If the message is harmful then it should be stifled. If not it should be continued and honed to make it be the best message possible.
Let's put this to rest. You don't know what you're talking about as far as actual facts on the ground.
Yes, you linked a few studies that are tangentially related. But due to the complexity and insularity of the community, your concerns are so minor, they pale in the face of the clear and present danger of dismissing the problem as almost not applicable to us.