Dispute Credit pull?

[shulem92]

You have a hard time answering a simple question. Tell the members how many PM's you consider "filled up my PM". It will give the members a good idea the way you look at things.

Just tell us already. I'm so curious.

[JTZ]

I replied to each message you sent me. I didn't initiate contact with you in any way.

Translation: I have to have the last word. LOL

[aygart]

I replied to each message you sent me. I didn't initiate contact with you in any way.

Number numbers numbers

[jsk173]

You have a hard time answering a simple question. Tell the members how many PM's you consider "filled up my PM". It will give the members a good idea the way you look at things.

If you thought the discussion was no longer worthwhile, why did you immediately resume it via PM? There were multiple people participating; how is it better to have a bunch of PMs flying around instead of just continuing the discussion in the thread — the thread YOU saw fit to resurrect after 2 months of dormancy?

You got caught being dishonest so now you're trying to change the subject. That's all this is.

[aygart]

O
a diagram of every conversation here which you participated in.

[JTZ]

Why are you so afraid to answer the simple question. Tell the members how many PM's you consider "filled up my PM's" is.

[aygart]

If you thought the discussion was no longer worthwhile, why did you immediately resume it via PM? There were multiple people participating; how is it better to have a bunch of PMs flying around instead of just continuing the discussion in the thread — the thread YOU saw fit to resurrect after 2 months of dormancy?

You got caught being dishonest so now you're trying to change the subject. That's all this is.

Let's say he was wrong for feeling that notifications were bothering people, how does that make him dishonest?

[jsk173]

Let's say he was wrong for feeling that notifications were bothering people, how does that make him dishonest?

He dishonestly announced he was done with the discussion. Which part of this do you not understand?

[aygart]

He dishonestly announced he was done with the discussion. Which part of this do you not understand?

Too much nuance for you huh?

[mmgfarb]

He dishonestly announced he was done with the discussion. Which part of this do you not understand?

He said he was finished with the conversation here because it was bothering members, not that he was finished with it completely.

[jsk173]

He said he was finished with the conversation here because it was bothering members, not that he was finished with it completely.

No, he said he was done with it. There's also zero evidence of it "bothering members"; there were only about 10 people active in those threads and they could have unsubscribed from notifications at any time.

[shulem92]

He dishonestly announced he was done with the discussion. Which part of this do you not understand?

He announced that he was done on a public forum, because ”I just found out that members are getting notifications each time this trash is posted. It would be best we just don't respond. I am done and hope you all follow my lead.” how is continuing via PM dishonest to that statement?

[aygart]

He said he was finished with the conversation here because it was bothering members, not that he was finished with it completely.

Too much nuance for him to understand.

[jsk173]

He announced that he was done on a public forum, because ”I just found out that members are getting notifications each time this trash is posted. It would be best we just don't respond. I am done and hope you all follow my lead.” how is continuing via PM dishonest to that statement?

He "just found out" how notifications worked, after 7 months and almost 1,000 comments here? Come on.

[shulem92]

Please continue this argument here

[shulem92]

He "just found out" how notifications worked, after 7 months and almost 1,000 comments here? Come on.

So now you're insinuating that the dishonesty was something else. After your original claim of dishonesty was shot down. Its beginning to sound like the cry of Wolf

[jsk173]

So now you're insinuating that the dishonesty was something else. After your original claim of dishonesty was shot down. Its beginning to sound like the cry of Wolf

What are you talking about?

He dishonestly said he was done with the discussion, and the claim he "just found out" how notifications worked doesn't pass the laugh test.

[aygart]

What are you talking about?

He dishonestly said he was done with the discussion, and the claim he "just found out" how notifications worked doesn't pass the laugh test.

He probably did it as a courtesy to someone who was bothered by it, something you are incapable of understanding so don't bother.

[jsk173]

He probably did it as a courtesy to someone who was bothered by it, something you are incapable of understanding so don't bother.

Oh, is that right? Why didn't the person simply unsubscribe?

[aygart]

Oh, is that right? Why didn't the person simply unsubscribe?

because he wanted to continue getting notifications about relevant stuff?