Author Topic: PLEASE HELP LAKEWOOD (Read 9457 times)

YitzyS · « **Reply #40 on:** July 19, 2021, 02:01:37 PM »

The BOE believes that the fact that the State loaned money to Lakewood - which is only legal if it's the only way T&E can be provided - is enough proof that the funding formula has to be fixed, and there is no reason to say that the students of Lakewood are getting an inadequate education.

Basically, you don't need to claim a lack of T&E in order to prove that the formula is broken. Relying on loans for T&E is sufficient to prove the point.

yelped · « **Reply #41 on:** July 19, 2021, 02:25:27 PM »

Quote from: YitzyS on July 19, 2021, 02:01:37 PM

The BOE believes that the fact that the State loaned money to Lakewood - which is only legal if it's the only way T&E can be provided - is enough proof that the funding formula has to be fixed, and there is no reason to say that the students of Lakewood are getting an inadequate education.

Basically, you don't need to claim a lack of T&E in order to prove that the formula is broken. Relying on loans for T&E is sufficient to prove the point.

Source? And that answer is weak sauce.

YitzyS · « **Reply #42 on:** July 19, 2021, 02:47:35 PM »

Quote from: yelped on July 19, 2021, 02:25:27 PM

Source?

Can't post, but a reliable source.

aygart · « **Reply #43 on:** July 19, 2021, 02:50:47 PM »

Quote from: yelped on July 19, 2021, 02:25:27 PM

Source? And that answer is weak sauce.

It depends if one is more likely than the other to bring more funding over the long term not whether or not DDF likes the answer.

aygart · « **Reply #44 on:** July 19, 2021, 02:52:14 PM »

Quote from: YitzyS on July 19, 2021, 12:22:41 PM

Can you explain why not? Her decision has to be approved. Why is that not basically a secretary?

Why does the existence of a hierarchy change whether or not it is an actual judge making an actual finding?

yelped · « **Reply #45 on:** July 19, 2021, 02:53:11 PM »

Quote from: aygart on July 19, 2021, 02:50:47 PM

It depends if one is more likely than the other to bring more funding over the long term not whether or not DDF likes the answer.

That's what I meant, and saying that loans demonstrate that the formula is broken much more likely to be dismissed since they will just say that the BOE mismanages money.

aygart · « **Reply #46 on:** July 19, 2021, 03:00:01 PM »

Quote from: yelped on July 19, 2021, 02:53:11 PM

That's what I meant, and saying that loans demonstrate that the formula is broken much more likely to be dismissed since they will just say that the BOE mismanages money.

There is a state monitor so they can't really say that.

yelped · « **Reply #47 on:** July 19, 2021, 03:03:50 PM »

Quote from: aygart on July 19, 2021, 03:00:01 PM

There is a state monitor so they can't really say that.

They are saying it now already in regards to Mr. Lang's case that they cannot provide T&E, and it makes much more sense to say it in regards to loans.

aygart · « **Reply #48 on:** July 19, 2021, 03:05:41 PM »

Quote from: yelped on July 19, 2021, 03:03:50 PM

They are saying it now already in regards to Mr. Lang's case

Where do you see that?

Euclid · « **Reply #49 on:** July 19, 2021, 04:10:23 PM »

Quote from: aygart on July 19, 2021, 03:45:33 PM

#headlines

2 headlines for the same item.

https://www.thelakewoodscoop.com/news/2021/07/new-jersey-investigating-breakthrough-covid-19-cases.html
https://lnnnews.com/2021/07/19/covid-vaccine-is-over-99-effective

Also compare their recent headlines/articles of this case. TLS is a clown show

yesitsme · « **Reply #50 on:** July 19, 2021, 07:00:36 PM »

Quote from: YitzyS on July 19, 2021, 02:01:37 PM

The BOE believes that the fact that the State loaned money to Lakewood - which is only legal if it's the only way T&E can be provided - is enough proof that the funding formula has to be fixed, and there is no reason to say that the students of Lakewood are getting an inadequate education.

Basically, you don't need to claim a lack of T&E in order to prove that the formula is broken. Relying on loans for T&E is sufficient to prove the point.

And no one cares

Deal Guy · « **Reply #51 on:** July 19, 2021, 09:00:46 PM »

Quote from: Euclid on July 19, 2021, 04:10:23 PM

Also compare their recent headlines/articles of this case. TLS is a clown show

Also compare the 2 articles about Lang.
The scoop made no mention of Lang, and only promoted Boe.

Deal Guy · « **Reply #52 on:** July 19, 2021, 09:06:59 PM »

Quote from: YitzyS on July 19, 2021, 02:01:37 PM

The BOE believes that the fact that the State loaned money to Lakewood - which is only legal if it's the only way T&E can be provided - is enough proof that the funding formula has to be fixed, and there is no reason to say that the students of Lakewood are getting an inadequate education.

Basically, you don't need to claim a lack of T&E in order to prove that the formula is broken. Relying on loans for T&E is sufficient to prove the point.

Even if true, why not let Lang also fight from another angle?
Other then Inzelbach looking good that he is providing Piners pride, at the expense of all the private parents, why insist that they ARE providing adequate education?

You should rather argue (Lang), that they can't provide a proper education.
And then have a 2ND ARGUMENT (Boe), that even the education they are providing is only because the state lends tens of millions.

But why fight like a baby that you are providing a proper education?? Unless you grew up and went to piners school, and have a need for piners pride.