Author Topic: US Politics/2016 Election Pick Your Poison Master Thread (Read 3828565 times)

aygart · « **Reply #18100 on:** February 08, 2018, 10:47:58 AM »

Quote from: ilherman on February 08, 2018, 08:21:41 AM

So fake news CNN is in full blown tantrum mode after an employee in the west wing allegedly abused his wife. Such an important issue to be discussed on national television. And they are not just discussing it. Every anchor is starting with this "breaking news". Oh, it makes Trump look bad. Now, this makes it a worthwhile topic.

http://www.cnn.com/2018/02/07/politics/rob-porter-white-house-who-knew/index.html

Porter's ex-wives detailed the allegations to the FBI over the course of a routine background check, they told CNN's MJ Lee on Wednesday. A year into the administration, Porter does not hold a security clearance.
By early fall, it was widely known among Trump's top aides -- including chief of staff John Kelly -- both that Porter was facing troubles in obtaining the clearance and that his ex-wives claimed he had abused them. No action was taken to remove him from the staff.
----------------
That IS a big deal.

Here is a blog by one ex
http://www.bornebackceaselessly.com/journal/2017/4/24/why-i-stayed
----------------

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/02/07/john-kelly-porter-allegations-abuse-398168
Can't make up his mind?

henche · « **Reply #18101 on:** February 08, 2018, 10:49:02 AM »

Love how Dems who call regular police pigs and applaud when they are killed in the line of duty, are suddenly loving them the FBI.

Finally we find out it's because the FBI is a wing of the democratic party, while the regular police enforce the law.

ChaimMoskowitz · « **Reply #18102 on:** February 08, 2018, 10:52:53 AM »

Quote from: henche on February 08, 2018, 10:49:02 AM

Love how Dems who call regular police pigs and applaud when they are killed in the line of duty, are suddenly loving them the FBI.

Link?

henche · « **Reply #18103 on:** February 08, 2018, 11:02:44 AM »

Quote from: ChaimMoskowitz on February 08, 2018, 10:52:53 AM

Link?

twitter.com
facebook.com
google.com

henche · « **Reply #18104 on:** February 08, 2018, 11:04:59 AM »

To help your "resist"ance, I've linked what the resistors are spending their money on.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/26899/report-heres-what-big-anti-trump-pac-actually-did-james-barrett

ChaimMoskowitz · « **Reply #18105 on:** February 08, 2018, 11:05:32 AM »

Quote from: henche on February 08, 2018, 11:02:44 AM

twitter.com
facebook.com
google.com

Cant find it. Link or #fakenews again!!!

henche · « **Reply #18106 on:** February 08, 2018, 11:08:04 AM »

Do Dems like them a military parade? You tell me. https://www.dailywire.com/news/26893/watch-chuck-schumer-called-military-parade-2014-michael-j-knowles

ChaimMoskowitz · « **Reply #18107 on:** February 08, 2018, 11:08:23 AM »

Can someone go to Toys-R-Us and get Trump some toy soldiers? This way we don't need to waste money on a parade. I guess rocket man is getting to him or did he get the idea from Putin?

shapsam · « **Reply #18108 on:** February 08, 2018, 11:08:57 AM »

Quote from: ChaimMoskowitz on February 08, 2018, 09:31:57 AM

My lawyers wont let me.

Would you speak to the Feds even if you did nothing wrong?

shapsam · « **Reply #18109 on:** February 08, 2018, 11:10:19 AM »

Quote from: ChaimMoskowitz on February 08, 2018, 11:08:23 AM

I guess rocket man is getting to him or did he get the idea from Putin?

How about Macron from France?

ChaimMoskowitz · « **Reply #18110 on:** February 08, 2018, 11:10:41 AM »

Quote from: shapsam on February 08, 2018, 11:08:57 AM

Would you speak to the feds even if you did nothing wrong?

H*ll no and I would say so. Only an idiot or a liar would say they wanted to sit down with the SC. So which one is he?

ChaimMoskowitz · « **Reply #18111 on:** February 08, 2018, 11:12:42 AM »

Quote from: shapsam on February 08, 2018, 11:10:19 AM

How about Macron from France?

That's where he got the idea?

aygart · « **Reply #18112 on:** February 08, 2018, 11:14:06 AM »

This is Slate guys!

But what was the reaction from the WH (and his puppies the opinion checkers) if someone actually said that at the time?

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/02/what-if-the-iran-deal-was-a-mistake.html

Any consideration of Obama’s priorities in the Middle East has to address the most contested part of his legacy, the still unfolding crisis in Syria. Many critics, including former members of his administration, have charged that Obama’s reluctance to intervene to a greater extent in Syria was motivated in part by the desire to achieve the nuclear agreement with Bashar al-Assad’s patron, Iran. In the new documentary, The Final Year, which follows Obama’s foreign policy team throughout 2016, adviser Ben Rhodes essentially legitimizes this claim by defending Obama’s hands-off policy in part by saying that if the U.S. had intervened more forcefully in Syria, it would have dominated Obama’s second term and the JCPOA would have been impossible to achieve.
--------------------

shapsam · « **Reply #18113 on:** February 08, 2018, 11:14:35 AM »

Quote from: ChaimMoskowitz on February 08, 2018, 11:10:41 AM

H*ll no and I would say so. Only an idiot or a liar would say they wanted to sit down with the SC. So which one is he?

He would want to but only a idiot or a liar would say they wanted to sit down with the SC against their lawyers advise

shapsam · « **Reply #18114 on:** February 08, 2018, 11:15:26 AM »

Quote from: ChaimMoskowitz on February 08, 2018, 11:12:42 AM

That's where he got the idea?

Reportedly...

ChaimMoskowitz · « **Reply #18115 on:** February 08, 2018, 11:16:36 AM »

Quote from: shapsam on February 08, 2018, 11:14:35 AM

He would want to but only a idiot or a liar would say they wanted to sit down with the SC against their lawyers advise

He said a long time ago "100%" he will talk to Mueller without and qualifications. So was he an idiot or a liar when he said that?

henche · « **Reply #18116 on:** February 08, 2018, 11:17:05 AM »

Quote from: ChaimMoskowitz on February 08, 2018, 11:16:36 AM

He said a long time ago "100%" he will talk to Mueller without and qualifications. So was he an idiot or a liar when he said that?

he was playing you. And clearly quite effectively.

shapsam · « **Reply #18117 on:** February 08, 2018, 11:17:18 AM »

Quote from: ChaimMoskowitz on February 08, 2018, 11:16:36 AM

He said a long time ago "100%" he will talk to Mueller without and qualifications. So was he an idiot or a liar when he said that?

He said "subject to my lawyers and all that"

ChaimMoskowitz · « **Reply #18118 on:** February 08, 2018, 11:17:42 AM »

Quote from: shapsam on February 08, 2018, 11:15:26 AM

Reportedly...

So it gets it from a country he rags on all the time and you think that makes it better?

ChaimMoskowitz · « **Reply #18119 on:** February 08, 2018, 11:18:47 AM »

Quote from: shapsam on February 08, 2018, 11:17:18 AM

He said "subject to my lawyers and all that"

No you are wrong. You are talking about his recent statement once he got scared.

Topic Wiki

Poll

Who are you voting for?

Author Topic: US Politics/2016 Election Pick Your Poison Master Thread (Read 3828565 times)