Author Topic: Trump-Republican tax plan, Bad for large families  (Read 49466 times)

Offline Deal Guy

  • Dansdeals Presidential Platinum Elite
  • ********
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 4441
  • Total likes: 31
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 9
    • View Profile
Re: Trump-Republican tax plan bad for large families
« Reply #225 on: November 15, 2017, 03:46:27 PM »
Who cares? It would allow us to set up 529's for our children in utero!   /s
That is something totally different.

Offline skyguy918

  • Dansdeals Presidential Platinum Elite
  • ********
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 2797
  • Total likes: 147
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 1
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Location: Queens, NY
Re: Trump-Republican tax plan bad for large families
« Reply #226 on: November 15, 2017, 03:49:52 PM »
That is something totally different.
It was a joke. Specifically one mocking that provision.

FYI, /s means sarcasm.

Offline aygart

  • Dansdeals Lifetime Presidential Platinum Elite
  • *********
  • Join Date: May 2008
  • Posts: 6930
  • Total likes: 1590
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 7
    • View Profile
    • Lower Watt Energy Brokers
  • Programs: www.lowerwatt.com
You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used to start a religious discussion.

Offline CPA

  • Non-Elite Member
  • Join Date: Nov 2017
  • Posts: 0
  • Total likes: 4
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 0
    • View Profile
Re: Trump-Republican tax plan bad for large families
« Reply #228 on: November 15, 2017, 06:44:15 PM »

What happened to Orrin Hatch's supposed tax break for paying tuition to private religious schools as reported in the end of the link below?


Amendment# 4
http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/MasterTaxAmendments.pdf

Offline skyguy918

  • Dansdeals Presidential Platinum Elite
  • ********
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 2797
  • Total likes: 147
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 1
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Location: Queens, NY

Offline aro123

  • Dansdeals Gold Elite
  • ***
  • Join Date: Aug 2012
  • Posts: 119
  • Total likes: 24
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 0
    • View Profile

Offline EJB

  • Dansdeals Presidential Platinum Elite
  • ********
  • Join Date: Sep 2012
  • Posts: 4958
  • Total likes: 137
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 15
    • View Profile

Offline CPA

  • Non-Elite Member
  • Join Date: Nov 2017
  • Posts: 0
  • Total likes: 4
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 0
    • View Profile
Re: Trump-Republican tax plan bad for large families
« Reply #232 on: November 15, 2017, 07:38:09 PM »
Republicans when in power will try to slash tax rates while Democrats will try to increase rates on the rich (de Blasio in NYC). You can debate till your blue in the face - this isn't about facts it's about politics. If you want your wages to increase don't count on the Democrats or Republicans to solve your problems - go get a better education, a better job, a second job.

Offline Deal Guy

  • Dansdeals Presidential Platinum Elite
  • ********
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 4441
  • Total likes: 31
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 9
    • View Profile
Re: Trump-Republican tax plan bad for large families
« Reply #233 on: November 15, 2017, 07:55:41 PM »
Amendment# 4
http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/MasterTaxAmendments.pdf
When did that come out?

Why don't I see any mention of that in the link below regarding THE CHAIRMANíS MODIFICATION TO THE CHAIRMANíS MARK OF THE ďTAX CUTS AND JOBS ACT ? That is not amendments? What do I have wrong?
https://www.finance.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/11.14.17%20Chairman's%20Modified%20Mark.pdf



Offline CPA

  • Non-Elite Member
  • Join Date: Nov 2017
  • Posts: 0
  • Total likes: 4
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 0
    • View Profile
Re: Trump-Republican tax plan bad for large families
« Reply #234 on: November 15, 2017, 08:19:05 PM »
When did that come out?

Why don't I see any mention of that in the link below regarding THE CHAIRMANíS MODIFICATION TO THE CHAIRMANíS MARK OF THE ďTAX CUTS AND JOBS ACT ? That is not amendments? What do I have wrong?
https://www.finance.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/11.14.17%20Chairman's%20Modified%20Mark.pdf
I got that Sunday night.

There are the changes to the original bill and amendments that have to be voted on and included - semantics.

Offline yitzf

  • Dansdeals Presidential Platinum Elite
  • ********
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 2590
  • Total likes: 26
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 4
    • View Profile
Re: Trump-Republican tax plan bad for large families
« Reply #235 on: November 15, 2017, 10:01:12 PM »
When did that come out?

Why don't I see any mention of that in the link below regarding THE CHAIRMANíS MODIFICATION TO THE CHAIRMANíS MARK OF THE ďTAX CUTS AND JOBS ACT ? That is not amendments? What do I have wrong?
https://www.finance.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/11.14.17%20Chairman's%20Modified%20Mark.pdf

A chairmanís mark is the first draft of legislation introduced by the chairman of a committee or subcommittee that is then debated and amended by committee colleagues. This ability to decide the starting point for all further work on a piece of legislation is an important part of the chairís power.

Offline Deal Guy

  • Dansdeals Presidential Platinum Elite
  • ********
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 4441
  • Total likes: 31
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 9
    • View Profile
Re: Trump-Republican tax plan bad for large families
« Reply #236 on: November 15, 2017, 11:06:12 PM »
But would you think that if the chairman's modification to the chairman's mark that just came out yesterday, made no mention of private school tuition that was already mentioned on Monday, that it implies that they have forgotten about it, or is it really still there as an amendment?

Offline aygart

  • Dansdeals Lifetime Presidential Platinum Elite
  • *********
  • Join Date: May 2008
  • Posts: 6930
  • Total likes: 1590
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 7
    • View Profile
    • Lower Watt Energy Brokers
  • Programs: www.lowerwatt.com
Re: Trump-Republican tax plan bad for large families
« Reply #237 on: November 15, 2017, 11:16:26 PM »
But would you think that if the chairman's modification to the chairman's mark that just came out yesterday, made no mention of private school tuition that was already mentioned on Monday, that it implies that they have forgotten about it, or is it really still there as an amendment?
That can depend whether or not you understand congressional procedures.
You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used to start a religious discussion.

Offline ADG

  • Dansdeals Lifetime Platinum Elite
  • *******
  • Join Date: Apr 2015
  • Posts: 1454
  • Total likes: 70
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 0
    • View Profile
  • Location: BK
Re: Trump-Republican tax plan bad for large families
« Reply #238 on: November 16, 2017, 10:28:22 AM »
Republicans when in power will try to slash tax rates while Democrats will try to increase rates on the rich (de Blasio in NYC). You can debate till your blue in the face - this isn't about facts it's about politics. If you want your wages to increase don't count on the Democrats or Republicans to solve your problems - go get a better education, a better job, a second job.

I agree with you and could not have said it better myself. It is just insulting to be lied to and taken as a fool.So I happy about this guy...

https://www.wsj.com/articles/republican-sen-ron-johnson-opposes-gop-senate-tax-package-1510777290

Offline aygart

  • Dansdeals Lifetime Presidential Platinum Elite
  • *********
  • Join Date: May 2008
  • Posts: 6930
  • Total likes: 1590
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 7
    • View Profile
    • Lower Watt Energy Brokers
  • Programs: www.lowerwatt.com
Re: Trump-Republican tax plan bad for large families
« Reply #239 on: November 16, 2017, 10:42:42 AM »
I agree with you and could not have said it better myself. It is just insulting to be lied to and taken as a fool.So I happy about this guy...

https://www.wsj.com/articles/republican-sen-ron-johnson-opposes-gop-senate-tax-package-1510777290
The only fool is the one who comes up with opinions without being willing to review the facts. That includes most (all?) politicians.
You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used to start a religious discussion.