Author Topic: Bloomberg contemplating running for POTUS (Read 2608 times)

Palm5 · « **on:** January 23, 2016, 08:21:08 PM »

I think a Jew in the WH would be detrimental. (Including sanders)

https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/editorials/2016/01/23/bloomberg-out-ruin-hillary-clinton-party/mKsbeYSs7I3ocd6O9mwZJI/story.html

Centro · « **Reply #1 on:** January 23, 2016, 08:27:47 PM »

I'd vote for him only of there's a plan to assassinate the next POTUS.

Hershelsdeals · « **Reply #2 on:** January 23, 2016, 08:30:09 PM »

Quote from: Centro on January 23, 2016, 08:27:47 PM

I'd vote for him only of there's a plan to assassinate the next POTUS.

Your under arrest

Sport · « **Reply #3 on:** January 23, 2016, 08:31:02 PM »

Quote from: Palm5 on January 23, 2016, 08:21:08 PM

I think a Jew in the WH would be detrimental. (Including sanders)

https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/editorials/2016/01/23/bloomberg-out-ruin-hillary-clinton-party/mKsbeYSs7I3ocd6O9mwZJI/story.html

Interesting. I would reluctantly vote for him over Trump or any democrat.
Interesting how the article makes no mention of Ted Cruze as a possible canditate.

Dan · « **Reply #4 on:** January 23, 2016, 08:33:31 PM »

I think he'd have a strong shot of winning in a Trump V Sanders election.

grodnoking · « **Reply #5 on:** January 23, 2016, 08:34:43 PM »

May be detrimental, but less detrimental than Trump or Hillary

Palm5 · « **Reply #6 on:** January 23, 2016, 08:48:01 PM »

Quote from: Sport on January 23, 2016, 08:31:02 PM

Interesting. I would reluctantly vote for him over Trump or any democrat.
Interesting how the article makes no mention of Ted Cruze as a possible canditate.

Thought about that too

Palm5 · « **Reply #7 on:** January 23, 2016, 08:49:15 PM »

Quote from: grodnoking on January 23, 2016, 08:34:43 PM

May be detrimental, but less detrimental than Trump or Hillary

I was referring to "Jews" but nonetheless you are correct as well.

Sport · « **Reply #8 on:** January 23, 2016, 08:52:11 PM »

Quote from: Dan on January 23, 2016, 08:33:31 PM

I think he'd have a strong shot of winning in a Trump V Sanders election.

Yup. I know nothing about the history of independent candidates but my guess is he'd probably be the first that was less extreme than the opposing candidates.

elit · « **Reply #9 on:** January 23, 2016, 08:57:28 PM »

Quote from: Sport on January 23, 2016, 08:52:11 PM

Yup. I know nothing about the history of independent candidates but my guess is he'd probably be the first that was less extreme than the opposing candidates.

He's pretty extreme. He's a tyrant

Sport · « **Reply #10 on:** January 23, 2016, 09:00:07 PM »

Quote from: elit on January 23, 2016, 08:57:28 PM

He's pretty extreme. He's a tyrant

He is a tyrant hence the reluctants. but his positions arent as extreme left as Sanders and definitly not as extreme as Trumps (whatever direction his are).

Dan · « **Reply #11 on:** January 23, 2016, 09:01:10 PM »

Quote from: Sport on January 23, 2016, 09:00:07 PM

(whatever direction his are).

Depends if he ate his Wheaties that day.

TimT · « **Reply #12 on:** January 23, 2016, 09:17:55 PM »

Prepare for 12 years of salt-free popcorn & 2oz sugary drinks.

ckmk47 · « **Reply #13 on:** January 23, 2016, 09:28:01 PM »

Quote from: Sport on January 23, 2016, 09:00:07 PM

He is a tyrant hence the reluctants. but his positions arent as extreme left as Sanders and definitly not as extreme as Trumps (whatever direction his are).

spelling alert: reluctance

Quote from: TimT on January 23, 2016, 09:17:55 PM