No I am talking about the Federal charges that were dropped after the 86 convictions of fraud. Please let’s not pretend there was no child labor. If you want retry this make sure you use facts and not personal feelings.
1) They did not drop child labor charges. He was acquitted in state court. They dropped illegal immigration charges.
It's far from a given they dropped because they already had the sentence they wanted and would have nailed him on those, because a) those charges were there first. If it was such a given, they could have nailed him before the bank fraud even happened. B) Hiring illegals doesn't mean you did it on purpose - the illegals provide false papers to get hired. Not hiring because you suspect they are false is illegal in its own right. This happens even with companies that had e-verify in place. See the 2 part series This American Life did a couple of weeks ago on poultry plants in Alabama. He was the first and only such meat/poultry executive that was gone after like this.
2) You have brought up that this went "all the way to the SC," even thought you've been answered multiple times that because the Supreme Court doesn't take a case, doesn't mean it's because they agree. They only take cases they think have wider application not just for the individuals involved.
3) Lower appeals were lost not because they didn't prove prosecutorial or judicial misconduct, but because he would have been guilty regardless of those accusations. Which is true. He committed the fraud, no one argues that. (but see the link at the end to see why even this is ridiculous.)
Linda Reade has a history of cruel and vicious sentencing, beyond what prosecutors ask for and what guidelines suggest. So I don't know if she is an anti semite or just an awful human being, period.
As for the prosecution, there is more of a case for antisemitism. From the beginning of singling out his plant for the raid, right through denying him bail based on his religion (overturned by another judge) and meddling in the sale of his business to up his sentence.
This case stunk. There are loads of articles on the left and right side of the spectrum, from Jew and non-jew alike, decrying the prosecution and justice, with plenty calling it antisemitic.
Read this for more details
http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/front-page/thirteen-outrages-in-the-rubashkin-prosecution/2018/01/03/If even 3 of those 13 are true, it's an outrage. I venture you'd be unable to disprove a single one.
Now, what other excuse is there for such misconduct other than antisemitism?