What are you talking about?He dishonestly said he was done with the discussion, and the claim he "just found out" how notifications worked doesn't pass the laugh test.
because he wanted to continue getting notifications about relevant stuff?
It's not like we were debating hard pulls in the Chase CSR thread.
But you were cluttering up that thread with your wrong information to.You going just have someone call you a liar? LOL
The information wasn't wrong, as the posted legal statute eventually proved.
nuance
This is an indisputable legal fact.
Only in your mind. Show the members how your mind works. Tell them how many PM's you consider "filling up your PM's".
This silliness is just a distraction from your sorry behavior in this thread. You got proven wrong, you didn't like it, and now you're trying to make me the bad guy. Not interested in playing along any further.
Not interested in playing along any further.
See you just don't get it. I don't play.
You argued that something was illegal but then couldn't cite a law in support of your position.
Where did I say it was illegal? Seems now you have a compulsive problem with not telling the truth.
You said it was illegal for banks to make hard pulls for purposes of account review for existing customers, did you not? You said that if a bank made such a pull, they could be sued, did you not?If it's not illegal, then what would be the cause of action for people who had such hard pulls made? What would be the grounds for the LAWsuit? Please explain.
I would not use the term illegal because that would be in the criminal sense to me. You are the one that keeps using that term.
Your credibility is shot so what is the purpose of this. No one is going to put any value in what you say from here on out.
You don't seem to have any idea what you're arguing, but *my* credibility is shot? Yeah, sure.
You want the last word and you can have it. You are right about pulls, HUCA, Chase CL, sitting next to a women and all your other posts. You happy now?I can't forget, LOL
The difference between you and him is that he's built up a reputation of helpful and constructive posting (we won't count JS on Friday's ) over a longer period of time while you have not. So I for one would give the credibility to JTZ, not you.
This is utterly childish and appeals to authority are dumb. The fact this guy has been here for 4 months longer than me doesn't mean a damn thing when we're discussing hard facts.