I have been told my times (tax thread) why am I worried about what someone else is getting. So I will ask you the same thing.
From the article headlines:
Prosecutors said Tucker stole $1.3 billion from poor customers
Supposedly the "justification" for SMRs sentence was the amount of losses incurred by the banks.
Seems like here despite a much larger amount, sentence is shorter. (Besides for other striking differences).
As someone said recently about ducks...
Let me say it in unequivocal terms: Linda Reade is a blatant antisemite! This case is just תנא דמסייע, doesn't prove anything.