Trump banning 7 major Muslim countries citizens entry into the US

[cf]

Isn't this like prioritizing Jewish refugees during WWII?

[cf]

He didn't say "hugh" so we are not talking about millions. So what is "large"?

What difference does it make?

[aygart]

How many of these 7 countries does Trump do business with or have a hotel there?

I would imagine none. That would be a very poor business decision.

How many terrorist acts have refugees from these 7 countries committed?

http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/15/politics/syrian-refugees-isis-screenings/

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-36882445

[JTZ]

I would imagine none. That would be a very poor business decision.http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/15/politics/syrian-refugees-isis-screenings/

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-36882445

So the answer is zero to both questions. I guess I will just have to answer for you from now on since you refuse to. 

[JTZ]

What difference does it make?

So if one is killed that is the same as 1000? There is no difference?

[David Smith]

@realDonaldTrump

Christians in the Middle-East have been executed in large numbers. We cannot allow this horror to continue!

Muslims in the middle east have been executed in large numbers too. The world seems intent on allowing that horror to continue.

#AmericaFirst
#MAGA

[aygart]

So the answer is zero to both questions. I guess I will just have to answer for you from now on since you refuse to. 

How is that a zero to the second

[JTZ]

How is that a zero to the second

You took my question not to mean in the US?

[zh cohen]

How many of these 7 countries does Trump do business with or have a hotel there?

This is a very stupid comment... (Nothing personal, I know you didn't make it up, and I doubt you believe the answers to this question mean anything)

The EO doesn't mention a single country. The list of countries is the one the Obama administration declared most likely to have terrorists come from.

[aygart]

You took my question not to mean in the US?

Why is that relevant to whether or not there is more risk from those countries? Maybe the current vetting process here is better than in Europe, but nothing has been communicated to make us think it is.

[JTZ]

This is a very stupid comment... (Nothing personal, I know you didn't make it up, and I doubt you believe the answers to this question mean anything)

The EO doesn't mention a single country. The list of countries is the one the Obama administration declared most likely to have terrorists come from.

Actually it was a question? 
I did not look at the EO at all. It doesn't affect certain countries?

[JTZ]

Why is that relevant to whether or not there is more risk from those countries?

We can debate if it is relevant or not but the answer AFAIK is ZERO!

[aygart]

We can debate if it is relevant or not but the answer AFAIK is ZERO!

I consider the distinction irrelevant and therefore answered based on relevance. In the US it is zero.

[JTZ]

I consider the distinction irrelevant and therefore answered based on relevance. In the US it is zero.

We are making progress. 

[David Smith]

I consider the distinction irrelevant and therefore answered based on relevance. In the US it is zero.

Saying that drastic problems necessitate drastic solutions even when it means innocents being caught in the crossfire, and saying that the current procedures in place are failing miserably; is difficult to argue when the answer to that question is zero.