US Politics/2016 Election Pick Your Poison Master Thread

[aygart]

We found the collusion

The top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee reportedly held an eight-minute phone conversation last year with Russian radio hosts posing as a Ukrainian politician who promised to provide compromising images of President Trump.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/02/06/schiff-apparently-pranked-by-russian-radio-hosts-who-promised-naked-trump-photos.html

[ilherman]

As in they make the rules. Did you forget already about the SCOTUS?

And then when we're going to change the senate rules you are going to scream your head off.

[ilherman]

Total control? As in 60 votes in the senate?

Don't ask questions. He just repeats CNN.  He is not in a position to answer any questions.

[ChaimMoskowitz]

And then when we're going to change the senate rules you are going to scream your head off.

Don't ask questions. He just repeats CNN.  He is not in a position to answer any questions.

They already changed the rules for SCOTUS. You need to stop drinking.

WM has paper towels on sale. Get some to wipe that egg off your face!!! 

[shapsam]

They already changed the rules for SCOTUS. You need to stop drinking.

WM has paper towels on sale. Get some to wipe that egg off your face!!! 

They would have to change it again for this.

[shapsam]

We found the collusion

The top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee reportedly held an eight-minute phone conversation last year with Russian radio hosts posing as a Ukrainian politician who promised to provide compromising images of President Trump.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/02/06/schiff-apparently-pranked-by-russian-radio-hosts-who-promised-naked-trump-photos.html

And then had his top staffer follow up on it the next day, per the Daily Mail.

[ChaimMoskowitz]

They would have to change it again for this.

...and they have the votes to do it. That is why they are in total control.

[shapsam]

...and they have the votes to do it. That is why they are in total control.

And then when we're going to change the senate rules you are going to scream your head off.

[ChaimMoskowitz]

Don't buy his Hannity responses. No matter what I say they have total control.

[ilherman]

Don't buy his Hannity responses. No matter what I say they have total control.

It's scary how CNN turned you into a real gullible.

One non sense comment after the other, and when shapsam is trying to open your eyes he becomes a Hannity.

[ChaimMoskowitz]

It's scary how CNN turned you into a real gullible.

One non sense comment after the other, and when shapsam is trying to open your eyes he becomes a Hannity.

You have no response. Make sure you get Bounty to get that egg of your face.

[aygart]

Bullies don't win when you punch them right in the face!!!

Hmmmmmm

Ever since you changed to that"unity candle" you've been much more divisive.

[gingyguy]

They already changed the rules for SCOTUS. You need to stop drinking.

WM has paper towels on sale. Get some to wipe that egg off your face!!! 

link?

[ChaimMoskowitz]

link?

LOL

[gingyguy]

LOL

hey no fair i was trying to set you up to call me a gullible

[ChaimMoskowitz]

hey no fair i was trying to set you up to call me a gullible

I save that for my favorites.

[aygart]

[ChaimMoskowitz]

The president talks a weak game. Now he is scared to death to sit down and talk to Mueller. I wonder why.

[aygart]

https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2018-02-06%20CEG%20LG%20to%20DOJ%20FBI%20(Unclassified%20Steele%20Referral).pdf

[aygart]

Soooo contrary to the claims made by some they did not only use the verified info but relied on Steele's own "credibility" as per the testimony by The Great and Infallible Comey.

On the other hand, they do not have a right to rely on a source's source so easily.

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/456093/jerrold-nadler-memo-rebuttal-weak-unpersuasive
Here’s the problem: Steele is not the source of the information. For purposes of the warrant application, he is the purveyor of information from other sources. The actual sources of the information are Steele’s informants — anonymous Russians providing accounts based on hearsay three- and four-times removed from people said to have observed the events alleged. An example makes the point. Say I’m a prosecutor in a narcotics investigation. My DEA case agent is simply the best — many times rewarded by his agency and the Justice Department for his competence, diligence, and expert knowledge of how international drug cartels work. The agent brings me information that three of his sources have told him X is using a shipping container to import cocaine. I thus want to get a search warrant for the shipping container. When the court asks me what my probable cause is, I don’t get to say, “Gee, Judge, I have this fabulous investigative agent who’s got more performance awards than Tom Brady has touchdown passes. He tells me his informants are certain about the container.” If I try that, the judge — assuming he remains calm and doesn’t throw the warrant application in my face — either sends me back to law school or patiently explains that the issue is not the credibility of my investigative agent; it’s the credibility of my investigative agent’s informants.