The Future of Lakewood

[Yehuda57]

4. What if you actually need to get somewhere then?

You pay a fee. There would have to be plenty of transport options available, but places like downtown London charge congestion fees to eliminate private cars, and limit traffic to buses, taxis, and bikes.

[YitzyS]

There was no option to write a number. I hope this works.

[yesitsme]

https://twitter.com/OneJerseySchorr/status/1402253713830563842

[Euclid]

https://twitter.com/OneJerseySchorr/status/1402253713830563842

Where was this witness until now??

[YitzyS]

Where was this witness until now??

From LNN:

"At the time of the trial, the bookkeeper, who no longer worked for SCHI, was not aware that the entry she made was at the heart of the case against Rabbi Eisemann. Now that she has become aware, she has come forward to testify to his innocence."

[YitzyS]

Voter turnout in Lakewood was an abysmal 6.9 percent.

And we think politicians will listen to us... 

[avromie7]

Voter turnout in Lakewood was an abysmal 6.9 percent.

And we think politicians will listen to us... 

There weren't really any options...

[Definitions]

Voter turnout in Lakewood was an abysmal 6.9 percent.

And we think politicians will listen to us... 

I didn't even know there were elections until I saw your post yesterday or the day before. I still don't know what the elections were for

[YitzyS]

In Lakewood, Ciatteralli got 65.8 percent, Rizzo got 13.6 percent, Singh got 18.1 percent, and Levine got 2.3 percent

[yesitsme]

I didn't even know there were elections until I saw your post yesterday or the day before. I still don't know what the elections were for

same here

[yuneeq]

From LNN:

"At the time of the trial, the bookkeeper, who no longer worked for SCHI, was not aware that the entry she made was at the heart of the case against Rabbi Eisemann. Now that she has become aware, she has come forward to testify to his innocence."

Yeh, there’s definitely something misleading about this story.

[YitzyS]

Yeh, there’s definitely something misleading about this story.

I am very familiar with the story.

The charge Rabbi Eisemann was convicted of was not the main charges they went after him for. In every newspaper, they said that he stole government money meant for the school. The jury cleared him of all those charges. The remaining charges were spoken about for only a minute or two during trial. They would've fallen off when the jury cleared him of the charges of stealing if not for the fact that the judge changed the rules last minute to make the charges not depend on each other (this happened after the defense finished presenting their witnesses.).

It is highly likely that the bookkeeper never knew that her entry had anything to do with the case, and being that she was one of three bookkeepers that worked for the school - and she doesn't anymore, it isn't strange that she was not involved until it became clear that Rabbi Eisemann is likely headed to prison.

If this is not clear, feel free to PM me.

[aygart]

I am very familiar with the story.

The charge Rabbi Eisemann was convicted of was not the main charges they went after him for. In every newspaper, they said that he stole government money meant for the school. The jury cleared him of all those charges. The remaining charges were spoken about for only a minute or two during trial. They would've fallen off when the jury cleared him of the charges of stealing if not for the fact that the judge changed the rules last minute to make the charges not depend on each other (this happened after the defense finished presenting their witnesses.).

It is highly likely that the bookkeeper never knew that her entry had anything to do with the case, and being that she was one of three bookkeepers that worked for the school - and she doesn't anymore, it isn't strange that she was not involved until it became clear that Rabbi Eisemann is likely headed to prison.

If this is not clear, feel free to PM me.

This sounds like a major goof by the legal team

[YitzyS]

This sounds like a major goof by the legal team

Not at all. This was a major curveball that was thrown at them, and there was no way they could've anticipated it until it was too late.

Then, once he got a light sentence, people weren't so worried. But now that the appeals court is demanding an estimated 10-12 year sentence, the bookkeeper came forward.

There's another small point, but I'll PM.

[aygart]

Not at all. This was a major curveball that was thrown at them, and there was no way they could've anticipated it until it was too late.

Then, once he got a light sentence, people weren't so worried. But now that the appeals court is demanding an estimated 10-12 year sentence, the bookkeeper came forward.

There's another small point, but I'll PM.

There is always the chance that charges will be separated and to not defend against the lesser charge is a pretty bad goof

[YitzyS]

There is always the chance that charges will be separated and to not defend against the lesser charge is a pretty bad goof

its a lot more complicated than that. If I have time later, I’ll explain the details.

[YitzyS]

https://twitter.com/LakewoodScoop/status/1402691862905823238

[Ver hut gazugt]

https://twitter.com/LakewoodScoop/status/1402691862905823238

I dont understand, do they want to sentence him for 10-12 years for a 12 day loan ?
Is that correct?

[Ver hut gazugt]

It’s a lot more complicated than that, but that is part of it.

Financial facilitation needs two acts of criminal activity. The state alleges that the 12-day loan was the first criminal act, and the erasure of a different loan was the second.

The new testimony is that the second loan never existed, so the second prong of criminal activity falls away, and there was therefore no crime of financial facilitation.

There’s a lot more. It’s really hard to explain in a post. But I’m going to reiterate, he is 100 innocent of any crime. Not just that he did someone small and they’re giving him prison. He did NOTHING criminal.

Does the forum support voice notes
 

[YitzyS]

I deleted two posts about the case, because I don't want them on a public forum that is Google-able, and anyone can find them and twist them. If you did not see the posts yet, you can PM me and I'll send them to you.