New Coin Deal

[EJB]

What's a good deal for this?

Market is at ~$100 more comission now

[zagguru]

I disagree. I think he ought to look out for readers best interests too. He gets a revenue stream from them as well. Of course he can do whatever he wants to do.

I dont even read sponsored posts, because i know they arent anything good. I think most think the same way

[zagguru]

Market is at ~$100 more comission now

You have seen an offer more than $267 (including coin and express shipping)?

[ae123]

Any way to know if there will be more such offerings in the (relatively) near future?

[stooges44]

Why does it need to be overnighted?

[chayal101]

Why does it need to be overnighted?

in case they accidentally fulfill too many orders... and the overnight orders will go out first??

[gozalim]

I think it should be made more clear here given that it is an objectively bad deal.

Consider this advertiser has put up assurances that are not present with other (competing) offers

[Deal Guy]

How much profit is the max being offered at the moment, and who should I contact?

[Agoldsc1]

I disagree. I think he ought to look out for readers best interests too. He gets a revenue stream from them as well. Of course he can do whatever he wants to do.

Dan has advertisements all the time on the website, for car leases, travel agencies, etc..., and no one expects those to be the best prices for the products advertised, that's why it's labeled an advertisement. I don't see how this is any different. However, I can't say that I love the idea of an advertiser having exclusive rights to a product and the boards being censored as a result.

[Agoldsc1]

How much profit is the max being offered at the moment, and who should I contact?

I emailed PFS and they raised my payment to $185 profit, but I included a screenshot of a company offering $200.

[stooges44]

in case they accidentally fulfill too many orders... and the overnight orders will go out first??

Really? Wow!

[Deal Guy]

I emailed PFS and they raised my payment to $185 profit, but I included a screenshot of a company offering $200.

Would you care to share who is offering 200 profit?

[CountValentine]

I emailed PFS and they raised my payment to $185 profit, but I included a screenshot of a company offering $200.

So they didn't match?

[EJB]

@dan should post a non sponsored post of the screenshot so that others can match. Now that’s a deal!

[jj1000]

But imo dan is doing a disservice to his readers by running this ad without letting ppl know they can make $100 more elsewhere with as much effort. Imo he should only have accepted the second add with permission to put some sort of disclaimer.

Just curious because you felt a need to let everyone know what a disservice the 2nd ad is.

Did you read the 2nd ad?

I normally wouldn't bother answering these types of hate comments, I mean c'mon it's an ad. In general if someone wants to advertise an overpriced product, as long as it's not a scam, it makes no difference to me. Of course we reccomend having best of web pricing but that's up to the advertiser to decide.

But this comment was just so ridiculous...When in fact we did add wording for exactly this reason to the 2nd ad.

[Agoldsc1]

So they didn't match?

Sorry, I had it wrong. Some individuals are offering $200, but a company (and by company, I mean an ad with a Watsapp number, so very likely an individual too) was offering $180. PFS wasn't able to match the individuals, but they did beat the company, so I'm satisfied, especially since I would not even have known about this deal were it not for the PFS ad on DDMS.

[EJB]

Just curious because you felt a need to let everyone know what a disservice the 2nd ad is.

Did you read the 2nd ad?

I normally wouldn't bother answering these types of hate comments, I mean c'mon it's an ad. In general if someone wants to advertise an overpriced product, as long as it's not a scam, it makes no difference to me. Of course we reccomend having best of web pricing but that's up to the advertiser to decide.

But this comment was just so ridiculous...When in fact we did add wording for exactly this reason to the 2nd ad.

Did you post any later than 3:51PM EST? If so my cache is probably stale and I apologize.

[EJB]

Consider this advertiser has put up assurances that are not present with other (competing) offers

Like what?

[myi]

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=l91ISfcuzDw

That explains why he was fired.
  That offer being an gargantuan amount.

https://youtu.be/7SAisWFutbw

[myi]

Just curious because you felt a need to let everyone know what a disservice the 2nd ad is.

Did you read the 2nd ad?

I normally wouldn't bother answering these types of hate comments, I mean c'mon it's an ad. In general if someone wants to advertise an overpriced product, as long as it's not a scam, it makes no difference to me. Of course we reccomend having best of web pricing but that's up to the advertiser to decide.

But this comment was just so ridiculous...When in fact we did add wording for exactly this reason to the 2nd ad.

Well said @jj1000. Couldn't have said it better myself.
  Was disturbed by that comment.
  As they say money talks if you're paying you can choose what to advertise.
   Even more than that, if in fact he's low-balling everyone he would know his ad is worthless, and he would be losing money on that, hence his ad must be somewhat somewhere worthwhile.