Arguments libs use to defend baby slaying are mind-numbing:
Rep. John Rogers of Birmingham, AL
"Some kids are unwanted, so you kill them now or you kill them later. You bring them in the world unwanted, unloved, you send them to the electric chair. So, you kill them now or you kill them later"
Clearly, this dem agrees that abortion = murder. And if you listen to other libs, it's clear that many are of the same opinion.
But John holds that since the mother wants to slay her infant, then if she can't, the baby won't get enough love anyhow and will probably get the electric chair.
Scary.
First off, very few people receive the death penalty even in a state that allows it, so the odds are stacked against it. But anyhow, can we shoot a kid that doesn't have a loving parent?
Other genius arguments are along the lines of, "do you know how hard it is to carry a baby?"
In other words, it may well be manslaughter but vacuuming out the baby is OK because it's really hard to hold that baby for nine months.
Wow.
