Russian hacking" was delayed until Friday, perhaps more time needed to build a case. Very strange!"

"Julian Assange said "a 14 year old could have hacked Podesta" - why was DNC so careless? Also said Russians did not give him the info!"

My quoting a tweet does not mean I think it is true. Of course those are political just like the others were.

aygart · « **Reply #9534 on:** January 05, 2017, 09:41:24 AM »

Quote from: JTZ on January 05, 2017, 09:39:59 AM

You are not the president elect.

See my correction

JTZ · « **Reply #9535 on:** January 05, 2017, 09:42:41 AM »

Quote from: aygart on January 05, 2017, 09:41:24 AM

See my correction

See my delete. Wait that makes no sense.

ExGingi · « **Reply #9536 on:** January 05, 2017, 09:47:08 AM »

Quote from: JTZ on January 04, 2017, 04:05:31 PM

You can believe that but facts say differently. The taxpayers are footing the bills but how much is human life worth?

Health or Healthcare ≠ Health Insurance Coverage.

Human life is priceless. The ACA (which should be named UCA) did ostensibly give 20 million previously uninsured people, insurance coverage. I am not sure it made a real difference in people's health or access to care.

Maybe it does make a fundamental difference in health insurance coverage (though more than anything else it seems to be a shifting of wealth), but it did absolutely NOTHING to address out of control health care costs, or the underlying reasons to the spiraling cost increases.

JTZ · « **Reply #9537 on:** January 05, 2017, 09:51:16 AM »

Quote from: ExGingi on January 05, 2017, 09:47:08 AM

Maybe it does make a fundamental difference in health insurance coverage (though more than anything else it seems to be a shifting of wealth), but it did absolutely NOTHING to address out of control health care costs, or the underlying reasons to the spiraling cost increases.

I agree but that is a hard one (bolded) to determine.

aygart · « **Reply #9538 on:** January 05, 2017, 10:27:56 AM »

Quote from: JTZ on January 05, 2017, 09:51:16 AM

I agree but that is a hard one (bolded) to determine.

If you agree then why are you considering that to be a positive accomplishment of his?

JTZ · « **Reply #9539 on:** January 05, 2017, 10:39:13 AM »

Quote from: aygart on January 05, 2017, 10:27:56 AM

If you agree then why are you considering that to be a positive accomplishment of his?

Because the millions that now have health care outweigh the negatives. You don't look at these things in a vacuum.

Topic Wiki

Poll

Who are you voting for?

Author Topic: US Politics/2016 Election Pick Your Poison Master Thread (Read 4443696 times)